>>20
yes, i understand that they were created by jews but, how is javascript a control tool?
i know media is, and abrahamic religions too, but javascript?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-26 22:26
>>23
Yes. By tricking goyim into developing for Jewish controlled platforms such as web browser, they're effectively controlling them and making the goyim control easier for the Jews, since social media and all the start-up matter is made mostly by goyim in order to control goyim.
Also, making the goyim latch to a programing language with terribly designed constructs and an anal-prolapsed type system is something that has been done by Jews before. Namely, PHP.
Al-Comrad Nikita will be proud to post the list of Jews in computer science in order to prove their role in the control of the Jews using means other than the direct control of media.
I think javascript is an ok tool. It could be worse... just imagine all those scripts written in VBA... yuck
Even so, my /prog/ clone will have no javascript at all. I'll be waiting until browsers share a decent VM where you can choose any language to develop in.
It sucks that using Websockets still requires you to use javascript to open the connection. A special tag would have sufficed
>>30
ECMAScript is not an OK Tool. Guile, awk, and NekoVM are better script interpreters than V8. People still use broken ActionsScript and JavaVM on machines to run propriety applications since they are forced to. Do your best to force them to use better tools. My clients _sites_ are all in gopher, they do not suspect anything, since browsers run gopher just fine.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-27 8:27
>>31
Is not that bad, look at all the fantastic tech built over javascript. The worse of all is the tyranny of javascript, though. We should have choices. Real choices, not just translators from X to javascript. And i'm not even talking about an option like Dart, but a real general purpose Virtual Machine specification for all browsers to agree upon.
That gopher thing sounds interesting. Can you give a link for examples of the tech you mentioned?
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-27 8:29
>>32 look at all the fantastic tech built over javascript.
Businesses managed to make money using COBOL. That doesn't make it a good language.
>>30 I think javascript is an ok tool. It could be worse... just imagine all those scripts written in VBA... yuck
Much better than Javashit. Really.
>>32 Is not that bad, look at all the fantastic tech built over javascript.
Niggers and Jews are not that bad, look at all the amazing stuff they have worked on.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-27 10:19
>>35
LLLLLLEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>OMG SO KAWAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII XDDD ^^
>>35
it was meant to be a cute joke. Even still it is a better alternative than spidermonkey, V8, or hell trident. Opera does it right, even if they know it is a pile of shit.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 7:38
Proposed in 1931, the Zermelo's navigation problem is a classic optimal control problem. The problems deals with a boat navigating on a body of water, originating from a point O to a destination point D. The boat is capable of a certain maximum speed, and we want to derive the best possible control to reach D in the least possible time.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 8:23
(κ·μ)ν = κν·μν.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 9:08
One such fractal curve with an infinite perimeter and finite surface area is the Koch snowflake.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 9:54
A set is pure if all of its members are sets, all members of its members are sets, and so on. For example, the set {{}} containing only the empty set is a nonempty pure set.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 10:39
The precise definition of "class" depends on foundational context. In work on Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the notion of class is informal, whereas other set theories, such as Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory, axiomatize the notion of "proper class", e.g., as entities that are not members of another entity.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 11:24
Every such subset has a smallest element, so to specify our choice function we can simply say that it maps each set to the least element of that set. This gives us a definite choice of an element from each set, and makes it unnecessary to apply the axiom of choice.