male circumcision encouraged. they both do the same thing, they remove a part of our pleasure. Why are they viewed so differently. Women still can have orgasms without their clit.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-26 12:41
What? The clit is an integral part of female orgasm, it denies them the ability to have a clitoral orgasm when removed. Males can orgasm just fine with no foreskin, and may even enhance it by making it more sensitive.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-26 13:05
>>2
If the head is normally covered by the foreskin, it will be more sensitive when bared during sexual excitement. I guarantee it.
>>2
just hand over your gold and gtfo jew, hannukah's over
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-26 17:50
>>1 male circumcision encouraged
Any kind of circumcision is only encouraged in retarded countries, in mine both are despised.
they both do the same thing
The one niggers do to girls is terribly painful and traumatizing, and may even kill them.
Women still can have orgasms without their clit.
No. Their sexuality is ruined for life, and it hurts and bleeds terribly on first sex, which further hurts them physically and psychologically. I would take the niggers who do that and burn them alive, the faggots. And as they are screaming while getting burnt, I would tell them, Anonymous owned you sucker!
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-26 23:45
>>6
Yes I once read about this and viewed pictures of the result of female circumcision. I wept for 2 reasons:
(1) because of how such a beautiful thing was mutilated
(2) because I was looking at nigger vaginas
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-27 2:47
female circumcision turns me on. nothing better than fucking a girl who cant enjoy it.
As anthropologist Fuambai Ahmadu (2000) pointed out, her experience with ritual excision, though painful, empowered her as a woman in the Kono culture of Sierra Leone, increased her sexual sensitivity, and (due to its partial medicalization) led to no health problems beyond the initial heavy bleeding. She claims it did not interfere with her transnational life at all (305), thus was not “anti-progress”, and argues for its complete medicalization, not elimination (304).
GUESS THAT MEAN YOU FUCKING DITCH-PIG, PUSSY-CHEESE COLOR HATE-HONKIES DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT----PER USUAL
GTFO and stop hating on shit you don't understand
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 1:06 (sage)
Anti-chan, my good man, are you implying that you wouldn't mind my beating you up, because there are some people that enjoy getting beaten?
You practice an interesting form of logic.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 1:55
"though painful, empowered her as a woman in the Kono culture of Sierra Leone, increased her sexual sensitivity, and (due to its partial medicalization) led to no health problems beyond the initial heavy bleeding."
No. Because that's not even close to the issue here. These are children following a cultural tradition. They aren't being "BEATEN UP" or "MUTILATED". That's just your perception of what's happening.
What I find rediculous here is that the west only seems to care about what's going on in non-capitalist countries, esscentially non-white countries when some practice is going on that they don't understand and therefore fear.
What you simply fail to understand is that the only real issue we can have against them is the non-medicalization of the act. THAT would be inhumane- just as cutting off foreskin with a shard of glass would be inhumane. Who cares if *you* don't understand their tradition or their culture? *You* don't have a right to judge them or outlaw the practice if there's no harm in it.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 6:32 (sage)
Last I checked, the word "tradition" didn't justify anything. Tradition on the Pitcairn Islands was old men raping little girls. They were still put on trial and convicted.
And to claim there is 'no harm in it' is nonsense, and you know it. Pain isn't harm? Substantial loss of blood isn't harm? The removal of an organ with thousands of nerve endings isn't harm?
You seriously need to work on your trolling skills, I hardly even feel angered.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 10:19
what does this have to do with science or maths?
why do people use "cultural relativism" to justify such barbaric and debilitating practices?
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 16:36
>>16 These are children following a cultural tradition. They aren't being "BEATEN UP" or "MUTILATED". That's just your perception of what's happening.
Die, please.
Like I said: Why is it alright to mutilate a little boys foreskin in America but wrong in other cultures? You're all be hypocrites and you know it. If you can get beyond your own narrow (but not as narrow as your little sister's ass crack, WHICH I PROFOUNDLY JIZZED IN) view of the world...you'd see that.
Studies have been done that rebuke the idea that this is some torturous practice. Clearly there's no harm in the operation if it's done medically. RAPING little girls isn't fucking CLOSE to the same fucking level, dumbdick. That's like comparing Bush to Hitler. And you know what they say about Hitlar comparisons.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 18:24 (sage)
Why is it alright to mutilate a little boys foreskin in America but wrong in other cultures? You're all be hypocrites and you know it.
So far only >>2 has argued this. But somehow all of us are hypocrites? Please explain!
Clearly there's no harm in the operation if it's done medically.
Clearly? Beyond the mental problems it will cause for many victims, physical issues have been listed above. Please explain your position further! And if you're going to mention 'studies', give us a reference.
RAPING little girls isn't fucking CLOSE to the same fucking level
Who decides this? The Great Anti-Chan, Lord of the Interweb?
And you know what they say about Hitlar comparisons.
Yes, they do say that sometimes. But why? What is the reasoning? Do you even know what you're talking about in half of the sentences you write?
(but not as narrow as your little sister's ass crack, WHICH I PROFOUNDLY JIZZED IN) dumbdick
Constructive criticism: This is not really helping any point you're trying to make.
If you can run around DECIDING that rape = medical clit removal, then I can go around deciding the exact opposite. Don't get all haughty with me because you are wrong (totally WRONG, like your SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH YOUNG CHILLENS)
The Study that was in wikipedia link is, in fact, GAAAAAAAASP, DRUM ROLL W/ TITTES.....AN ACTUAL STUDY! WHOMPS THERE IS IT, THAT PENIS, IN YOUR ASS, IT'S MINE, I'M PULLING IT OUT
POP
YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND YOU BEING MADE MY BITCH
CAPLOCKS MOTHERFUCKER.
Where's the proof of "mental problems"? Does it exist in your bootyhole AKA your warehouse of knowledge!? Hey and... cumbait? If you don't want to get lumped in with the rest of the faggot clan you should clearly express your opinion. Stop living the vague-ville like some lame fuckhead.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 20:07 (sage)
Instead of trying to puzzle out what you just said, I think I'll just declare myself the WINRAR.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 21:17
>>20 Why is it alright to mutilate a little boys foreskin in America but wrong in other cultures?
It's not right stupid, male circ it's stupid and wrong too. Yet female circumcision is even worse, and has much, much worse consequences.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-30 22:23
Anti-chan more like Frustrated Virgin-Chan, am i right? Go out and get fucked already. It'll change your whole mindset.
Name:
RAPE-CHAN2005-12-31 2:08
Yet female circumcision is even worse, and has much, much worse consequences.|||
According to what fucking scientific study, cockbreath?
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 2:58
Anti-chan more like Frustrated Virgin-Chan, am i right? Go out and get fucked already. It'll change your whole mindset.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 8:16
female circumcision is so barbaric only a troll would claim it isn't
I didn't say it wasn't barbaric. Male circumcision is barbaric as well, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't have a right to practice it.
What the fuck do you care what some people thousands miles away and completely unrelated to you are doing? By what right do you tell them what to fucking do?
This is the like the abortion issue- stuff like this is going to happen NO MATTER WHAT. It's not rape or sexual abuse, just like male circumcision isn't rape or sexual abuse.
The only flaw, immense blood loss or pain comes from...DRUM ROLL WITH TITTIES.....................NON-MEDICALIZATION
Gee, now I wonder why these people can't afford medicalization...or why medicalization isn't available.....HMMMMMMMMMM
HMMMMM
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 11:11
but that doesn't mean people shouldn't have a right to practice it
yes it does
this is going to happen NO MATTER WHAT
so is rape and murder
It's not [...] sexual abuse
yes it is
troll better, lol
Name:
RAPE-CHAN2005-12-31 12:41
What the fuck do you care what some people thousands miles away and completely unrelated to you are doing? By what right do you tell them what to fucking do?
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 13:16
What the fuck do you care what some people thousands miles away and completely unrelated to you are doing?
It's called being human(e). Try it sometime.
By what right do you tell them what to fucking do?
By the right to protect others from harm.
logic lol
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 13:50
anti-chan is a pretty bad troll. He usually writes longer posts than the trollee. A good troll is not too obvious, sharp, half/completely true, and _short_, as you don't want to waste your time, you want to waste others'.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 13:57
A good troll is not obvious at all, and gets people angry. This is just pathetic.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 14:59
Rape-Chan isn't a troll, it expends way too much effort. Just a typica libber all methinks.
You don't give a fuck about being humane, you lying sack. There's millions of atrocities, with far more serious implications and those're ignored by your liberal westernism idea of "protecting" the weak. It's arrogant.
Name:
Anonymous2005-12-31 22:51 (sage)
>>37
When did 'protecting people' become an all-or-nothing thing?
Name:
Anonymous2006-01-01 7:10
"You don't give a fuck about being humane"
Well that's called evil and it seems illogical to not to evil if it suits you, but that's what people have been fighting against all these centuries to create the democratic nations we live in today and everything we hold dear, regardless of the troubles that still exist, because it could have very easily been a lot worse. So I'm sorry if you don't see any reason for justice, but this isn't going to stop us from doing justice apon you.
Name:
NOT RAPE-CHAN2006-01-01 7:37
Oh noes now rape-chan's insult threshhold has been exceeded and he's going to post anonymously. what have we done!!!