Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

NIKITA

Name: Mr. Gold 2013-07-26 0:45

vk.com/id56093567

 vk.com/id3190276 

http://plus.google.com/116715566862586549760/posts

http://stackoverflow.com/users/2113349/nikita-sadkov  

vk.com/id190743761  

stackoverflow.com/users/2031431/nikita-sadkov

must find more and figure out if it is him or not
need more info

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-27 5:39

>>36

Stack based programming is not incomprehensible, if you break your program in smaller parts. Little syntax makes the mental model of the language easier. Concatenative only means they language forms a monoid. This means we a identity program and an operation which adds two programs together.  Every little program can be tested or even proved to work in a certain way. From this you need to build the bigger program. The stack manipulation is not more difficult than point free programming. You need a set of operators, which work the stack. If you have a good collection it is possible to write clear code.

It are programming languages with a very trivial structure. It makes reasoning about your code easier. Like scheme does. It makes the implementation on new platforms easy, like scheme.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List