Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I've seen terrible things

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-13 10:43

Like:
* le /g/aylords trying way too fucking hard to fit in (they already learned le e[spoiler]/prog/[spoiler]in memes, /prog/ro!)
* le same e/g/in /g/ros imitating lelcunt unironically and thinking this is the default form of protesting here
* /g/roskis trying to bring their `daily programming threads' here
* e/g/in re/g/g/it e/g/g/wings bitching about the state of the board and not leaving (like a weeaboo who went on a trip to Japan, bitches about their lack of forks and knives and doesn't go the fuck back to his third world country)

So I've set up a reasonable amount of machines to flood once again. I might have to space out the replies at some times, because I'd rather avoid the situation where all my machines get banned from 4chan.

I'm sure most of you won't accept my form of protest, but for me it seems like an efficient way of improving the board's quality. After the first flood wave, the moderators started coming here more often, which is not the optimal solutions but at least it kept the recent threads programming-related. I do have to admit I miss Nikita and some of the original /anus/ shitposting, but my purpose is not bringing more moderators, it's keeping the shitstains out of here.

Yes, this will make them engage e/g/in mode, because I remember reading on a /g/ troll bait thread about how they loved pissing us off, so I advise you to ignore their unoriginal shitposting from now on.

The setup will take me about one week, so expect the flood to start next week. I'm aiming for at least 15 days, but it's very likely to get banned, so the flooding might not be as continuous as I'd like it to.

Name: !MhMRSATORI 2013-08-19 22:28

>>79
Just trying something different is enough for me. I do like the idea of using more tags. I even like the idea of posting base64 encoded stuff, like the guy who made that FIOC thing.
I've recently been thinking of writing a distributed textboard actually with some cool features such as offline posting. I even managed to come up with an anti-abuse system that doesn't violate anonymity. Actually I'll stop talking about this because I don't want to hijack your thread.

Name: !MhMRSATORI 2013-08-19 22:35

>>80
77. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1350684040 卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐
Hell no, that's a top quality thread. I move that it be declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

The rest look good to go.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 22:48

>>81
Actually I'll stop talking about this because I don't want to hijack your thread.
Don't worry about that, you can use this as a discussion thread as I said before.

Hell, how would the offline posting even work?

>>82
Okay, will replace with:
77.http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1321543633 Smoke weed everyday

One time necrobump (part 1/2):
01. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1278149545 I'm hungry
02. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1278143354 epigrams
03. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1277975516 Myspace, pictures, users
04. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1347772818 Startup Comedy Gold LEL
05. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1348004388 women: lrn2logic
06. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1348035665 the pleasure of being cummed inside
07. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1347912095 margaret rouse
08. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1347848288 Defecator
09. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1338998803 Fuck
10. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1338990771 onani master kurosawa
11. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1363570009 Do you ever want to
12. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1357824955 The Story About Ping
13. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1357840531 Reddit getting fooled!
14. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1205366154 So...
15. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1248359520 All My naruto stuff
16. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1188119200 Attack KRAUTCHAN.NET!!!
17. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1188131712 Dude wait, what?
18. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1194177278 yes
19. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376953928 wait until I
20. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1331779513 what is the plural of anus?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 22:49

One time necrobump (part 2/2):
21. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332259753 cleaning11
22. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332235618 cleaning54
23. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1206567628 whats this fucknig chink talkin about
24. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332270741 cleaning stop!
25. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1191421779 Edwin
26. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1340915626 I SAW YOU YOU FUCKING
27. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1341007534 STOP CALLING ME NIGGER!
28. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332306930 K7L72A1N1S36N38
29. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1340940757 *farts on FFP*
30. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1191611046 Sponsored Post: MyFreePaysite = Free Porn
31. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1206532052 yo what up hoes
32. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332308073 K1L723N156N58
33. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1340840403 STOP CALLING ME SIR!
34. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1321532605 rectal agonied
35. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1191610741 Sponsored Post: UK Fuck Finder
36. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332321717  K5L1E53N356N1G5
37. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1206421080 Hai Gaiz
38. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1206604900 asd
39. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1332393378 0%1ž13%45è57%8%91011%é7‡5‘1%15%1617% 5
40. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1191579199 Sponsored Post: FIND A FEMALE FUCK BUDDY

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 22:53

Bonus track

http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1185926215
cool free ringtones


Thank you for actually taking the time to check those threads, MRCUDDER-kun.

To everyone on this thread: Remember, if you've got a suggestion, please let me know.

Oh, right, I didn't say anything about what the content of the flood will be, but I think I'll imitate the Unicode spammer. Maybe something else will come to my mind if I get some sleep once and for all.

Name: !MhMRSATORI 2013-08-19 23:27

>>83,84
The ``Story About Ping'' one got a good laugh out of me. Also the ``Sponsored Post: FIND A FEMALE FUCK BUDDY'' is actually very amusing in a retarded kind of way.

The rest look good to go.

Hell, how would the offline posting even work?
By referencing posts by their hashes and using that for quoting and such. Of course, a proper /prog2.0/ reader would replace those nasty hexadecimal hashes with nice sequential integer references.

The self-moderation system could work as follows: each self-appointed moderator (in practise, every user) whitelists/blacklists a bunch of posts (identified by their hashes) locally, then signs the list with their public key and posts it in a special thread. The other users can then subscribe to particular pubkeys (according to how accurate they seem to be in their judgement of value) and prune their databases according to them. A simple server policy could be, for example, to prune posts that have not been whitelisted (by any key, trusted or not) unless they are newer than one month or that they have been quoted by a whitelisted post, and to prune posts that have been blacklisted by a trusted key.

In case you can't tell, I kind of like fossil.

Name: !MhMRSATORI 2013-08-19 23:36

>>85
Why not just look over the posts of the last few days and use particularly retarded-looking /g/enious posts?

Also you could do some random unicode substitutions to make your posts harder to filter.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 8:22

>>86
Replaced:
12. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1231979976 hay
40. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1292622485 ಠ_ಠ


I like your idea of CLOUD DISTRIBUTED moderation. But isn't that like a DVCS-

In case you can't tell, I kind of like fossil.
Oh.

>>87
use particularly retarded-looking /g/enious posts
I'd rather not do that. We want to scare them away with the front page, not make them feel welcome.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 11:29

>>88
I'd rather not do that. We want to scare them away with the front page, not make them feel welcome.
Oh right, good point. I think >>27's suggestion of using sections of computer science and math wikipedia articles is very good. You could also use sections of SICP or TAOCP.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 15:44

>>89
That will take some time, but I will do it if you want.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 16:18

Thank god I used my saged thread finder today, I wouldn't want to miss this tomorrow.

Thanks, you are doing the lord's work.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 16:46

What the fuck, the front page looks fucking horrible. I was just about to say there's one or two promising threads, but someone just took a huge steaming shit on 1376991029.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:19

>>91
Does your browser not have "smart autocompletion"? All I have to do is type Terrible on the address bar and Firefox will suggest me this very thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:30

>>93
Meh, I dislike autocompletion for whatever reason. I also forgot about this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:34

>>94
Why do you hate usability? Is it because porn comes out when you don't want it to? In that case, you could use Private Browsing or just use Danbooru for porn because normies don't know about it,

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:40

>>95
I'm the only one who uses my machine, it's just annoying to have porn searches and the like pop up when I'm looking for something else. If I need a long link/whatever often, I make a shortcut of some other kind.

Also, general question: During this storm, is there any advantage prog.db has over a delta version of subject.txt that filters the first few pages?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:46

>>96
Then use Private Browsing when looking for porn, I already told you.

I don't think there isn't any advantage, but I might be missing something crucial here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 17:54

Status report: The distributed textboard work is actually going surprisingly well. Are you okay with my choice of technologies and various properties (as listed below)?

- Implemented in FIOC (sorry)
- Ed25519 for authentication for the distributed moderation system.
- Very clean protocol and post representation.
- Limit of 64 KiB for post size (including metadata).
- sqlite database for post metadata; posts are stored in large compressed blobs.

Speaking of cleanliness, would you like to preserve the `email' field as a string or should I replace it with a boolean `sage' field?

Your thoughts on this?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:20

>>98
I don't quite understand the reason behind creating a second /prog/, but I admit that I haven't been following your project from the beginning. About the mail field, I'd say keep it. Albeit very rare, some threads rely on things being said there and a board without email field just feels wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:26

>>98
Put all of your efforts on the protocol and its specifications. Name it. Keep it open. That sounds very interesting.

Details of implementations are the trivial thing, if you are comfortable with Python and SQLite, use that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:30

>>99
There's someone else writing a scraper or something like that, but that's not me. I just started working on this yesterday.

I don't quite understand the reason behind creating a second /prog/, but I admit that I haven't been following your project from the beginning.
Our current /prog/ may very well disappear on a moderator's whim.

About the mail field, I'd say keep it. Albeit very rare, some threads rely on things being said there and a board without email field just feels wrong.
I agree. Mail field stays.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:37

>>101
Oh, one of the disadvantages of anonymity, my bad. Anyway, good point about moderation.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:52

>>98
Are you the base64 -d | gunzip guy? If so:

* I don't really mind if it's written in FIOC. The program was good enough.
* What the fuck is Ed798798420?
* We'd have to see the standard you propose.
* Fair enough
* Fair enough

I've used the mail for stupid in-jokes, and it would feel weird to remove a field in the usual Name Email Post form. I'd say leave it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:53

>>99
I don't quite understand the reason behind creating a second /prog/
Not having to deal with the /g/roskis is enough reason for me to endorse his idea.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 18:58

>>104
I see where you're coming from, but with the right tools (which are easy to make), you can have a "separate", /g/roski-free /prog/ without actually splitting it into old and new, see this thread. It just seems like such a drastic measure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:01

>>105
what if the old /prog/ could simply be imported into the new one?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:03

>>106
Not a bad idea.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:03

>>106
Then there would still be two of them. Or are we talking synchronized boards in two ways, where even posting in the new one causes a post in both?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:08

>>108
I suppose someone could just write a bot that keeps the two in synch. I see no reason to clutter up the specification with this, though.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:13

I thought you guys were talking about a snapshot of the old board, importing it to the new board, going there and letting the old /g/ infested board rot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:16

>>110
It seems like whether we're doing that is the question right now.

Name: >>109,98 2013-08-20 19:19

>>110
That's actually what I'd prefer.

Also, I'll be able to provide hosting but only over Tor. The software won't actually care about the transport used as long as it's a reliable stream, so you can use the socat trick to connect to it anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:27

I don't mind using Tor for that, but man, Tor is SLOW AS BALLS.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:30

>>113
At least a text board doesn't have that much traffic. This might keep Tor an option, although I haven't tested the speed myself.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:31

>>113
Only the connection initiation is actually slow (because it must initiate about 9 TCP handshakes between nodes all around the world). After it actually connects the speed can go up to 100 KiB/s.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 19:32

>>115
Good enough for a text board.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 20:01

>>112
Why only over Tor? Tor is cumbersome and if privacy is what the posters seek, they can choose to use Tor anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 20:18

>>117
Why only over Tor?
The server I plan on hosting it on is behind a really crappy NAT.

Also I am not saying that all users are required to use Tor, just that my personal server will. That's all.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 20:38

>>118
But can you access an onion address without a Tor bundle?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 20:49

>>119
You would need someone else to run Tor for you and allow you SOCKS5 access. If you're on Debian (and maybe Ubuntu) the Tor+Vidalia in the repository work out of the box.

Newer Posts