Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Python is terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 1:31

Why do people use it? I've been learning Ruby at my work and it's infinitely better - no FIOC, half-assed OO implementation, shitty multithreading, no decent CPAN/Gems equivalent. Ruby is so much cleaner and easier to code with. Not to mention, Ruby is faster than Python according to the latest benchmarks: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 1:38

C gcc median score 1.01
Haskell GHC median score 2.46
Lisp SBCL median score 3.43
Racket median score 5.40
...
Ruby median score 53.12
Python median score 53.73
Perl 69.36


``Ruby, infinitely better and faster.''

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 1:38

Back to Hacker News, Shanely.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 1:38

too bad ruby is slow as fuck

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 1:52

>half-assed OO implementation
You serious ?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 2:39

Python is faster than Ruby.
http://attractivechaos.github.com/plb/

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 2:41

Still waiting for you to go back to le reddit, Shanley.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 3:55

asm is faster than jimmies

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 5:04

I don't want to have to check my privilege every time I start up an interpreter.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 5:38

My python has no nose. How does he smell? Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 6:51

>>1
>>2
The bencmark fucks my mind... So, the bigger the number, the slower they are? Or what?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 8:05

>>11
You mean more time passing during execution means the program is slower? I find that very unlikely.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 9:16

Serious post here!

I prefer ruby as a language ,  but ruby sockets are SLOW AS FUCK.

Python is much speedier but I hate it's lack of closures

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 9:46

Neither of those languages are Scheme, >>13. Almost there, though! Have another shot!

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 10:01

no FIOC

It's for your own good.

half-assed OO implementation

wrong

shitty multithreading

wrong, that's a CPython implementation detail, it's different in PyPy, for instance

no decent CPAN/Gems equivalent

PyPI

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 10:05

>>13
Nobody can seriously be this retarded.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closure_(computer_science)#Example

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 10:05

>>13
You should try Golang

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 11:12

Matz's Ruby has a GIL as well (the Global VM Lock). If you're going to fault CPython for shitty multithreading, Ruby should lose points as well.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 13:36

Scripting languages... they're all shit

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 13:43

>>2
You've omitted PHP master race.

PHP median score 39.35
Ruby median score 53.12
Python 3 median score 53.73
Perl median score 69.36

UMAD Pythonistass?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 14:01

tesrt

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 14:07

>>19
Good thing I'm into scat.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 14:12

Being merely better than Perl doesn't cut it anymore. All slow shit languages with crappy culture will go extinct in the mad dash towards power efficiency.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 14:23

Being merely better than Perl
Blasphemy! There is no such thing.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 22:07

One of those benchmarks shows Ruby being slower than the damned-slow C interpreter. :facepalm:

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 22:27

>>25
:facepalm:
Back to Reddit, please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-15 22:43

``Work'' is not a noun!
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -