>>7
He is German. 100% Aryan. His parents operated a private concentration camp.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-01 13:18
Size of OS doesn't matter, Linux is written in C, which has "unsafe, undefined behavior" by default.
The larger a C program is, the probability of "unsafe, undefined behavior" increases.
If there was a type-safe, non-GC C-alternative which had the speed of C, Linux could be rewritten.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-01 13:22
>>9 which had the speed of C
le speed is made be le language XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-01 13:27
>>10
Users and programmers care about performance and memory.
You can write a slow toy OS for yourself though. No one stopping you.
>>1 roopeshvaddepally 3 years ago
irony: minix 3 creater using windows
He can't even start an IRC session to prove there's a **lot** of people working on MIMIX 3.
My personal opinion, is poor documentation, and poor QA testing. If you look at the FreeBSD source code, you will not see that, it will be readable, and comprehensible. And there is more than source of documentation that describe a particular section that you are looking at, that it is hard to get lost.
>>14
Ι'd јuѕt lіkе tο іntеrјесt fοr а mοmеnt. Wһаt уοu'rе rеfеrrіng tο аѕ Windows XP, іѕ іn fасt, Windows XP/Minix, οr аѕ Ι'vе rесеntlу tаkеn tο саllіng іt, Windows XP рluѕ Minix.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-01 13:43
>>14
Let me explain.
Imagine T.Davis was bit more sane and spend his time on improving his OS instead of posting on forums.
Now imagine T.Davis got some support. You still have a toy OS but "its something" between a full-fledged OS and pet project. Thats the stage of Minix. He has to use winXP because Minix isn't capable of much. Its programs are ancient. It has no recent drivers.
MUH LEEES
MUH /G/ENTOO
MUH LE INTERCEPTION XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
MY FACE WHEN LE INSTALLING LE /G/ENTOO INTERCEPTION SOFTWARE
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
LE /G/ROSKI /G/ CULTURE OF LEEEEELS AND JEW/LINUX X-DDDDDD
OH GOD DAT LAUGH XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-01 15:40
>>20
I LEL'D, FELLOW /G/RO? WHAT'S YOUR LE FAVORITE MEME? MINE IS LE STALLMAN FACE
>LE 2013
>IMPLYIN/G/ I DON'T KNOW LE MEMES
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLL LELELELELELEEL
Tanenbaum is one of those deluded academics who has gotten out of touch with reality, severely. Most users do NOT care about (nor want!) absolute reliability or security (the latter leading to "trusted" computing and that DRM shit).
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-02 4:49
>>26 deluded academic
got European Union grant to develop practical OS
>>38
If there is no infinity, what is the largest number?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-02 6:17
>>42
You won't get me with your Jewish trick questions, Jeremiah!
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-02 6:21
check my jewish dubs
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-02 6:27
>>43
using "Jewish" logic: non-existence of "the largest number" implies that the number line extends without bound. What is infinity? A boundless quantity:thus the number line is infinite and "jewish".
Since computers can use such "Jewish" concept as infinite loops and floating point numbers(which contains two "jewish" infinities: the negative and the positive), why are you using such a device Nikita?
>>46
Cudder, why you listen to such mindless bullshit? Is it because your work is mind-numbing you want to listen to "Dumb damb duuumb" repeated 1000 times?
>>55
Are there people on here who don't actually know about tetracyts? fag scum everywhere.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-02 15:01
The user is a dumb deluded fucktard that shouldn't be using computers in the first place. In all seriousness I take companies more seriously than them.
I really don't like the thought of a high-technology dependent future or society anyways.