Documentation? We don't need no stinkin' documentation. Read the fucking code, faggot.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 0:14
Fuck you. If I have to read your shitty code to use your shitty library, I'll just write my own shitty library instead. But if you have some shitty documentation, I might use your shit.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 0:24
>>2
Lazy idiot. I hope you enjoy having backdoors in everything you link against.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 0:51
>>3 You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code. - Ken Thompson
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 1:02
>>4
A community of software enthusiast programmers will share the burden of auditing source code. Issues about malicious features will become news and will not be hidden for long.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 1:05
>>5 community of software enthusiast programmers
that sounds like a euphemism for permanently-virgin faggots
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 1:18
>>6
Is a virgin faggot better or worse than a slutty faggot in your system?
>>11
Are my dubs more or less impressive than you're smartness?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 3:22
Documentation is for faggots, as are standards. Real programmers don't need to be told what to do, they just fucking do it, and that's that.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-30 3:42
Thinking is for faggots, as are formal proofs. Real programmers don't need to understand what they do, they just fucking write something random, tinker with it for a few weeks until it starts to look ok, put it in production code and wait for it's broken logical foundations to expose themselves in the field, and that's that.