I have never seen evidence of irrational numbers, therefore, irrational numbers do not exist.
Prove me wrong.
So called "proofs of the existence of irrational numbers" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard rational number system. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 Aljabr.
>>1
I've never seen evidence of numbers, therefore, numbers do not exist.
Prove me wrong.
So called "proofs of the existence of numbers" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of set theory. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 Middleschool.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-08 3:30 ID:0balQBjj
I've never seen evidence of reality, therefore, reality does not exist.
Prove me wrong.
So called "proofs of the existence of reality" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of perception. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 nothing.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-08 3:53 ID:kbxwhtoo
I've never seen evidence of evidence, therefore, evidence does not exist.
Prove me wrong.
So called "proofs of the existence of evidence" will be swiftly labeled as what they are, proofs of complicated artifacts arising naturally from the existence of certain relations and processes within the standard system of perception. They are COMPLETELY EXPECTED and DO NOT CONFLICT AT ALL WITH OBSERVATION. GB2 nothing.