/prog/ - I lost 200K thanks to Ruby on Rails

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:04

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4814598

STAY AWAY FROM THIS TECHNOLOGY

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:45

(15:11:12) DHH: before fastthread we had ~400 restarts/day (15:11:22) DHH: now we have perhaps 10 (15:11:29) Zed S.: oh nice (15:11:33) Zed S.: and that's still fastcgi right?

Rails is a Ghetto, NEVER FORGET

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:41

>>1
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:43

Why? Because we've always shown our customers respect by creating great software
I rorudo

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:46

Best wishes,
>
Amy

That should clear some things up. Perhaps it's not RoR to blame, this time.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:56

>>5
Not all female programmers are Leah Culver.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:01

>>6
Not all female programmers have labia cleavage.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:06

>>6,7
No programmers are female

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:07

>>8
Not all female programmers are male.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:09

R5RS on Raft-of-Serpents

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 16:20

>>10
Why are those letters bold? I don't get it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 17:01

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ``I know, I'll use Ruby on Rails''. Now they have two problems.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 19:44

cleave mine labiae

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:05

What the fuck is Charm?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:29

>>14
quark

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:41

>>15
Am I the only one who was explained subatomic particles were the smallest building blocks of all matter until I started reading books outside of my school?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:46

>>16
I was explained atoms were the smallest building blocks at school.

Now I'm a computer engineering undergraduate. To be honest, I don't really understand what the standard model is trying to claim.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:21

dat discussion
rails core members comfirmed for idiots. Enjoy your shitty language and framework rubyfags

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

ruby on fails + start a startup morons = guaranteed catastrophic failure

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

>>18
Your post reeks of /g/, please go back there.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:34

https://twitter.com/amyhoy/status/94166175247908864

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:03

>>21
typical woman ``programmer''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:37

>>22
You may generalize that to ``typical ``programmer''''. Most people are idiots, and that still holds for the subset of people who are programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:24

>>21
I'd never hire anyone who can't properly put up a UBANTO Linux server given US$ 100,000 and is a fat woman.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:35

>>24
or uses RoR

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:57

>>25
More like LoL right? xD

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:00

>>26
The average League of Legends user is actually about 20% smarter than the average Ruby on Rails user.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:01

It appears that Charm is/was a customer-facing ticketing system much like desk.com or zendesk.com. If they gave me even half of the money they wasted, I'd be able to build them a highly scalable product using good ole PHP

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:06

>>28
For $100K, I'd even build them one using Brainfuck.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

yeah, let's use the slowest scripting language with the shittiest linux and a bloated framework and hope for the best. nothing can go wrong right

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

>>21
God damn. What a hambeast.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:19

http://unicornfree.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/newamybio.jpg
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:30

>>32
Would you play hide the salami with her, /frogs/?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:57

>>21,32
Amyhoy, matey!

Name: Anal Anus 2012-11-23 3:26

I have googled for ``anal anus'' and have found that there is actually a band with that name
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Anal+Anus

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:26

https://twitter.com/amyhoy/statuses/189072763590418432

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:29

>>36
Thankfully, no one ever offers to pay her for anything ever

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 5:09

>>36
An incompetent Macfag who blames her failure on the tools instead of her own inability to use Ubuntu? Who would have thought!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:28

>>38
Any sane person knows Linux on the desktop is shit. Mac OS X is a great UNIX distribution with a great user interface, unlike Gnome, KDE, Unity, and those tiling wm that we left behind with Windows 1.0. (And support for Photoshop, Illustrator and other commercial software)

Remember: Linux on the desktop is only free if your time is worthless.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:34

>>39
http://reddit.com

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 10:11

>>39
Mac OS X
enjoy your untrustable closed-source software

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:07

>>41
le /g/ /b/rofist XD

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:27

>>41
Enjoy your kernel panics with ruby.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:17

>>42
That does not consitute a logical argument. Try again when you've taken a class in formal logic, cretin.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:27

>>44
As a Doctor of Philosophy, I feel offended by your post.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:31

>>45
What in?
>>44
Assumes logic is a necessary condition of rhetoric.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:34

>>46
It is, unless you're a politician.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

>>47
Or a lawyer, juror, judge, doctor, teacher, journalist, or audience. Logos is not only not necessary, but entirely neglected from most mainstream rhetoric. A courtroom isn't the setting of Jerry Springer-esque shows because people are interested in listening to compelling, logical arguments but because they want to watch as two sides attack each other with fallacies that appeals to authority and emotion.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

>>44
But you're using an argumentum ad logicam fallacy, so you're dumb.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:48

>>45
As a witch doctor, transwomyn, neo-ethnic, pansexual, pony-spiritual, nonquasihomoabnormative, zoonecrosexual, dual channel, stereoscopic Alpine-with-a-20-inch-subwoofer/galactic/arboreal otherkin, reincarnated nigress princess, I am offended by your post

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:50

>>49
The claims in this thread are sad. Mostly because we are so willing to call argument what is clearly dissent.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:02

>>50
I am not sorry that my education and capacity for logic offend you, it is actually quite pleasureable.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:05

shut the fuck up

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:08

^SHUT _THE ^FUCK _UP!!!

I AM INTELLIGENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:34

>>32
MAN THE HARPOONS

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:42

>>55
http://blog.phusion.nl/2012/08/06/amy-hoy-to-speak-at-bubbleconf/

Update: unfortunately, Amy Hoy has recently informed us that she is unable to make it out to BubbleConf due to health issues.

LEL

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:43

Some EXPERT PROGRAMMER(s) should write a shitload of ``web apps'' in Haskell or Common Lisp, license them all under the AGPL for anyone to install on a server within 10 minutes, and watch as these le pretentious faggots and hambeasts lose ``le clients''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:45

>>57
This.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:59

>>58
You're not fooling anyone, >>57-san.

Name: Not >>57 nor >>58 2012-11-23 14:02

>>59
I actually like the idea, but I don't think it would steal their clients. I mean, no rounded corners, no cloud icons, no clients.

Name: moot !Ep8pui8Vw2 2012-11-23 14:08

>>57
common lispu
U MENA SCHEME?

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:08

>>60
The pretentious faggot and hambeast ``web developers'' could start being referred to as ``corner rounders''. That's gotta be worth something.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:14

>>60,62
But round corners are nice ]:

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:17

>>62
Makes sense. I'll start calling them ``corner rounders'' from now on.

That applies to you too, Javashit troll.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 15:43

I gotta agree, corner rounder is a perfect epithet for web2.0 cockslurpers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 16:16

>>21
From the announcement
>so far, we've had zero luck in our attempts to grow by hiring developers

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I lost 200K thanks to Ruby on Rails

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:04

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:45

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:41

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:43

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:46

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:56

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:01

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:06

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:07

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:09

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 16:20

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 17:01

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 19:44

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:05

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:29

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:41

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:46

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:21

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:34

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:03

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:37

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:24

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:35

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:57

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:00

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:01

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:06

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:19

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:30

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:57

35 Name: Anal Anus 2012-11-23 3:26

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:26

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:29

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 5:09

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:28

40 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:34

41 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 10:11

42 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:07

43 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:27

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:17

45 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:27

46 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:31

47 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:34

48 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

49 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

50 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:48

51 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:50

52 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:02

53 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:05

54 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:08

55 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:34

56 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:42

57 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:43

58 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:45

59 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:59

60 Name: Not >>57 nor >>58 2012-11-23 14:02

61 Name: moot !Ep8pui8Vw2 2012-11-23 14:08

62 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:08

63 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:14

64 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:17

65 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 15:43

66 Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 16:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 10:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 11:56

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 12:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 16:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 17:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 19:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 20:46

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:32

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 21:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-22 22:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 0:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:19

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:30

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 2:57

Name: Anal Anus 2012-11-23 3:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:26

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 4:29

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 5:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:28

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 9:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 10:11

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 11:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 12:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 13:59

Name: Not >>57 nor >>58 2012-11-23 14:02

Name: moot !Ep8pui8Vw2 2012-11-23 14:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 14:17

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 15:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-11-23 16:16