Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

God is real

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 18:00 ID:QVhLPRyK

Just because he doesn't come to your house and do magic tricks for you doesn't mean he's not real.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 18:07 ID:uKKJj9Ev

Apenas porque él no viene a su casa y hacer los trucos mágicos para usted no significa que él no es verdadero.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 18:17 ID:9JkeAcJj

Apenas porque ele não vem a tua casa e faz truques de magia para ti não quer dizer que ele não é real.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 18:44 ID:idx/1puL

Apenas porque ele what não vem a tua the casa e faz fuck truques de magia is para ti não quer dizer que ele não é this real.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 21:49 ID:XDW2ceQY

>>1
yes it does, if we are defining him by "god" being in a form of matter, he does not exist in this universe. There is only one way he migh possibly exist anywhere. The multiverse theory, google it

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-17 23:26 ID:hnoMgo9J

>>5
God exists, I'm chilling here with him now, I'll let him type.

Yo sup.

See, irrefutable evidence.

Name: RedCream 2007-07-18 20:52 ID:mSuxTh0m

#1, a magician doesn't have to perform tricks in order for his existence to be positively established.  This is in remarkable contrast to the "Big Jew In The Sky", who has done lots of magic tricks for Humans ... except when the cameras and tape recorders are around.  There is no evidence for "His" existence, and that's doubly damning since all these "holy rollers" who claim he exists must have detected SOMETHING (or they just have mental afflictions -- which is actually the case here).

Once again, the requirement for proof cannot be denied despite what the mental retards (i.e. religious folk) assert.  They can assert all they want; like I've said before, I can assert the existence of the fucking Easter Bunny with equal applicability to reality (i.e. NONE).  Proof must be proffered, and that applies doubly so when the assertion is for something extraordinary (like an anthropomorphic bunny or universe-sized Jew).

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-18 22:32 ID:s9d8qfsv

>>7
tl;dr: blruggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggh i liek kiwifruitszzz

Name: sage 2007-07-19 0:15 ID:Heaven

>>1

Either horrible troll or bona fide retard. The choice is yours.

sage

Name: RedCream 2007-07-19 10:40 ID:v002WgwB

#8, I just pulled Gilgamesh out of my ass.  You can't see Him, and He certainly won't be doing fucking tricks for you, but He's real, all right.  To assure He's real, all I have to do is get 100 million other motherfuckers to agree that He's real? ... which is the exact, same case for the "Big Jew In The Sky".

#8, since "Gilgie" (as a I like to call Him) is invisible, doesn't smell, and otherwise can decide to offer no proof of His material existence, you will never know that I just sent Him to hover over your left shoulder.  Oh, He's there, I assure you.  You don't have to wait before 100 million other people agree with me that He does, since agreement doesn't alter REALITY, now, does it?  Gilgie is there, watching you.  Watching you eat.  Watching you sleep.  Watching you masturbate and probably stick a foul buttplug up your ass.  If you can still do all those things knowing Gilgie is there watching, then have at it!

Name: God 2007-07-19 15:00 ID:XyXWwlw0

Stop fucking with me!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-19 15:08 ID:wzPI9nPu

If something has no observable effect on the universe, that's the same thing as not existing.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-19 16:09 ID:Heaven

fuck niggers

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 17:01 ID:hMG2x72j

God may exist, but he sure as hell isn't supernatural.

Name: RedCream 2007-07-24 17:38 ID:ih6rXCXO

#14, saying "God may exist" is spurious, since there's a whole lot of evidence on one side (nonexistence) and ZERO evidence on the other (existence).  What you should have said was:

"God's nonexistence is one of the most certain things we know, but even if he did exist, he sure as hell isn't supernatural, although I have absolutely no evidence for that latter assertion."

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 17:48 ID:7DykUnQM

God is a logical concept, like the wheel. Do you want to stop using wheels or anything which depends or profits from wheels just because it is a logical concept and not a physical entity?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 17:53 ID:XqNvg1hk

>>16
I believe God can exist because I've never seen proof that God doesn't exist.

I believe God can not exist because I've never seen proof that God does exist.

I don't believe God exists, because I've never seen proof that God does exist.

I don't believe God does not exist, because I've never seen proof that God does not exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 17:58 ID:7DykUnQM

>>17
No.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 18:01 ID:XqNvg1hk

>>18
Why not?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 19:29 ID:7DykUnQM

>>19
First off, just to lay it on the table, people have different ideas about what god/gods is/are. A person's idea of god is not necessarily restricted to the same domain as a juicy tomato, a god can be metaphysical like the concept of the wheel.

Concepts can only be judged by their effects, you assume wheels are solid circular objects and they roll because those are the properties of the wheel, when you see a solid circular object roll it validates the wheel. In the same way you assume a person who truly believes in a particular god will devote themselves to ending as much sufferring as possble in their lives, give or take a few mistakes and sins, when this happens it validates god.

Some people believe their god wants them to kill unbelievers or obey religious leaders unquestioningly. Then again the wheel can be used to run people over aswell as make it cheaper and easier to transport delicious tomatos.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 19:30 ID:7DykUnQM

>>19
This isn't my idea by the way. Read "A critique of pure reason" by Immanuel Kant.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 19:38 ID:XqNvg1hk

>>20
So what are you disagreeing with in >>17 that prompted a "No".

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-24 20:09 ID:Heaven

mmm delicious sage

Name: 4tran 2007-07-24 20:56 ID:LIZrsfCz

>>16
Last I checked, wheels are very much physical objects.  Do you want me to find you an operational bicycle/car and point to a wheel?  Or are you talking about that mathematical wheel theory?

>>20
By that standard, I can say that the holy Gilgamesh commands us to raid /b/.  If we are to believe in his holiness and actually pull it off, that somehow validates Gilgamesh?  That makes no sense at all.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 3:19 ID:0Uxq4A9w

just because flying hamburgers dont inconvenience their own paths of hamburgery mysticism to fleeting arrive at my doorstep so that I may enjoy an easily obtained meal of grease and meat does not mean they arent just too lazy to do so
come on be a little realistic for once

Name: Addlebee Titswerth 2007-07-25 4:55 ID:Heaven

God is grease.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 5:14 ID:OlpzMBLJ

>>22
I told you.
>>24
The idea of the wheel is not a physical entity as I explained in >>20.
>>24
Raiding /b/ is like pissing in an ocean of piss and most people here couldn't be botherred. If it did happen then this particular Gilgamesh would be validated.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 6:28 ID:qUWZpgo8

>>8
I don't know why, but when I read this, I couldn't stop laughing. I think I need to go to bed.

oh and sage for craptacularnessosity.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 11:19 ID:Uh8P0CNJ

>>27
22 here, I saw you respond saying lots of things about Kant and God being a concept and all, none of which was apparently contradictory to any of my statements, unless you're trying to assert that I have seen proof and didn't know it, which I would expect you to say if that were the point you were making.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 12:06 ID:OlpzMBLJ

>>29
Do you disagree with something?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 12:57 ID:Uh8P0CNJ

>>30
No, you did.  I asked what you were disagreeing with.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 13:43 ID:OlpzMBLJ

>>31
I never said I disagreed with anything.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 13:45 ID:Uh8P0CNJ

>>32
Sorry, I guess I misunderstood "no".

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-25 14:43 ID:Heaven

I HATE YOU ALL

Name: 4tran 2007-07-26 0:19 ID:RiialC6y

>>27
Are you suggesting that the wheel is a concept like mathematics?  eg pi, e,...?  If that's the case, then what is physical?  I can call all physical objects a concept: air validates the concept of gas, cats validate the concept of friendly quadrupeds...

For once in our lives, let's finally "validate" a so called "God", Gilgamesh:

GILGAMESH COMMANDS YOU ALL TO SPAM /B/ ON 8/8/2007 AT 8PM PST, SO THAT YOU WILL HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO PREPARE.  BRING LOTS OF EQUATIONS.  BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY AD INFINITUM.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-26 1:42 ID:z+ssNpzy

I believe Gilgamesh can exist because I've never seen proof that Gilgamesh doesn't exist.

I believe Gilgamesh can not exist because I've never seen proof that Gilgamesh does exist.

I don't believe Gilgamesh exists, because I've never seen proof that Gilgamesh does exist.

I don't believe Gilgamesh does not exist, because I've never seen proof that Gilgamesh does not exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-26 3:21 ID:hqP/ZLbI

>>36
I share this set of statements.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-26 8:44 ID:/6hDPyAV


GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD
GILGAMESH IS THE NEW GOD

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-26 13:15 ID:8iNNUjkT

>>35

A perfect wheel does not exist. All physical wheels are just approximations of a cylinder, and have n sides. n is finite, no matter how large.

>>38

(cough) fag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-27 4:35 ID:Heaven

Ch-ch-ch-chawk-lit Wrayn!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-28 5:27 ID:iKT2lcuy

my penis is god

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-28 11:49 ID:HgbIWBPv

Just because he doesn't come to your house and do magic tricks for you doesn't mean he's not real, doesn't mean he's real.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 5:16 ID:Heaven

Some stay dry and others feel the pain. Chawk-lit Wrayn!

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 7:06 ID:KXeEaCAY

I agree with some here. "God" and "Wheel" are similar. But our physical realization of "Wheel" has a purpose. "God" doesn't.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 7:28 ID:75PTzlJ+

>>35 As the /B/ representative patrolling these boards I can tell you right now that your going to fail

Anyways there is no way for god to be real, if he was then the FSM would have told us so.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 7:48 ID:s4nQXYVv


For once in our lives, let's finally "validate" a so called "God", Gilgamesh:

GILGAMESH COMMANDS YOU ALL TO SPAM /B/ ON 8/8/2007 AT 8PM PST, SO THAT YOU WILL HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO PREPARE.  BRING LOTS OF EQUATIONS.  BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY AD INFINITUM.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 17:18 ID:/RNT3Zj3

there's no god because you're alive

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 18:41 ID:Heaven

>>44
fucking retards.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-16 18:42 ID:iSt9+hpT

This is an important thread.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-17 1:55 ID:lJPGJahB

>>49

its about as important as satans nutsack

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-16 2:00

God Number Is Now 20: How Did Google Solve it? : http://www.pinoytutorial.com/bestandworst/god-number-now-20-rubiks-cube

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List