Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Safe Sex Without Condoms?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-28 2:10 ID:8JVX9Qzb

Call me stupid, but I want sex without condoms. Sure, the girl can be on the pill and there can be spermicide and other birth control added into the mix, but, I want it without condoms.

A few years back me and my girlfriend at the time went to the local Planned Parenthood and got her on a birth control pill. They told her she's perfectly fine to have sex without a condom as long as she's taking the pill everyday. This resulted in wonderful times for me.

Now, my new girlfriend, years later, is the patch, after looking into the options, but sex without a condom wasn't offered.

I'm no pregnancy genius, so i'm curious as to whether i'd been completely lied to beforehand and had extremely stupid amounts of condomless sex, or if perhaps i've been mislead recently and that safe, condomless sex exists.

Mind you, when I say safe sex, I mean no pregnancy. With a mongomous relationship, i'm not too worried about STDs. Strictly talking about pregnancy here.

I figured this is the only board this is relevent to, considering health, sex, and the human body are considered science.

So, any help?

Name: 4tran 2007-06-29 6:22 ID:4DnSQRQ8

>>7
I'd say a few weeks after birth.  The little creatures are barely sentient, and barely capable of motion.  Hell, dogs have more intellect than 1 week old human babies, and we kill dogs all the time.  I agree with >>3, but it would be preferable if less harmful (to the mother) methods of abortion were available.

>>12
Right... I'd like to see that day old blastocyst live by itself outside the uterus.  It's hard enough even in a controlled environment (eg test tube), let alone the heavily contaminated region known as everyday life.

>>15
w007 - Another source I encountered a while ago compared the embryo to a malignant tumor.  They consume the host's resources without contributing anything.  Thus, they can be freely eradicated with impunity.

>>16
Last I checked, sperm is definitely less capable of living on its own.  Compared to other similar sized organisms, it has negligible protection and is barely able to feed itself.

>>18
I never said that you can't kill a 3 week old baby.

Now that we're on this topic, I recall a number of years ago, there was an unfortunate pregnant girl whose parents were oppossed to abortion (I think), and was unable to obtain one (this I do remember).  She eventually gave birth and removed her child from existance.  When the federal authorities found out, she was sentenced to many years in jail (some serial killers get lighter sentences, arg).  My sympathies are with her, though I'm not sure what the rest of 4chan thinks.  Thoughts?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List