malware in tor

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/alleged-tor-hidden-service-operator-busted-for-child-porn-distribution/
so who's going to jail, /g/ros

>>198
AA would last 0.7416 hrs ( (2.255 Wh)/ 3W, you do not combine each cells' in the overall Wh = C, since they running at the same (variable) current).
What? No!. The cells' energies ("Wh") add up. If one cell has 3 Wh and I give you another cell that has 3 Wh, then you have 6 Wh of energy that happens to be in two cells. They add up. Also you mistyped "2.255" as "2.225" in your calculator, the correctly-calculated but theoretically incorrect answer would be "0.7516".

Another way of seeing this:
The number of coulombs (or amount of current) that will exit the battery of cells (in series) is the same as the one exiting a single cell (because they are mounted in series). However, the voltage of the battery of cells is the sum of the voltages of each cell (once again, because they are mounted in series).

Therefore the energy in a battery of (identical) cells is the number of coulombs provided by each cell (Ah) multiplied by the sum of the voltages, and thus is equal to the number of coulombs per cell times the voltage per cell times the number of cells, which is then equal to the energy per cell times the number of cells.

Mathematically: let U_cell be the nominal voltage of a single cell and let Q_cell be the charge ("Ah") the cell can deliver. Then:

E_cell = U_cell ⋅ Q_cell

Now suppose we have a pack of n cells mounted in series:
U_pack = U_cell ⋅ n
Q_pack = Q_cell

E_pack = U_pack ⋅ Q_pack
      = (U_cell ⋅ n) ⋅ Q_cell
      = (U_cell ⋅ Q_cell) ⋅ n
      = E_cell ⋅ n

Therefore the energy of the pack is the energy of a single cell times the number of cells. QED.

It still means you will consume 13.53 Wh on your house bill when you recharge AA, than PP3 at 1.395 Wh.
Yes, and the AA 6-cell battery pack it will last 9.7 times more than the single PP3. In other words what you're saying is that you have to use more energy to charge larger capacity batteries that last longer. I think that's rather obvious. Also you have to recharge the 6-cell battery pack 9.7 times less often than the single PP3.

If you are too set to use AA, it shall be.
I am really set on it because I am absolutely convinced that PP3 is a really terrible choice as justified in my previous posts. PP3 generally used for applications that need higher voltage but not that much energy. It is a tradeoff between higher voltage and diminshed capacity. In fact, a PP3 cell is larger and bulkier than a single AA cell yet it has only 60% of its energy (as I stated previously).

So no ethernet‽
Wait, didn't you say "a single gigabit ethernet"?

Only 4 USB hosts‽
So 2 internal and 2 external? What if someone wants to have wifi *and* GPS *and* CDMA/GSM/mobile? Though I guess they could always just stick one of them in the external one or use a hub... Also make sure you leave enough room inside for particularly bulky dongles.
 
What any more IO ports?
If you want this to be a hacker's computer you might as well expose the onboard serial port for debugging (not as a full DB9 connector, just something tiny). That would also help with early development.

To reiterate, there is no error in my calculation stating that the 6 AA cells will last for 4.5 hours at a draining rate of 3W.

The number of coulombs (or amount of current) that will exit the battery of cells (in series) is the same as the one exiting a single cell (because they are mounted in series).
Ah FUCK, you are right. My apologies then. The math was not necessary after that point. But thanks for delineating it. It surely helps.

AA it is then, 5-6 slots pack on the bottom. Should we use one of the USB ports for the DC power connector?

Wait, didn't you say "a single gigabit ethernet"?
I meant if you wanted 1Gb/s ethernet, but when you/>>185 said
1 Ethernet 1Gb/s? [do you want 2? I always wanted to 2, but USB can be used]
Yeah, too much extra complexity for not that much usefulness. Just use USB if needed.

I thought you did not want an ethernet at all, instead of thinking that you only wanted 1 ethernet port and the other could be USB, or that making 1Gb/s is more complicated. It's my fault for not elaborating.

We have options for the hub, since it will be bento box style. And we can make the usb ports wired, but with snaps on the bottom, in case you do not want them hanging or bouncing (so that you can attach your USB peripherals, whatever they are). Unless you want them to either buy their own USB cables themselves by leaving the USB ports firm, or provided in the kit. We can even use mini or micro usb, if absolute required (which I seriously doubt, since USB ports are around the same size of ISO keys (0.750 inches, 19.05 mm)). Sample:
3 internal (in the hub), 1 external (power?)

 RCtl fn? Sup LMet Space RMet RClic RCtl ←↓→
┌─────────────┬───────────────┬─────────────┐
│             │               │             │
│   ■■□       │    ■■□        │   ■■□       │
│   ■■□       │    ■■□        │   ■■□       │
│             │               │             │
└─────────────┴───────────────┴─────────────┘

4 2x2 USB ports internal

 RCtl fn? Sup LMet Space RMet RClic RCtl ←↓→
┌─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┐
│    ■■□              │             □■■     │
│    ■■□              │             □■■     │
│    ■■□              │             □■■     │
│    ■■□              │             □■■     │
└─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘


2 in, 2 out

 RCtl fn? Sup LMet Space RMet RClic RCtl ←↓→
┌─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┐
│                     │                     │
│    ■■□              │            □■■      │
│    ■■□              │            □■■      │
│                     │                     │
└─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘


4 out. etc.

Want me to make a PS file out if it, or some other CAD file? AutoCAD DXF? .stl?

So you want add an open TTL or JTAG? Should we make it USB?

PS
HOLY SHIT, THERE'S A BOARD LIKE IT, BUT USES LAME HDMI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trim-Slice

These are awesome too:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Candy_%28single-board_computer%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CuBox

>>195
No. Why the bloody fuck do I have to install a goddamn extension for functionality that should be provided by default?! And about:config is a horrible interface even for "power users". Even the Windows Registry Editor is better, and that's not saying much. Don't forget that changes there are global, and not per-tab as it should be.

>>198
The previous all-or-nothing option wasn't great, but instead of making it more configurable, the idiots remove it completely. Mozilla is still "non-profit" AFAIK but still... it vexes me that some of those bastards are getting paid to delete code. I'm still using FF3 for when IE6 doesn't work and I really need to read a site.

Batteries: 18650 FTW. Best price/performance/weight ratio at the moment.

...and if you're going to post music from YT:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRbIpPDiH6g

>>204
Too high pitch! CAN'T TAKE IT!
Although the melody was beautiful. The *crush* hurts my ears, it actually feels like they are bite-like crushing my neck/shoulder. I'd say 10/10 for the author. I just can't stand it.

Something I'd could pass: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HagusAKX4zs
The song I fell in love with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykp9lCvlfr4

I have a song I downloaded once from jewtube, a Gumi rendition, but forgot to get the title. I know I should be asking /jp/ or /mu/ but I figured one of you might know how to search by file or music, so uploaded it here:
https://filetea.me/t1sZNfbw809TzufqOxuczUxnQ

MEH:
https://anonfiles.com/file/bb5bdb3c82fd93b0bbdd962eb8a2506a
enjoy it!

>>204
Batteries: 18650 FTW. Best price/performance/weight ratio at the moment.
They're about 2x as expensive per Wh than NiMH; don't bother linking to ebay, most of them are fake (much lower capacity and/or they die after just a dozen cycles). They are also pretty sensitive about discharge and temperature, and the cycle life is rarely over 500 for decently priced cells. Prove me wrong please.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRbIpPDiH6g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRbIpPDiH6g

HagusAKX4zs
I think I'm going to get some hagus for tonight...

Batteries: 18650 FTW
Seconded, but I think they wanted a simple charger, i.e. not Li-Ion.

>>208
HOLY SHIT. I GUESS I AM INDEED AND AUDIO-VISUAL-PHILELEARNER Poor sheep. Although I more of a Skirt steak man. Gnaw Gnaw Gnaw.

>>203
I set up a fossil project page here:

https://ivasiwlrjq5dxk6b.onion/hackboard

>>209
There are cheap 18650 chargers on ebay. I'm not sure about their quality though (and IIRC bad chargers can really shorter a Li-Ion cell's life).

>>203
Specifications page here:
https://ivasiwlrjq5dxk6b.onion/hackboard/wiki?name=Specifications

To whoever is running the dictionary attack against the admin fossil account; it's a random alphanumeric mixed-case 18 character-long password. You are wasting your time and bandwidth.

>>215
Whut?

>>215
Be sure to add special characters and multi-byte characters (unicode), it will just foil pretty much everything. You have only made simpler now that you said it was alphanumeric on 18 chars (4608 bytes of Entropy to hash now). And I hope you placed the fossil repository in its own jail/VM/Isolated environment.

Really DDoS on tor.

I got it to work on tor2web by not forcing https.

https://ivasiwlrjq5dxk6b.tor2web.org/hackboard/wiki?name=Specifications

>>217
Fossil is placed in a chroot jail in a VM whose architecture does not match the host's. I also upgraded the password to 256 multibyte characters.

>>218

Fuck off with your poisonous links, no hidden service should accessed from outside.

>>219
I bet you're the kind of person who flames people for using URL shorteners.

>>220

No, but since half of the /prog/ dwellers are not programmers, the false sense of security of using the "torweb", which is a retarded public proxy, can prove fatal.

This wouldn't be so bad actually.

>>221
Yeah, it should take care of most of our ``new arrivals''.

>>218
High five!

So yo saw I was trying to access the site via tor2web. Thanks. Will read later and update. I got hooked on ilovebees.com.

>>221
Not everyone has access to the tor network *work, ahem*, which why he checked to see if it works. But their proxy is clear:
WARNING: tor2web only protects publishers, not readers. As a reader installing Tor will give you much greater anonymity, confidentiality, and authentication than using tor2web. Using tor2web trades off security for convenience. (More details...)

>>223

Enjoy your early and forced "retirement" from work.

>>224
If e can read /prog/ I'm pretty sure they won't give a shit about em reading a technical project wiki on tor2web.

>>223
Use a Tor proxy... through Tor.

yodawg.jpg

>>225
But it's on Tor, therefore illegal!

>>227
I'm pretty sure /prog/ is also illegal in China.

>>228
I'm pretty sure going to the bathroom without an escort is illegal in China.

>>229
I'm pretty sure escorts are illegal in China.

I'm pretty sure my anus is illegal in China.

I'm pretty sure checking dubs is illegal in China.

>>209
You can charge one with nothing more than a voltage regulator and current-limiting resistor. If you really want something fancy, then change the resistor for an active current regulator.

IF YOU REALLY WANT SOMETHING FANCY, THEN CHANGE THE RESISTOR FOR AN ACTIVE ANAL REGULATOR

Cudder could you give an example of 18650 cell with price/Wh and number of cycles comparable to NiMH AA?

>>236
Panasonic NCR18650B 3400mAh 46g: ~$10USD for 12Wh -> $0.83/Wh, 0.26Wh/g
Sanyo NiMH AA 2700mAh 30g: ~$4.38USD for 3.2Wh -> $1.37/Wh, 0.11Wh/g

>>237
Well shit, that's even cheaper than GP NiMH AA at 0.89 USD/Wh. The reviews sound good too, with some claiming 70% capacity after 1000 cycles.

I don't know much about 18650, do they generally all have the same minimum voltage (since they get damaged if you discharge them past that)?

Also I'm not sure whether to include the charging circuitry since people might start using different cells with different charging currents and max voltages. Do 18650s have some charging pattern that works for all of them without risk of degradation or explosion?

Why are you guys talking about batteries?

>>239
They're not, they're talking about rechargeable cells.