Child Porn appreciation is Legal!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ostD5q878k4

A paedo group is a subgroup closed under masturbation.

Terrible!

>>30
I'm not the one making the argument that pain is the basis for morality. All the cool and mainstream atheists are the ones saying that.

>>40
Actually in many academic circles ``anti-abrahamism/macdonalds/hollywood ideas'' are quite very popular.

2. copyright infringement: there were a few show-off processes, where some nigger got 12 years for sharing 12 mp3 files, but that is all and we all know niggers are petty criminals.
I don't think you know what taboo means.

>>39
(math major pun)
eat fucking shit, redditor shitstain

>>44
nice doubles, scatophage

>>39
no one is stupid enough to sell CP. maybe you though.

4. porn: sex is sill a taboo and unsafe for work. at least not for kids under 18.
5. gore: violence video games are nothing new and whole office enjoys these disemboweling and beheading videos. even 8-years old girls love watching bloody war videos on youtube.

>>39
Well, fuck, performing a cursory search suggests that some of the biggest rings were dedicated to ``swapping'' and ``sharing'' their material, but they didn't specify if for free, even if the words imply it. Either way, I don't want to have ``COOL FREE CHILD PORN'' in my search history. I do seem to recall arrests of married couples producing their stuff for these purposes only, but I don't remember the specifics as to search that.

>>43
Taboo means that sharing some information is prohibited.

I fucking love child porn.

>>50
Seek professional help.

scatophage
i lol'ed, but i don't even ... it's poo-related, right?

I fucking love professional help.

I fucking love fucking kids

I fucking loathe kids.

>>36
If a government's goal were to make it unprofitable for child abusers to produce and sell recordings, they could simply make available all the existing banished recordings for free.
I'm against pedo-alarmism, because it really does harken back to shit like McCarthyism, but this wouldn't work. Not only would this just explode the market share by the virtue of massive availablity, driving up the demand for more production, but a large amount of the shit that's produced is made and distributed freely (but privately) to compete who can make the hottest scene or whatnot in their little group. All of the stuff that is made with the intention of selling (which tends toward more sadistic and murderous displays as well) on the other hand is made by the jews.

>>56
Bullshit. How would that be different than now?

>>57
Really? Tremendous increase in ease of access and legality to the public? You don't see how that would just make the demand explode? Have I been trolled?

>>58
Everyone who wants CP can get it already. Demand would not increase. If meth was legalized, would there be a swarm of people out buying meth? No. If you want meth, you can already get it, laws be damned. Same with CP. If you are a nasty sick fuck, then you are already interested. The king's approval would not magically make normal people want to go get trashed on a CP binge.

Everyone who wants CP can get it already.
Not everyone who wants CP is you and has your extensive knowledge of where to find it, for insance I have no clue.

After hearing endlessly about how the onion network is all CP this CP that (with a bit of assassination contracting and drug trafficking on the side) from all these randoms and getting sick of the hype, I go there and I find none of that, every hidden service I tried was down (or hosting nothing but a page with that FBI macro) except for the clearnet quality torchan. After two days of hitting my head against a wall during /prog/'s downtimes I concluded whoever keeps making those claims has either never actually used the onion network, or everone else is some sort of natural divining rod to CP on tor and that's all they can stumble upon, somehow.

>>60
Not everyone who wants CP is you and has your extensive knowledge of where to find it, for insance I have no clue.
Use Google image search.

>>60
of natural divining rod to CP
Kind of like a gaydar?

After hearing endlessly about how the onion network is all CP this CP that (with a bit of assassination contracting and drug trafficking on the side)
People only talk about the bad parts of things.  Also, hundreds of thousands of man-years of mathematics, cryptography and computer science and this is what people use the final product for?  I fucking hate humans.

every hidden service I tried was down
At least freenode and duckduckgo's hidden services work.  Otherwise I also use it for impromptu IRC servers as well as for when I have to remote control some retard's computer because they decided to go root and fuck with the system files and I can't access their computer directly because it's behind two firewalls and a NAT.  Also tormail (or equivalent) is cool if you are disclosing ``sensitive'' information (such as security flaws in horribly-designed products) and don't want to get in trouble with the men in blue.

(or hosting nothing but a page with that FBI macro)
Really?  Why do they bother setting all that up?

If you can't find cp on tor then you don't need to be there.

>>63
Fuck off, pedoshit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hidden_Wiki

The problem with current anonymizing networks is that they don't support any form of voluntary conspiracy attack against peers that break network rules, and they don't support independent networks and cryptographic identities.

>>66
Do you know what an anonymity network is? Do you have a clue as to how they work, civil-rights-chan?

>>67
I know how they work, and I know that nodes can voluntarily conspire to unmask a particular site.

>>68
Then that defeats the purpose. If the NSA can unmask your node, then don't even bother making it.

>>69
Ah, mon cher monsieur, but that's where cryptographic identities and a web-of-trust come in.  By routing your traffic through people you trust (according to your web-of-trust), you can entrust those people with your anonymity.  If you break network rules (by putting up over 9000 GiB of child porn), they will be the ones who will conspire to unmask you (and of course, they must all agree to unmask you at the same time for the attack to succeed).  Some random stranger or a whole fleet of random strangers (i.e. the NSA or law enforcement) can't do shit about it because you don't know or trust them.

Why searching for Haruhi Suzumiya gives notices about Child Porn?
http://minus.com/l52MXA9N1OzLI

Is there a Haruhi cosplay porn with little girls?

>>71
probably because Haruhi character is an underage schoolgirl.

and US law forbids any visual depiction of underage schoolgirls pron...

"child pornography" means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where?
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

>>72
Wait a sec. Point D specifically. If I were to say
Look! This website contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln
Since I described the link in such a manner that conveys the impression that the page contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, that means the Wikipedia page for Abraham Lincoln constitutes child pornography?

The shotgun-activist-retard doesn't give a shit about civil rights. He just want to hide his child porn collection.

>>74
Fuck you cretin.

>>75
french pedophile

>>76
Funny, I actually hate those little snotty fuckers.

>>71
I think IWF does that censoring, so blame the assholes I in Britain.

Not-so-long ago, Googling "4chan" gave related searches including "child pornography". It's true. The otaku crowd just has that effect on people.

>>77
I thought you said you didn't hate anyone, Activist-kun.

>>78
I actually hate everyone, but at least I don't discriminate.

oh and that includes myself, of course.