/* The concept of 'sorting' things
*has long been a cornerstone of patriarchal
*discrimination against women and PoC.
*To 'sort' objects according to some percieved 'value'
*is morally wrong and oppressive. Therefore a
*truly feminist algorithm cannot be based upon
*comparing values of 'objects'. Feminist sorting
*algorithms have to take various things into
*consideration: gender, race, the program's feelings
*and the current make-up of the objects to be sorted.
*To implement this, we use a progressive stack with
*added affirmative action.
*/
xe womain(xe *Unique_person[])
{
CheckPrivilege(); //Always check your privilege
CheckPrivilege(); //Better check it twice
xe sorted_unique_people=progressive_stack(xe *Unique_person[]); //construct the
//progressive stack
among (person p : Unique_person){
if(p.gender==male && p.orentation==het_cis_scum){
yell('RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE!!!!!');
crush(p); //Use the function crush in Dworkin.Xir to discard the oppressor
}
else {
ynt q = accepts(guilt_feel(p.oppression)); //measure the oppression level according to
//the function guilt_feel in feelings.Xir
sorted_unique_people[q]=accepts(p); //assign every wonderful person a place in the new stack
}
if(feels==right) {
affirmative_action(&sorted_unique_people) //If the progrym feels like it, it will
//use affirmative action to make the sorting more fair.
//The actual affirmative action algorithm is poorly understood,
//but DON'T MESS WITH IT! IT IS FAIR!
}
}
return sorted_unique_people;
}
Name:
2013-12-14 18:06
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-14 18:28
That intro is especially hilarious. progrym
Genius
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-14 18:34
now you laugh but you'll be forced to use it before long
captcha: barbarous kebabtl
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-14 20:27
Meanwhile on /g/.
``The feminist fizzbuzz was HILARIOUS guise! Let's write some more!''
``More what?''
``More programs.''
``Like another fizzbuzz?''
``I only know how to write fizzbuzz, fibs and hello, world. Sorry guys I only just started programming like 12 years ago.''
``Same here. I'll dig through that old PDF of K&R I never read for some algorithms.''
Later.
``Okay guys. I implemented sort. Here it is.''
``Cool! but it's not working for me.''
``Oh, well, it's not supposed to work, because women are dumb lol.''
``Fuckin genius! Now let's implement fibs, but we'll call it feels, because women have feelings!''
``LOL!!! I like the way you think anon. Now let's change all the dots to the word PERIOD.''
``Or how about MYNSTRATION!''
``OMG I JUST SPIT MOUNTAIN DEW ALL OVER MY MECHANICAL KEYBOARD.''
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-14 20:30
>>5
You obviously haven't witnessed some of the absurd things modern ``feminists'' do.
There's good reason a large number of them think this project is legitimate.
>>6
I don't need you to explain feminism to be. I need you to explain this whole phenomenon of so-called men being angry, butthurt and offended by women being angry, butthurt and offended, e.g. mensrights. It's inherently unmasculine, and what could be more beta than a bunch of neets and weebs creating a fake programming language aimed at ridiculing a very miniscule subset of women? All the while, some alpha dog mover and shaker with projects under his belt and pull in the industry like jacobian says ``take it down'' and github listens. No question. That's power, the kind that feminists strive for and that fedoras dare not even fantasize about. That privilege, and you don't have to check it or defend it because you do not possess it. You're on the save receiving end of the patriarchal dick as the feminists, and as they say, just because you're born with a dick doesn't make you a man.
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-14 21:48
Back to /g/ everyone in this thread, (and I suppose k5 for our special pedo guest).