>>7
Well, he's new. I know someone who came some years ago, dug up some threads, learned some ``memes'' and is still fucking spewing them just because.
At times it feels kind of like a dilemma.
Do companies really want programmers who know the magic of Lisp ?
No.
They want JAVA PHP SQL ASP .NET AGILE DESIGN PATTERNS.
It's all about the latest fashionable bullshit trend.
Cloud computing.
That's business with .NET.
I suppose universities want to make people better prepared for "industrial" programming.
>>11
Just look around, there are some /g/ posts, some ``JEWS'' posts with badly formed BBCode, that thread with the ``Check this *grabs dick*'' and many others.
Name:
122013-07-03 20:03
>>13
I think I read that recently. I've been watching my SICP this summer. In the fall I will go to a Java school. I hope I'm not doomed to suffering. Maybe I should try to make it into academia (fortunately I don't live in the US so university won't cost 100,000$). I guess I could also try to get into a "good" company that does more than bullshit (intel or google or whatever)
>>5
>SICP for mental midgets >>20 >>21
LLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>EGIN LE SAGE
>EGIN GWIGNGGWINN!! XDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-03 23:17
Call a program ``elegant'' if no smaller program has the same output. I.e., a LISP S-expression is defined to be elegant if no smaller S-expression has the same value. For any computational task there is at least one elegant program, perhaps more. Nevertheless, we present a Berry paradox proof that it is impossible to prove that any particular large program is elegant. The proof is carried out using a version of LISP designed especially for this purpose. This establishes an extremely concrete and fundamental limitation on the power of formal mathematical reasoning.
Name:
Berry2013-07-03 23:59
Hey! I'm not a paradox or a proof! I'm just Berry L. Guggenheimer, the Human Being.