Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Git a shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 17:18

I'm going back to fossil.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 11:31

Darcs is clearly the master race once we get cheap local branching.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 11:51

>>31
I'm proud of you, >>31-dong

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 14:53

>>5
thanks man
i was goying to try that piece of bloody software, now i'm definitely staying with git.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 17:15

>>28
You should check out Dragonfly. They use git, but it's probably unpopular enough to make up for that.
And it's definitely enterprise-ready:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/
HAMMER is designed for use on storage media greater than 50G.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 18:14

>>5
Complex vs Intuitive
Oh, it's that argument again.

Pile-of-files repository vs Single file repository
I read that as "might be fast" vs "it's certainly either slow or corruption-prone". BTW on a Git repo after packing the bulk of the data is in a single file, plus a rebuildable index.

Uses "rebase" vs Immutable
This is the buggiest argument of them all. I read it as "does what I tell it to do" vs "insufferable piece of shit that forces a certain way of doing things down your throat and heavily penalizes mistakes". That way of thinking reminds me of Subversion.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List