Haskell Developers

These people brought us Haskell:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vitorrodrigues/203668055/sizes/l/in/photostream/

find a single goy (non-Jew).

>>39

Yes, you summarize the faults we made, but don't understand it isn't simply changed, because you walk over the opinion of -what you call- fuckwads. We have lots of them, completely detached from reality by WW2. It is a pitiful state.

We made gestures in the past. They are there even if you want to close your eyes for it. We will make gestures of good faith in the future, but Iran keeps fueling the radicals, keeping the circle closed. Thus preventing it from breaking.

It's not a simple question of good faith alone anymore. Hamas for example is an organization, which has in his statutes the destruction of all Jews.

The youth are aware of these problems. Especially who live on the other side of the country. They inherited these problems and they are softening. I think it takes some time and some understanding on both sides, that it cannot go on.


Killing all the palestinians?

Yes, that could be an outcome. It is the short path, fueled by hatred. I was cynical, which is often dangerously close to realistic. But only close, I am more interested in a different perspective.

Anyway, it was an interesting discussion. I have to go. I hope you will fare well, that is something you people say, yes?

>>41
Yes, you summarize the faults we made, but don't understand it isn't simply changed, because you walk over the opinion of -what you call- fuckwads. We have lots of them, completely detached from reality by WW2. It is a pitiful state.
The country was created as a consequence of WW2.  And it was an unnecessarily violent creation, since jews and palestinians were living together just fine before then, and there was no reason to forcibly displace the palestinians.  I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just saying that it's to be expected that a lot of those founders to be, well, not necessarily nice and understanding people.

We made gestures in the past. They are there even if you want to close your eyes for it. We will make gestures of good faith in the future, but Iran keeps fueling the radicals, keeping the circle closed. Thus preventing it from breaking.
Yes, and you have to keep trying.  Violence and fuckwadedness must not prevail.

It's not a simple question of good faith alone anymore. Hamas for example is an organization, which has in his statutes the destruction of all Jews.
Of course.  But the Hamas will disappear if they stop having support by the people around them, and such support will stop if those people understand that you really do want peace.  However you can understand how they might perceive you as backstabbers if you say you want peace and still illegally colonize palestinian territory and erect barriers.

>>39


 You could start by putting an end to the illegal colonization as described above, then by showing the palestinians (and whoever else is watching) some acts of good faith, e.g. by building them water pumps and by sending over food if they need it, maybe helping them with agriculture and giving them your old cars.  Provide books if they want them.  You might think it's way too expensive, but I believe that paying the military to be constantly on the watch for imminent attacks is a lot more expensive.  And with all that, you can hope that someday that big wall will be unnecessary.
Would they accept it? If they did, would it be like aid to Africa and NK where the leaders take it all while the people still starve? How would you prevent it from being like the US `rebuilding' attempts where various factions see those who accept help as collaborators and attack them? Also consider that one of the easiest ways to stay in power as a despot is to had a perpetual enemy. There are some on both sides that have a lot to lose by achieving peace.

>>42
It was an interesting discussion indeed, may your enlightenment spread.

>>44
Would they accept it?
When you're starving, you accept it.

If they did, would it be like aid to Africa and NK where the leaders take it all while the people still starve?
The israeli have enough military and organizational skills to take care of the distribution as well.

How would you prevent it from being like the US `rebuilding' attempts where various factions see those who accept help as collaborators and attack them?
If they fear for their safety, I suppose you can station some guards at their request.  I doubt palestinians are in the mood for kill each other.

Also consider that one of the easiest ways to stay in power as a despot is to had a perpetual enemy. There are some on both sides that have a lot to lose by achieving peace.
That is indeed the biggest problem.  Peace is not wanted by the leaders of either side (as well as the military-industrial complex, etc.), which makes things, well, very difficult.

>>46
I don't think it's as simply as you thing it is.
When you're starving, you accept it.
Don't dismiss the power of ideology so easily, especially when it is religious. And Israel hasn't put forth too much sincere effort to foster good will (and really seems to be doing it's damnedest to make themselves look like monsters to the entire world), and there is really no reason to trust them.

The israeli have enough military and organizational skills to take care of the distribution as well.
This would likely require removing the current power structures or a mutually agreeable compromise. The first would mean more violence, which we can agree is bad, and the last seems to be unforthcoming. _{^{I don't mean to present a false dichotomy here; if you see other options, please say so.}} Either way, this sounds like a pretty lengthy occupation, and even a small group that doesn't like it and is willing to use violence can be very disruptive. A few dozen soldiers killed by a bomb while passing out bread is enough to restart a war.

If they fear for their safety, I suppose you can station some guards at their request.  I doubt palestinians are in the mood for kill each other.
Terrorist groups who are out to start\continue a war don't need too much morale to operate, they just need some `persuasive' recruitment tactics. ("Join us or we'll kill your family" type of tactics.) They kill some Israelis and drag the battle into a daycare center so a bunch of kids get killed and everything is back how it is now.

Don't remember Euclid needing your category theory..

>>46
When you're starving, you accept it.
Dude, what the hell, Palestine is nowhere near close to starving, in fact it has one of the longest projected life expectancy among Arab countries. I suggest you stop getting your information from /pol/, especially when it's not actual information but soundbites about literally-holocaust, and go watch some news reports showing actual Palestinian life for starters.

The israeli have enough military and organizational skills to take care of the distribution as well.
So like it was from 1967 to 2005?

If they fear for their safety, I suppose you can station some guards at their request.  I doubt palestinians are in the mood for kill each other.
*facepalm*

*grabs dick*

>>49
Dude, what the hell, Palestine is nowhere near close to starving, in fact it has one of the longest projected life expectancy among Arab countries.
I'm not talking about most of it, I'm talking about the regions that are getting screwed by the wall.  Sometimes it's just an annoyance, and sometimes it blocks off the access to resources.

I suggest you stop getting your information from /pol/,
I, um, don't even go there.

So like it was from 1967 to 2005?
What is particular about those dates?  I am not particularly familiar with Israel history.

*facepalm*
Okay, what did I say?

>>40
Not sacred enough for you?
You did, you shitskinned raghead. Jerusalem is very sacred for the JEWS.

>>52
Sorry, I don't talk to cattle. Go to work, dumb goy.

>>53
O-okay, JEW-sama!

>>51
I'm not talking about most of it, I'm talking about the regions that are getting screwed by the wall.  Sometimes it's just an annoyance, and sometimes it blocks off the access to resources.
It doesn't do that. It's there to make sure that Palestinians who want to work in Israel can do that, while Palestinians who want to come wrapped in explosives and kill some Jews, can't.

I suggest you stop getting your information from /pol/,
I, um, don't even go there.
From where have you got this silly image of Palestine as a starving state or something, then? I tell you: stop getting your information from there, go find some interviews with Palestinians on youtube and witness the fact that they are doing pretty much OK, nowhere near being starved people that would welcome Israel intervention if only Israeli soldiers stopped sacrificing their babies.

So like it was from 1967 to 2005?
What is particular about those dates?
Well, that's when Israel governed Palestine directly, like you suggested. And "freedom fighters" routinely killed Israelis and "collaborating" Palestinians. That also explains the facepalm, plus the whole idea that Palestinians are averse to killing Palestinians is ridiculous: what do you think they seek to achieve by launching missiles at Israel from the rooftops of hospitals and schools? Are they, like, oh maybe this time they wouldn't strike back, or something?

No, bro, it's simple math: every missile that actually kills some Israelis harms Hamas image and reduces its funding from other Arab nations, every Palestinian killed as a collateral damage harms the image of Israel and increases said funding. And Palestinian terrorists follow this math to the letter.

I am not particularly familiar with Israel history.
I noticed. Neither are you particularly familiar with the current circumstances of Palestine. It's anyone's guess why do you think that your opinions on it have enough weight to be voiced publicly.

>>1-55,57-1000,infinity
Shalom alaykBOOM, Middle East loving scum!

My worst farts smell better than the best smelling kike.

>>56
wow you're such a shlemiel, hymie!

My worst farts smell better than the best smelling shitskin.

>>59
That's because the word shitskin isn't only about the color.

god Jews are so fucking annoying

god Muslims are so fucking annoBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooootktktktkktktkstktk

>>62
you are also annoying, boom-kun

>>63
alilalaliallahsalamaialalakatata!

>>63
typical WASPs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wroj0FLvzs

>>65
it's like they only have two neurons each! speaking of which, check my doubles.