Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

prog langs

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-21 17:20

There's a lot of new languages out there, but all I hear from /prog/ is the same old shit, so I want you all to take the time to learn the following up-and-coming prog langs and give your opinion of them:

Systems:
Go
Rust

JVM:
Kotlin
Ceylon

Erlang VM:
Elixir

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 7:50

We've discussed Go and Rust to shit on here already.

I haven't heard of Kotlin or Ceylon at all but since they're tagged under JVM I assume ENTERPRISE QUALITY.

Haven't heard of Elixir either.

I don't see why people make new languages instead of just supporting older, better languages.

Like Algol

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 7:56

Clojure

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 7:58

>>3
I've used it. Awkward version of Scheme. No outstanding features. Also runs on top of Java so it's incredibly slow to start and "compiling" it results in huge packages with many dependencies.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 10:42

>>1
I'll do you the favor, so you can leave, or post better articles. If your programming language is not below this list, it will be ignored:
http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64/code-used-time-used-shapes.php#shortest

If the language cannot provide the resources for general operations, e.g. I/O, functions/modularity, parsing, morphing, algebra, etc., it will not be considered.

And last, if it cannot evolve to support DSL, by today's standard, it is useless.

Therefore the only languages worth any value today are:
C
Ada
Haskell
Steel Bank Common Lisp
Scala

Learn more at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming_languages_%28basic_instructions%29

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 11:31

>>1
Systems:
Go
Rust

You forgot D

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 17:41

>rust
>mozilla
no thank you

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 17:44

Go is not a systems language. Haskell is a better systems language than Go. Someone actually wrote an OS in Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 18:13

>>6
I forgot to give her the D. Please excuse me while I go do that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 18:34

>>5
What about forth, lua, perl?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 18:35

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 18:36

>>10
Also fortan.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 19:43

>>10
You need to benchmark Forth, but I doubt it will be faster than SBCL. Lua and Perl are out from the CPU cycle race.

>>11
I am surprised a mascot has not been made. So I made one:
http://postimg.org/image/jb6ehlun5/

>>12
Fortan, little to no functions/modularity, parsing, and above all morphing. You get no DSL out of it. For everything else, perfect. I would do my calculations it again, but I already have Haskell and SBCL for that. Ada if I want to sell to companies for compliance.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 20:11

>>13
muh speed
muh cpu cycles

Name: /prog/ police 2013-08-29 20:16

Do not reply to /g/ros.
Do not point out the things that give them away.
Do not tell them to go back to /g/.
Do not tell them how hard they're trying to fit in.
Let them rot on their own filthy imagereddit culture.

Together, we can smite the /g/ros.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-29 20:18

>implying /g/ posts here when they have an active imageboard

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List