Why Python sucks

f=lambda y:''.join(['\n'.join(['X' if abs(y[j]-1.0*i*(max(y)-min(y))/len(y))<0.5*(max(y)-min(y))/len(y) else ' ' for j in xrange(len(y)+1)]) for i in xrange(len(y))])

And that my f^riends is why you stick with Haskell.

I thought it had something to do with the code, and how you're forced to indent it. I suppose that wraps up this thread.

   _____ __          __                __
  / ___// /_  ____ _/ /___  ____ ___  / /
  \__ \/ __ \/ __ `/ / __ \/ __ `__ \/ /
 ___/ / / / / /_/ / / /_/ / / / / / /_/ 
/____/_/ /_/\__,_/_/\____/_/ /_/ /_(_)


HASKAL :: Dog -> Dog
HASKAL = dead

"Haskell isn't used for anything" - creator of Haskell

Static typing.

7 million get

>>5
"Haskell isn't useful" - spj

And you got the context wrong, he was refering to the evolution of languages that normally start all powerful and useful and then they start adding safety measures, but they aren't enough (which is a whole problem on today's multicore world)

In case haskell started with a solid fundation and safety but no much performance, it's more it didn't have a sane IO mechanism until 96' and wasn't performant enought until 2000 (type class wasn't that trivial back then)

>>5
Haskell would have been useful, if only it had Lisp syntax.

>>9
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((anus))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))