no exceptionfaultI AM THE MOST FUCKINGExpertENTERPRISE BRAINFUCK ENGINEER and COMPUTER SCIENCEis all about abstract brainfuck that you will never understand.
>>9
Well, she's a local celebrity, but she isn't disruptive, pots only occasionally, and doesn't draw attention to herself save for having a trip, and from what I recall, often makes actual contributions. Most tripfags make the boards their personal blogs, like the l337 UK kid or whatever his trip was.
>>10
Cudder is a fucking Intel evangelist and /prog/ is his advertisement blog. He may as well be a bot: I.e. create an ARM or PPC thread - Cudder will quickly react with some canned Intel marketing copipe.
>>13
Cudderberg probably works for Intel. Bring up the x87 stack or any of the thousands of kludges in x86 and he'll blame the programmer or compiler. It's funny that Intel uses the same justification for x86 and Itanium. For x86, they say the kludges are for backwards compatibility with OSes that will probably only run on the machine in an emulator, if ever. For Itanium, they say the kludges are to reveal the low-level parts of the chip for explicit scheduling. For both, they make incredibly ugly instruction sets and put the burden on the compiler writers, and then years later need tons of kludges in the CPU to keep it fast. It's a double burden. Imagine if compilers had access to the ~100 registers inside the chip and could use any of them for division and string transfer. It's like making a diamond and covering it with x86 shit.