/prog/ - NIKITA — World4ch

Name: Mr. Gold 2013-07-26 0:45

vk.com/id56093567

vk.com/id3190276

http://plus.google.com/116715566862586549760/posts

http://stackoverflow.com/users/2113349/nikita-sadkov

vk.com/id190743761

stackoverflow.com/users/2031431/nikita-sadkov

must find more and figure out if it is him or not
need more info

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 0:47

www.vk.com/id169900107
nikita seems to like oversized roiding blonde blue eye men such as cena wrestler

https://vk.com/wall-36775802_8238017?reply=8238702

www.vk.com/id156808964

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:34

Stop PRing yourself, Goldman.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:50

forum sliding detecteed

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 4:57

These aint my accounts and have nothing to do with me.

My only account is http://vk.com/antisemitic

I also had accounts at a few video-game forums, before they got banned: http://allost.gorod33.ru/index.php?showuser=3761 and http://www.old-games.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=55231&page=3

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 5:32

>>5
IIRC, at old-games.ru I got a ban for calling person named "Kagansky" a kike, because he shown strong anti-Lisp sentiments.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:23

>>6
Well, he was right. Lishp is a worthless outdated pile of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:39

>>7
Shalom, Hymie!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:24

>>8
Kill yourself already.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:27

>>7
all modern programming languages are hideous and even more hideous to use

hideous to both the abstract lisp programmer or the autistic calculating C programmer

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:29

>>5
Ha ha! Baldy!/ Where's your hair, baldy? Ha ha!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

>>11
hair is for monkey.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

>>11
SHALOM, KIKE! Better have a bald head than a hook nose!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:37

>>13
Whatever you say, Baldy.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:43

>>10
No, all programming languages are hideous and even more hideous to use.
But there are two shining hopes on the horizon: the ever-evolving and morphing Haskell, and the freshly built, practical and intelligent Rust.
Little as the glimmer of hope is, we might yet live to glimpse a good programming language. Lisp, however, is not a light but a failed, ugly turd of the past.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:45

If Nikita wants to talk about antisemitic videogames, he should join genmay!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:56

I still don't understand what goes in Nikita's head to make an account called antisemitic public.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:05

>>17
That is a descriptive name.

Nikita is antisemitic, just like Lisp is a list processing.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:06

>>6
Well, guess what, kikes made Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:17

>>18
Nikita and Lisp have one thing in common: nobody gives a shit about them in the real world, but /prog/ is full of them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:32

>>19
Alonzo Church was a kike?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:46

>>21
McCarthy was a kike.
Lugovsky is a kike.
Lisp is permeated by kikes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:53

>>22
Lugowski is a Haskell and static typing advocate. He has nothing to do with Lisp.

John McCarthy was born in Boston on September 4, 1927 to an Irish immigrant father and a Lithuanian Jewish immigrant mother
Wasn't it Steve Russel, who did the implementation after exposure to Church's Lambda Calculus, while Timothy Hart invented macros? McCarthy just appropriated their work. It's typical for jewish professors to steal inventions of their students. And then McCarthy went to create Algol, because he regarded Lisp as "a disadvantage".

One can even conjecture that Lisp owes its survival specifically to the fact that its programs are lists, which everyone, including me, has regarded as a disadvantage. -- John McCarthy, "Early History of Lisp"

McCarthy once admitted his failure to grasp the Church's work: "I didn't understand the rest of his book" (http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp/node2.html)

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:03

>>23
Okay then. SICP is kikes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:06

>>24
That is why you read your HtDP instead.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:24

>>23
No, Lugovskij is a Lisp advocate.
Теперь понятно, почему нормальные люди "быдлокодят" на Жабе, а на ЛИСПЕ сублимируют, подсчитывая скобочки, такие гении, как Луговский.
http://www.linux.org.ru/gallery/screenshots/929468

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:25

Lugovskij sounds like "fujoshi".

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:38

>>26
May be Lugowski is an ethnic Pole? Google search gives only one Jew with such surname:
http://faculty.mville.edu/lugowskid/

all other appears to be authentic catholic Poles.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:48

>>26
No. The Jew advocated Haskell, MetaOCaml and Forth - three completely useless academic language. And while Haskell could have some value, Forth has none of it, unless you want reverse-polish calculator. Lugowsky is a crazy kike. Lisp would be much better without him.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 16:04

>>29

Bullshit, because you don't understand, doesn't mean it has no value. Stack based programming can be very convenient, especially because most statements can be concatenated. It is syntax low. They form the schemes and the lisps of the imperative world.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 17:27

the industry losers are just mad because the academics get to have all the fun with superior programming languages while their bosses wont let them use them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:24

>>31
the industry losers are just sad because the academics get to die while they desperatly try to find a Haskell job and fail to do so, while their bosses eat ginger curry baked in a delicious purple oven WITH CHEESE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:31

>>32
dumb capitalist pig
you lose in the end, code monkey

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 21:37

http://vk.com/antisemitic - real VK

Name: toplel 2013-07-26 22:17

kek

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 0:36

>>30
It is syntax low.
That doesn't make concatenatentive crap useful. Stack is inefficient and incomprehensible.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:47

>>36
concatenatentive

Makes you feel smart, doesn’t it?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:49

>>37
Sorry, I meant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concatenative_programming_language

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:39

>>36

Stack based programming is not incomprehensible, if you break your program in smaller parts. Little syntax makes the mental model of the language easier. Concatenative only means they language forms a monoid. This means we a identity program and an operation which adds two programs together. Every little program can be tested or even proved to work in a certain way. From this you need to build the bigger program. The stack manipulation is not more difficult than point free programming. You need a set of operators, which work the stack. If you have a good collection it is possible to write clear code.

It are programming languages with a very trivial structure. It makes reasoning about your code easier. Like scheme does. It makes the implementation on new platforms easy, like scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:42

>>37
Smarter than you, ``concatenacatenative''.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 6:25

>>39
Every little program can be tested or even proved to work in a certain way.
snake oil.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:19

>>41

That is what unit testing is, proving is a different matter.

For "side effect"-affected -to concatenate two expressions- functions this is of course not always possible, but due to the simplicity of these languages it is still possible to describe them. It is somewhat more work than their pure functions.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:30

>>40
Smarter than you
You wish, brain dead mongrel.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:34

>>43
Shalom, kike!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:47

>>44
russian

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:49

>>45
Nikita isn't Kafir. He is Chechen. He wants to behead Russians.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 8:02

>>46

It is a mudslime? Ahahaha, hahahahahaha, that's funny. He is a cultural inferior goat lover. Hahaha.

NIKITA

1 Name: Mr. Gold 2013-07-26 0:45

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 0:47

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:34

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:50

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 4:57

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 5:32

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:23

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:39

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:24

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:27

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:29

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:37

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:43

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:56

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:05

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:06

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:17

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:32

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:46

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:53

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:03

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:06

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:24

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:25

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:38

29 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:48

30 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 16:04

31 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 17:27

32 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:24

33 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:31

34 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 21:37

35 Name: toplel 2013-07-26 22:17

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 0:36

37 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:47

38 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:49

39 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:39

40 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:42

41 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 6:25

42 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:19

43 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:30

44 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:34

45 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:47

46 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:49

47 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 8:02

Name: Mr. Gold 2013-07-26 0:45

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 0:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 2:50

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 4:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 5:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:23

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 6:39

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:27

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:35

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:37

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:43

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:45

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 7:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:05

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:06

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:17

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:46

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 8:53

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:03

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:06

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:25

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 9:48

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 16:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 17:27

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 20:31

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-26 21:37

Name: toplel 2013-07-26 22:17

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 0:36

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 1:49

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:39

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 6:25

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:19

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:30

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:47

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 7:49

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 8:02