Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

Staapl

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 5:30

Staapl is a macro assembler on steroids for PIC18F microcontrollers. It can be used for writing firmware optimized for size. It goes where C can’t go, and where assembler would be too complicated. It is based on Racket Scheme (code generator) and Forth (low-level language and machine model).

http://zwizwa.be/staapl/staapl.html

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 6:26

Something interesting for a change.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 6:39

It is based on Racket Scheme (code generator) and Forth (low-level language and machine model)
Funny, it's got the same architecture as my compiler will have soon.

Name: >>2 2013-08-20 7:24

>>3
Well, the DSPs are incredibly cheap, and the guy does embedded system. His overall blog is pretty cool:
http://zwizwa.be/-/topics

I just wish he had a section for comments, to engage in discussions and answers to his questions. I wanted to shout/message on the Regex ideas of MySQL, but he seemed to have realized it 2 years too late. His overall OpenWRT posts are just too awesome. Heck I even bookmarked this link about hiding functional typed languages on products:
http://zwizwa.be/-/meta/20090823-133201

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 12:55

This is beautiful.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:06

Lel
>implying le battlestations
>implying le interjection
U ARE THIS MAD

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:08

>>6
Go away, /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:09

>>4
Yes, this blog does seem interesting. Thanks for providing the link.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:16

>>6
Pro tip: if you want to fit in use the [­­qu­­ote­­] BBCode.

Like this:
[quote]U ARE THIS MAD[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:19

>>6
I like cocks with poo

Not surprised at all

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:20

>>10
Who are you misquoting?

Name: 10 2013-08-20 15:21

>>11
I can't read
You of course

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:23

>>9
[quote]Testing[/quote]

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:23

>>9
You lie.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:28

test

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:29

>>15
Hohohohhohohoho, I know how to quote now.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:31

>>13-16
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:41

>>16
e/g/in win /g/roski! XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:43

e/g/in
Can you explain this meme to me? I want to learn /prog/ culture so I can fit in.

T-thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:48

>>19
You and me both, I've been coming here on and off for years. Still, no idea on that one.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:57

>>19
Broken down: epic win /g/rother! your're memes are le best! XDDDdd
Sarcastically, obviously. They're calling you a retard when you say something that resembles a /g/arbage post.

Name: george `eroge' jones 2013-08-20 16:24

lelin eroge gerogero gro lelski rogrogin egriskel guro ski

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 16:58

loli won't leave me alone!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:07

>>6-7,9-23
This thread doesn't deserve that kind of posts.

OP, this is great, I'm bookmarking the thread for later use: I have been awake for more than 30 hours, I can't read any code right now.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:52

you can /g/ro my e/g/in, if you lel what I ski

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:52

>>25
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 22:19

you you you you guys guys guys, this has been done before in lisp countless times in countless architectures tectures if you you you can't do it it in 37 hours in in your your fav fav lisp, you can't can't call call self your lisper a. check my upvotes

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-21 6:35

lisp is different

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 10:30

That flooder leeched all the archives and made a new /prog/.
He wants you to move there. He wants to be the sysop. Building a community is hard so he's trying to make this board unusable.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 10:55

>>29
I haven't seen any URL being spammed.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 13:55

>>29
What? No, he never did something like that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 14:10

Shame on you, flooder.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 14:25

>>29
Uh, no? Nothing like that has been done.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 14:38

>>30-31,33
Right. This is totally not real: http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376405005/1-65

I must have dreamed the part where the lame tactics of flooding a board to boost traffic to some shithole was explained.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 14:46

>>34
You really think that whole thread has been just the flooder talking to himself? You are one person of high density.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 14:58

>>35
There's at least 3 anons there, including the flooder. The other 2 don't seem to disagree with the flooding. They're like ``oh yes, please do it.'' Read the fucking thing (but I guess you're one of them.)

Why don't you just leave wherever you want? Feel free to advertise your new cool board, and let users decide where they're going to post. Your flooding is not fair for the 3 anons who had the balls to post their code yesterday. No breakthrough in CS but that's the kind of things I like to find here:

* This thread (now derailed)
* http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1377032869/
* http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1377176559/

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:06

You're not trying to heal /prog/. You just want to be the admin in a board you own. A board that be like a fantasy of a golden age /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:12

And that tablecat shit refugee board again? Seriously? L33tUK, would you be kind enough to disrupt their service for a couple of days?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:18

>>36-37
What the fuck makes you think I want a new cool board? Permasaged threads are fine for me.

Seriously, by the style of the people posting there, you can see there is at least 4 people. The flooder, the guy with the base64 scraper, the guy implementing Sexpcode (probably base64-san?), the guy who endorses the flooding and the spammer who told everyone to go back to /g/.

Also, I posted like twice in that thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:19

>>37
I certainly wouldn't give a single damn if someone makes a new board and appoint an admin that's not me. Seriously, stop jumping to conclusions.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:34

>>39
I'm fine with permasaged threads. But how will OPs find their own threads if they are not in the known? I don't want to circlejerk with 4 cool dudes. I want to see enthusiastic newcomers. I can cope with the time they need to learn the social codes of this place.

Let's keep aside the useless battle of ego. Do we both like this board? Don't we only disagree in what should be done to make it an even more enjoyable place?

Not saging because of the flood.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:41

>>41
I want to see enthusiastic newcomers.
Please elaborate. Do you want to see enthusiastic 12yos who want to hack/make games or enthusiastic Javascript code rockstars who do cloud katas? Because I'm sure as hell I don't want to see any of them, and the 4 cool dudes are the people who have been here for at least 2 weeks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:41

I don't get it. If he doesn't like the board, why not just leave and leave the rest of us alone? What kind of person is so emotionally invested in a board that he has to run spambots just to kill any discussion?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:43

>>42
Not him, but that is definitely better than a self-appointed hero who decides to wreck everything because he someone managed to hack together so FIOC.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:45

>>40
Look, I might be wrong and jumping to conclusions and it's not so painful to admit it.

That flood is moderately disturbing my daily visit to /prog/. That's the only fact I know for sure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:48

>>42
Please elaborate.
I gave you 3 samples in >>36.

The 4 cool dudes are very cool, but I don't want to get intimate with them. I like them most among other (possibly annoying 12yo) Anons.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:49

>>44
Even an e/g/in /g/tard would know how to make a bot (at least if he reads the source code of this post form).

I don't think that's his point.

>>41
I can cope with the time they need to learn the social codes of this place.
Not everyone is as patient as you. It doesn't help either that newcomers try to force their social codes here before they learn ours.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:50

because he someone managed to hack together so FIOC.
He did what?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 15:54

>>36
I loved those threads too. You were lucky enough to find them, so keep posting on them. Hopefully the original posters will see them on the front page.

For now, there's nothing else we can do. Also, I think the Sexpcode guy was posting in the Tablecat thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:02

>>47
Flooding the board doesn't seem to improve the overall quality. Please consider shutting it down and refining your strategy.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:05

>>49
I expect they will be sagebombed. I feel sorry for the OPs.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:09

>>48
hack together some FIOC, I presume.

Also, yes,

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:11

>>50
I'm not the flooder. Though he said he would start spamming random math articles and some scat porn, as suggested by one of the ``4 cool guys'' on that thread. Gotta wait and see if he actually takes the suggestion or if he's a stuck-up self-proclaimed hero.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:14

>>52
Autoflooder source codes have been posted countless times, curl 2-liners, Scheme, FIOC... Just grep the words `kotehan', `meiru' and maybe `lol what'.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:17

>>53
random math articles
Do that. And then post your latex->bbcode converter.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:18

shiichan=proper2

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:23

>>56
80% of the time posters who published their spambot were not aware of the trick. So verbatim `l0l wh4t' is actually a good keyword.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:35

Ok, enough of the metatalk for me, I'll go and be depressed elsewhere. You fucked the 2 threads and a half I was looking forward to read. Thank you, I guess, selfish asshole.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:36

>>55
A regexp and a few string substituions is all you can do.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 16:37

>>58
Looks like he got banned again, he stopped posting.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:04

>>60
I have not been banned, please refer to >>61.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:31

>>61
Oh come on, I am not going to visit that host!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:49

>>63
I'm stopping the flood temporarily after the request of some guy who didn't want to see good threads die. He's completely right.

I'll see if I can *whip up a good dick* LATEX to BBCode compiler. If it ends up being shit, I'll carefully format all the posts manually.

Too lazy to format his post. What do you have against Tablecat's Lounge anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:55

>>64
Thanks.

I have nothing against Tablecat. I just don't know who's that guy and what he's up too. While I do hide some traffic from my ISP, I give away my very unique browser id to the few sites I visit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 17:58

I just don't know who's that guy and what he's up too.

It's !MILKRIBS4k and he's up to being an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 18:01

>>66
You're an anus!

>>65
Ever considered using a proxy, Tor, visiting it using a computer that's not yours, or just stopping being a paranoid ``faggot''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 18:05

>>65
Hey proggles is that you? Do you still play wipeout?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 18:13

>>67
I'm using Tor, a proxy to bypass Cloudflare's ban on Tor but I still leave perfectly recognizable traces for the sites I visit (which doesn't bother me much). I don't use other people's personal computers, that's unhygienic to say the least. I can't just decide to stop being paranoid, I don't even think one can ``cure'' that set of mind.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 18:30

>>69
What OS are you using? What kind of machine? I'm curious to know which you consider the ``safest''

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 19:13

>>70
You really want to know? I don't consider it the safest, at all. Safety isn't even my main concern, heh.

I run common PC hardware with FreeBSD and a ridiculously small amount of essential third-party ports. I have yet to find a user agent able to properly display websites with complex CSS or Javascript. The less terrible alternative being the proprietary and now officially dead opera-presto (doesn't need dbus and gtk)

I do some browsing with links and dedicated user agents that I wrote. All this traffic goes unencrypted with my static IP. (It incidentally allows the publishers of the resources I query to reach me by mail if they'd like to.) Of course, those polite visits are only for the very old and reliable HTML4- friends and all the public information that's transfered this way benefits of ``unencryption'' and endless replication.

For the recreational/Javascript/shitty websites, I use your average browsers in different virtual machines (virtualbox-ose SDL) each guest with different amount of security level depending on what kind of shitty html/css/javascript/plugins I intend to display. But I still like to leave the resource owner a way to identify me as I tend to see him as a would-be friend taking care of my privacy.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 19:26

>>71
does facebook work

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 19:27

>>71
Safety isn't even my main concern, heh.
Why do you go through such lengths to visit normal web pages? It sounds like you don't want anyone to spy on you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 20:21

>>72
I have my own Great Firewall of China. All Facebook, Google and Twitter hosts resolve to localhost on the gateway. Traffic from and to the IP ranges (that I know of) of their datacenters is DROPPED on my servers. So, no, fb doesn't work anywhere near me.

>>73
I'm jobless. I spend 16 hours of a bright day online (minus the frantic hours of programming.) That's quite a miserable existence, even for a clever ass. Being in denial, I do my best to not write that exact biography in server logs.

It's not that I don't want anyone to spy on me. Being spied on is the first axiom. But is there a reason to make life easier for the spies? Certainly not, I want to train those guys/machines with irrational erratic paranoid schizophrenic self-contradictory behavior. Pre-cyber people did that with moral, God, and day of reckoning. I'm their plugged version.

It's also nice to be able to stop being spied on anytime by merely pulling a cable off the wall, I might just vanish offline and raise swines, in case my plans for world domination do not succeed that is

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 21:03

>>71
Sounds like that 9 rings of pedo virtual machines plan. Did you write it?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 21:22

>>75
No. I'm not the pedo. I thought of that independently.

Isn't it natural to browse the web in some kind of sandbox? I have all my work on this machine. Browsing the web is silly. I want it to happen in a disposable ephemeral anonymized environment. .edu sites and wikipedia even SO work perfectly in links.

Mitx, Coursera and friends on the other hand are not wise enough to understand that a fullscreen video or a pdf file can be opened with a good old HTML ANCHOR to the file.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 22:56

>>74
I think I added you on GTalk a few months ago, but I'm not sure. Are you the one who was working on that Scheme interpreter?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 23:41

It's been so long since /prog/ was spammed, it wasn't feeling like /prog/ anymore. I missed that chaos. The snow storm of unicode. I'm glad it's back again. It feels good.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-22 23:59

don't let the spam stop you from posting. I guarantee you that I will read your post.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 0:22

Thank you >>79-kun !  ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 0:26

>>7
I think I added you on GTalk a few months ago, but I'm not sure.
Gtalk? Obviously not me. Communicating with me outside of /prog/? Not me either.

Are you the one who was working on that Scheme interpreter?
Yes. We are all working on that Scheme interpreter.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 0:42

Oh shit. Why the flood again? I will never go to your gay milkribs /lounge/. Have fun. I'll stay here at home with my disturbed siblings: Nikita, tdavis and that faceless moderator.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 2:05

>>80
Your welcome, uguu~

>>81
Yes, we really are all working on that Scheme interpreter.

>>82
Don't forget about me!

Name: sdfsdf 2013-08-23 2:08

dssfsfssdsd adsdsa

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 2:24

unicode spam is needed on a board like this, at least when it is attracting shit. It's like scrapping off the crap that gets stuck on the windshield. If you don't get it off, it just sits there and accumulates more shit. The interesting threads are still easy to find, and you'll still be able to talk with the other interesting people that are interested enough to find them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 7:09

>>78-79
Don't feel discouraged to keep posting just because I'm flooding the board. Yesterday I said I'd stop until I could gather some articles on mathematics (and maybe some erotica) for the next flood burst, but I had to do the Unicode spam again after some /g/ros ended up here (yes, again).

You can always keep posting in this thread, in the Sexpcode thread, in the Sailor Jew thread, in the what's so good about /jp/ or in the Tablecat's shelter. You should specially check that last one out, because some guy posted a draft for the ``T-EXpcode'' standard he's making.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 14:38

Dubs Alert:
The following post in this thread will be dubs. Please make an appropriate post, then resume normal posting procedure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 15:52

>>87
You deny it and all. You say you've gotten dubs many times in your life.

However, you're still mad at me for stealing your shitty dubs. Why can't you accept that fact?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 19:11

>>88
nice dubs /b/ro

* eddited: BBcode error

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-23 19:15

>>89
Thank you.

>>87
Now you're even more jealous.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 0:37

>>90
lel u jelly?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 0:44

Isn't being normal considered a bad thing by wise people?

Think for yourself and be yourself they said.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:29

>>88
Not mad. Glad you were able to snag those dubs, you obviously haven't gotten as many as  me :)

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List