Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Git a shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 17:18

I'm going back to fossil.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 17:39

What's so great about fossil? You fucking nigger kikes keep praising it but I've never heard a good argument against git.

Well, I haven't tried fossil yet.

Name: uriel 2012-12-18 17:53

>>2
It's from Plan 9 and everything in Plan 9 was absolutely amazing which is why everyone uses it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 17:58

>>3
Back to the grave, Haskal!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 18:01

>>2
http://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 18:04

>>5
Finally, a good argument.

Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 18:04

>>3
So it's basically git with only two command line options?

OMG, ``push'' considering harmful! Just mount the remote repo and copy the local one over!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 18:46

>>7
Well, it's more consistent and uses an interface you already know and have tools for. I think that's a great idea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 19:09

>>5
>Integrated Web interface

It's shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 19:25

Git is GNU shit. Fossil is glorious BSD license. Its that simple.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 19:25

>>7
git uses Bourne Shell, Tcl, Perl, which is harmful. And that is at the top. The rest is thing like, you have to get the entire repository, oh wait I changed my username now everything has to change, oh kool it has a bug tracking and wiki tool all in one, and what I must implement political games between distributions of XXX different mods for one simple tool?

More insane is implementing a git distribution than simple SFTP for a work. Security feature, like checksums and logs can be implement easily on the directory the SFTP server relies on.

Just read it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_(software)

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 19:41

>>11
Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Fossil (software in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 19:50

The closing parens was left out, Ahmed

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:42

>>5
GIT: GPL
FOSSIL: BSD
I don't care about Fossil's other ``advantages'', this is a deal-breaker. I'm sticking with Git because I actually value my freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:47

>>14
Why would you stick with proprietary-licensed software if you value your freedom?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:48

>>14
Shiichan is proprietary, might as well fuck off and stop being a ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:49

I'm working on a version control system written in js. Already it blows git out of the water with far less LOC—this just shows you the power of js.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:56

>>17
Epic as fuck, /b/ro. Post it on le reddit!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 21:00

>>14
Policy over technical advantage. How imbecilic can you get?
>>16
So is math, according to Apple Inc. You might as well pray to your Masters and keep sucking cook.
>>17
Waiting to see it.

IHBST

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 21:08

Waiting to see it.
Unfortunately, that won't happen because the anti-Semitic FFP /g/-spammer is about to bury this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 21:27

I'm going back to fossil
previously switched from fossil to git


Why hello there, ZED SHAW!

Name: Zed 2012-12-18 21:51

My mongrel has no nose, how does he smell?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 22:37

>>22

The Hard Way?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 23:17

lel XD

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 4:09

>LEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>LE TERRIBLE JOKE
>EGIB GRO

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 4:43

cvs is shit, I hate this newfangled crap.  Going back to rcs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 6:18

>>26
What do you say about those crazy experimental cutting-edge folks at freeBSD using svn?

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 7:53

>>27
Oh gawd, don't make me cry. FreeBSD was awesome back in the days. It is the new Linux kids hh4k3r generation that is causing this.

I think I just moved to OpenBSD because of it. Plan 9 when it is enterprise ready

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 8:23

>>28
You're overreacting man. Come on. Or maybe I am the only one who prefers svn over cvs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 11:02

>>29
perforce master race

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 11:31

Darcs is clearly the master race once we get cheap local branching.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 11:51

>>31
I'm proud of you, >>31-dong

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 14:53

>>5
thanks man
i was goying to try that piece of bloody software, now i'm definitely staying with git.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 17:15

>>28
You should check out Dragonfly. They use git, but it's probably unpopular enough to make up for that.
And it's definitely enterprise-ready:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/
HAMMER is designed for use on storage media greater than 50G.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 18:14

>>5
Complex vs Intuitive
Oh, it's that argument again.

Pile-of-files repository vs Single file repository
I read that as "might be fast" vs "it's certainly either slow or corruption-prone". BTW on a Git repo after packing the bulk of the data is in a single file, plus a rebuildable index.

Uses "rebase" vs Immutable
This is the buggiest argument of them all. I read it as "does what I tell it to do" vs "insufferable piece of shit that forces a certain way of doing things down your throat and heavily penalizes mistakes". That way of thinking reminds me of Subversion.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -