Someone still uses these programming languages? My university is teaching us these useless primitive languages when they're supposed to teach us what's in the hype right now (Python, Ruby, Android, C#, C++, PHP, Java, D, etc etc). Shit sucks because I can't understand C but can program better languages like PHP.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 1:55
I feel sorry for you. Try to put some heat in it. I've seen you more creative. I'll give you 1/10 if we were in 2007.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 2:01
Thanks anon I felt really sorry for myself. How could I get a job for only knowing C language in my university. I think I need to change schools now.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 2:04
C and LISP
Which university is that?
Nowadays they only teach shit like Java, C++...
Oh wait, you are trolling.
Move on.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 2:07
Anon4 no I'm not. I'm just mad because I'm paying $$$$$$$$$$ and all I get are these languages that I can't even use in the future.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 3:07
>>5
What's the name of your non-existing university in which you are not enrolled, OP?
This isn't a very good troll. I couldn't picture someone saying that in earnest, particularly because of this phrase:
to teach us what's in the hype right now
Nobody uses the word ``hype'' in a positive manner.
Try harder next time.
Also, check 'em.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 8:26
No, but Common Lisp and Scheme are commonly used.
Where? I have never heard about much less seen any actual program written in any lisp (except for Emacs which is elisp and that one game from a decade ago which used a heavily modified proprietary dialect of CL).
I'm making 6 figures programming in Android right now!
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-07 10:09
>>13
On a cursory glance at the popular downloads the only thing that is a real, somewhat useful application (and not a library for executing fibs and facs in parallel) seems to be this:
This is Usenet Legend, an application for producing a searchable archive of an author's comp.lang.lisp history from Ron Garrett's large archive dump.