Irrational Atheism

I have never seen evidence of irrational numbers, therefore, irrational numbers do not exist.

Prove me wrong.

So called "proofs of the existence of irrational numbers" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard rational number system.  They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION.  GB2 Aljabr.

Nice try, trollfag

fuck you and fuck this shit its fucking fujck

They do, everywhere in physics.  And imaginary numbers are everywhere too (in waves and rotation and stuff).
Teist failtroll is fail.

>>1
I've never seen evidence of numbers, therefore, numbers do not exist.

Prove me wrong.

So called "proofs of the existence of numbers" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of set theory. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 Middleschool.

I've never seen evidence of reality, therefore, reality does not exist.

Prove me wrong.

So called "proofs of the existence of reality" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of perception. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 nothing.

I've never seen evidence of evidence, therefore, evidence does not exist.

Prove me wrong.

So called "proofs of the existence of evidence" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of perception. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 nothing.

OP here, I like the direction this thread is going.

stop douching up this board

>>9

This board has been douching itself up for a long while.  I can't remember more than a handful of somewhat interesting posts in the past year.  Meanwhile there's been plentiful .999~ bickering and God discussion by people who don't understand basic logic or mathematics.

>>5,6,7
win!

>>1
The theists try to claim that a _real_ god exists.  Mathematicians never claim the existnace of numbers or any other construct in the _real_ world.  They only claim that it exists on paper/their imagination.  With these imaginary constructs, we can do stuff.

Look at the fucking area and circumference of a circle and there's a relation between the dimensions of the circle and pi, you fuckwit.

That's only true in a flat world, which we are assuming.  Can you actually prove that we live in 3d flat space (even if you do measurements, remember that there are limitations to how accurate the measurements are)?  If we use mathematics to construct a circle, and find its area/circumference, then we are dealing with an invented construct (which we assume to be a good model of reality).

>>12
dumb

>>13
smart

>>14
correct

π, ~= 3.14
It's as real as 3, which I've yet to see evidence of. It may have a slightly more complicated definition, but that's it!

I wants lots and lots of some delectable pot!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

The word pirahna, is all I can think of that rhymes with marijuana

Marijuana MUST be legalized.