Adria Richards

I hear she is a fucking slut filthy jewess who loves nigger cocks.

>>40
e.g. givin' birth

>>38
Misandry don't real. Those angsty misandrists only exist in the imagination of misogynist shitheads.

>>39
Leah Culver is hot. Leah Culver is fun. She's like a good friend. She takes cock jokes the same way she takes cock: with a smile.

Adria Richards is a slut and a filthy jewess. She will try to emasculate you if you're white. If you're a nigger she will suck your dick, no question asked.

tl;dr Adria Richards is a fucking slut filthy jewess who loves nigger cocks.

dubs

But... I just looked at her picture. She's a fucking NIGGER! Nigger kikes everywhere!

#adriarichards #nigger #kike #YOLO

venturebeat.com/2013/03/20/playhaven-developer-fired-for-making-sexual-jokes-after-sendgrids-developer-evangelist-outs-him-on-twitter/


WHITE MALE WEB DEVELOPPER PRIVLEGE STATUS: CHECKED

>>43,45
You seem upset, are you bothered?

While I did make a big dongle joke about a fictional piece hardware that identified as male, no sexual jokes were made about forking. My friends and I had decided forking someone’s repo is a new form of flattery (the highest form being implementation) and we were excited about one of the presenters projects; a friend said “I would fork that guys repo.” The sexual context was applied by Adria, and not us.

He added that, in his opinion, this was not a fair fight. And that as a result of Richard’s tweet, he — a father of three — was fired from his job:

My second comment is this, Adria has an audience and is a successful person of the media. Just check out her web page linked in her twitter account, her hard work and social activism speaks for itself. With that great power and reach comes responsibility. As a result of the picture she took I was let go from my job today. Which sucks because I have 3 kids and I really liked that job.

She gave me no warning, she smiled while she snapped the pic and sealed my fate.

>>46
that is what you get for say "shalom, hymie" and hoping they wont get your IP.

>>25
No, I don't find that's particularly worse. You can still call out those ``small scale events'' for the shit they are. Just because they have fallen out the *ism category doesn't grant them moral status, as much as some *ists halfheartedly argue that they aren't as important.

This, on the other hand, goes the full way backwards. It's an enormous regression on their part.

Adria's knowledge... according to her Linkedin profile

Social Media
Web Development
PHP
CSS
JavaScript
VMware
Product Development

I don't have anything against female programmers, i had only good experiences with them (clean code, reaching milestones in time, etc...), but damn, this girl is fucking useless.

(continued...)

Every programmer i know (girls included), even if they knew PHP as their main language, at least were capable of compiling and doing C programs, or Perl, or other enterprise language, or be able to create SQL procedures, etc etc. But when your technical knowledge limits to PHP and Javascript and you call yourself an "evangelist", you're shit.

>>51,52
Adria is not only a woman, she's a nigger. What did you expect?

>>51
I don't have anything against female programmers
She isn't your typical female. She is Jewish, which carries along a lot of politics.

this girl is fucking useless.
Yet she can fire you by a whim.

>>54
twitter says everything:
https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/313417655879102464
Adria Richards: I hate these goyim, I hate their jokes
Noah Kantrowitz: please talk to us up in the staff office. Room 211

See? It is one big Jewish family. One kike dislikes you, and whole Jews community will help him to put you down.

>>53
>>54
nigger or kike?

>>55
Nigger kike then, definitely. How can I contact her and call her a nigger kike?

*nigger kike slut.

>>56
Niggers don't do "social activism" and don't have over 9000 Jewish friends. So...

>>50
You can still call out those ``small scale events'' for the shit they are.
No, you can't. The definition doesn't apply. Are you even a programmer? Fuck. The original definition (as well as what most people think is the definition nowadays) is discrimination by sex or by gender. Calling a large scale phenomenon "sexism" is already an abuse of notation and should be done cautiously (since such a large scale phenomenon could be caused by correlations and factors unrelated to sexism).

Now let's go back to this lingo that people who hate racism, sexism and white males have developed. Saying that *isms only go one way and not being gender- and race-blind in your judgement of a situation are excellent ways to alienate a shitload of people and turn them against you. And they're right to do so since you are discriminating against them. If a female does something terribly sexist to a male, it is exactly (no more, no less) as bad as a male doing something terribly sexist to a female. Claiming otherwise yields inequality, which is what you set out to fight in the first place.

One last thought: ironically, the "new" definitions of sexism and racism are, respectively, sexist and racist. Heh.

>>42
Search tumblr or twitter for posts by females who claim to dislike or outright hate white people, and in particular white males. If that's not racist and sexist (and since it is sexism against males, misandrist), then I don't know what is.

>>60
You're attacking a straw man. In practice a misandrist female has less offsprings, meaning less misandrists, so the evolution kills misandrist itself.

Although, there was a proposition to support feminism as a mean of population control, but it just wont work in the long run.

http://prospect.org/article/holdrens-controversial-population-control-past
Holdren and the Ehrlichs were writing during a time of national, bipartisan panic about overpopulation. Such panic led to real human-rights abuses, spurring an international feminist campaign to replace the idea of population control with a focus on women's health and rights.

I.e. more hardcore population control campaign was replaced with feminist oriented.

But it wont work, because evolution kills feminists.

>>61
Then again, society with ongoing gender struggle would be weaker than, for example, Muslim society, so Muslims can easily behead you.

>>62
Yannick vs Ahmed.

LLLELLLLL
>ADRIA RICHARDS' BLOG IS DOWN

>>64
No

>>36
Is there necessarily a problem with proving them right? Otherwise, you're just proving their suspicions right that you let them walk all over you.

>>66
I have absolutely no problem with people ``walking all over'' shithead Redditors who think harassment is a human right (but only when they do it).

>>67
Are you the guy who jizz in his graphic cards?

>>67
Do you consider the inclusion of a dick joke in a conversation to be harassment against someone unrelated and not participating in the conversation?

>>69
B-B-BUT MUH FEELINGS
I CANT UDDERSTAYN WHUT DIS GAI IZ TAWKIN BOOT SO IMMA JUST LIZZEN 2 DESE GAIZ WHO ARE HAVING A PRIVATE CONVERSATION BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE AND NOT GIVING THE PRESENTATION ON STAGE BECAUSE WHY WOULD YOU PAY ATTENTION TO THAT WHEN YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL ABOUT IT AND NEVER WILL BECAUSE YOU'RE A FUCKING RETARDED CHILD AND NOT AN ADULT AS SHOWN BY YOUR LACK OF ATTENTION SPAN AND MATURITY MEBBE I LERN SUMTINK ER IMPROVE MUH DEVELOPURR RELAYSHUNS...

O SHIT

O SHIT O SHIT O SHIT
...dey tawkin bout peenizzez

ITZ UN OPPOORTOONTITTY 2 SMASH DA PATRIOTOCRACY!

>>66
Check your dubs, white man.

>>1-71,73-
Kronar and all the men of his tribe are strictly homosexual. However, they do not appear to have any concept of the word "homosexual" in the modern sense: they copulate with other men solely to keep their tribe free from woman's taint.

>>69-70
Loudly making misogynist ``jokes'' in the direction of the woman you're sitting behind doesn't constitute a private conversation.

>>73
Hi Adria Richards!

>>71-

>>73
You are fucking retarded.

>>73
It also never happened. Back to trolling now.

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2013/03/21/standing-with-adria/
Crude, sexist jokes are part of tech culture, and a lot of companies are run by young white guys who don’t seem to understand appropriate workplace behavior.
There is no objectively ``appropriate'' workplace behavior. What is considered to be ``appropriate workplace behaviour'' is determined by predominant social convention and morality. In techie environments, social convention (by rule of overwhelming majority) dictates that crude jokes are appropriate. The mistake is that the employers didn't specify the exact workplace atmosphere and environment in the contract terms, and tell you to take your business elsewhere if you can't handle dick jokes (because, frankly, if you can't take a dick joke, you won't make it through the pain and frustration software development inevitably incurs).

and tell you to take your business elsewhere if you can't handle dicks (because, frankly, if you can't take a dick, you won't make it through the pain and frustration software development inevitably incurs).

>>78
This was a programmer's convention. It's assumed that the appropriate behaviour is political correctness. Even if it was in the workplace, any joke regarding sexuality or gender are just plain rude.