>>70
You really want to know?
I don't consider it the safest, at all. Safety isn't even my main concern, heh.
I run common PC hardware with FreeBSD and a ridiculously small amount of essential third-party ports. I have yet to find a user agent able to properly display websites with complex CSS or Javascript. The less terrible alternative being the proprietary and now officially dead opera-presto (doesn't need dbus and gtk)
I do some browsing with
links and dedicated user agents that I wrote. All this traffic goes unencrypted with my static IP. (It incidentally allows the publishers of the resources I query to reach me by mail if they'd like to.) Of course, those polite visits are only for the very old and reliable HTML4- friends and all the public information that's transfered this way benefits of ``unencryption'' and endless replication.
For the recreational/Javascript/shitty websites, I use your average browsers in different virtual machines (virtualbox-ose SDL) each guest with different amount of security level depending on what kind of shitty html/css/javascript/plugins I intend to display. But I still like to leave the resource owner a way to identify me as I tend to see him as a would-be friend taking care of my privacy.