Set in the near future, as the economy continues its contractions which induce market shocks, the sense that a total societal collapse nears. Food shortages and electricity brownouts/blackouts cause riots, which leads to martial law and crackdown from the state. Many people are taken to concentration camps, and masses of hungry people are taken to refugee camps.
It's at these refugee camps that it begins. Without video games and access to Internet pornography, men who have been suppressed and discriminated against by the matriarchy can no longer contain their rage. It starts small at first, with reports of isolated incidents of rape in the camps spreading through grapevines. Then more and more men get the same idea. Soon, there are bands of men taking turns on lone women. This quickly escalates, the men invigorated for the first time in their lives with excitement of stalking and taking prey. Unable to contain the growing violence, the male camp guards themselves throw in the towel and join in on the rape frenzy. The entire camp is nothing but wall to wall rape.
The unwilling whores are taken, stripped naked, and power-fucked by the eager crowds of men. The more liberal or feminist the whore, the more harsh her punishment. The moderately ugly or fat women are raped for hours, and then they are beaten until they are purple and bloody, and then they are executed in any number of manners. The exceedingly grotesque women are killed in slow and painful manners beginning immediately. The more naturally attractive women are taken as concubines, child-bearers, and sex slaves, although if she doesn't learn to obey her new master, she too can be disposed of. White knights and lesbianized beta males who protest are given the rope treatment, with a sign reading "I betrayed my brothers" hanging around their necks as they are hoisted into the air to hang till death.
This soon spreads beyond the camps, and into the general population, as the situation grows beyond what the military can contain. As this great saga continues, men begin to compete in tournaments of martial combat for the right to take the most attractive females. Women are traded as if they are currency.
The big societal reset has finally occurred, and the millions of whores finally got what they deserved. The patriarchy is reborn!
>>1
Meanwhile, a relatively small group of gender-rejecting civil rights activists courageously keeps the barbaric tribes away from the sacred land (which they call The University) using high-tech weapons and automated battle drones. Thanks to civil rights and the resulting prosperity which allowed for technological advancement, every member of the group has, on average, between two and three terabytes of pornographic material on their personal Lisputers. Since gender was eliminated from their culture a long time ago, males and females no longer felt alien to each other, which greatly diminished the stress associated with partner-finding.
>>7
The thing you need to understand is that liberalism's days are numbered. The egalitarian principle underlying liberalism, that everyone is equal, will no longer be able to be maintained, and the natural order of things will be restored.
It was predestined. You see, peak liberalism is intrinsically tied to peak oil.
>>4
Adverse effects of pornography? Yes, porn has adverse effects on the individual, but you must understand that the feminist movement could not have had its success over the past three or four decades without the simultaneous wide-spread promulgation of pornography. Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.
Throw in video games and other cheap forms of entertainment, and suddenly you have whole generations of young men and teenaged boys beta males who are unwilling to compete and would rather just stay in their parents basements.
Meanwhile, women and teenaged girls are elevated to above-equal status via media propaganda and through legislation, diversity requirements in workplaces and higher education, etc. Men are portrayed as idiots in the media, whereas women are shown that they can have their cake and eat it too. And due to their programmed docility, men just ignore it and go with the flow.
Remove pornography and video games, and that which has castrated men will be no more. That day is coming.
>>11,12
It ``makes sense'' in the sense that it's complete and obvious bullshit to anyone not desperate to believe in a global misandrist conspiracy. It's lunatic MRA drivel.
Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.
Frequent masturbation raises testosterone levels.
Meanwhile, women and teenaged girls are elevated to above-equal status via media propaganda and through legislation, diversity requirements in workplaces and higher education, etc.
How far do you have to have your head up your own ass to believe this?
>>13
Do you watch TV? Men are portrayed as idiots in the media, whereas women are shown that they can have their cake and eat it too.
This perfectly describes advertising in the UK.
>>15
I'm going to notice something out of the ordinary much more than something that isn't.
I suppose your omniscience and total impartiality allowed you to easily consider all things at once and quickly find that the phenomenon is significantly less pronounced than I believed.
If that's the case, then I yield.
total dubs frenzy >>21
back to SomethingAwful, please
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 21:17
>>8
I guess you can't read. It clearly says in the post that gender had been eliminated from their culture, so your ``women'' doesn't even make sense.
>>9 The egalitarian principle underlying liberalism, that everyone is equal, will no longer be able to be maintained, and the natural order of things will be restored.
The idea is that everyone has equal rights, not that they're literally pairwise identical in every possible way. It's a matter of convention, much like civil rights. Sure, stable societies can be freedom-less autocracies too, but I don't want to live there and neither do many people.
>>10 Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.
That's probably wrong, but even were it to be true, what's wrong with having less violent illogical macho douchebags in society?
and suddenly you have whole generations of young men and teenaged boys beta males who are unwilling to compete
First off, fuck off with the Greek letter shit. Now, compete for what? Socio-economic status? Political power? Women? I suppose their gender role is to be the one working like an ass and bringing stuff in for their family (since they must have children), and the woman must stay at home. Fuck you and your idiotic small-scale-natural-selection rabid-capitalism life-wasting idiocy.
>>13 Frequent masturbation raises testosterone levels. Wrong! Peer-reviewed medical science shows that frequent masturbation lowers testosterone levels to as little as 30% of what's natural, and that abstaining from masturbation for as little as 7 days raises it back to normal. In other words, it went back up 150% from the frequent masturbation baseline.
This psychologist discusses how young men were cured of their melancholy and depression by abstaining from pornography and masturbation, thus achieving normal testosterone levels: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
>>23 That's probably wrong, but even were it to be true, what's wrong with having less violent illogical macho douchebags in society?
Without real men protecting a society from mass immigration and subversion of wealth by violently overthrowing corrupt governments, the society enters full on collapse. Native birth rates plummet below replacement levels, and within a century or two, the people of the original society go extinct, subsumed into the most dominant cultures of the invading foreign immigrant populations. This is happening right now in all Western nations. Europeans are going extinct. In other words, you have bought your Women's Liberation movement by killing the near future society.
Leading demographers, sociologists, and other thinkers discuss the problem:
You are spouting feminist lies!
Then why is it that feminists are now trying to ban pornography?
This psychologist discusses how young men were cured of their melancholy and depression by abstaining from pornography and masturbation, thus achieving normal testosterone levels
There's a difference between watching porn and being literally addicted to it.
Without real men protecting a society from mass immigration and subversion of wealth by violently overthrowing corrupt governments, the society enters full on collapse.
Excellent way to prove my point of gender being evil and destructive. ``Real men don't care about presumption of innocence and due process of law, that's shit's for beta faggots. We real men beat the fuck up out of everyone we want, yeah!'' Also, violence never solves anything; if history taught us anything, it's that at the end of a violent revolution, the new government is worse than the previous (because you have a bunch of illogical violent shitheads in power).
Native birth rates plummet below replacement levels, and within a century or two, the people of the original society go extinct, subsumed into the most dominant cultures of the invading foreign immigrant populations.
There's too many fucking people on this planet anyway. That being said, immigration does become an issue if the immigrants aren't required to understand and respect the civil rights in the society they immigrate to (just look at illegal Sharia courts in the UK).
This is happening right now in all Western nations. Europeans are going extinct.
Waah waah our genes are better than those of those filthy immigrants, who cares if some are better-educated than us.
In other words, you have bought your Women's Liberation movement by killing the near future society.
Trading off civil rights for anything else is completely fucking unacceptable.
Feminists are suicidal and unwilling to accept the scientific facts when it doesn't agree with their politically correct views.
While I agree that political correctness should be destroyed with fire, you seem to be having a problem with not being able to control what other people are doing that doesn't concern you. If every other white male in your society decides to get a vasectomy, there's nothing you can do about it because it's their fucking right.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 23:08
>>23
Now, I'll answer your other questions and arguments.
The idea is that everyone has equal rights, not that they're literally pairwise identical in every possible way. It's a matter of convention, much like civil rights.
The Universe only recognizes might. Might makes Right. Duty to one's ancestors and sacrifice for the future of your tribe, your community, and your nation are ultimately more important than rights. Rights are for self-entitled, selfish, narcissistic individuals who are too weak to defend or fight for what they believe in. The government, which grants you your so called rights, often ignores people's rights in a hypocritical fashion. There are many people in prison in various nations, their rights abused because they thought rights were something intrinsic that will always be there to protect them. They were sold a lie. You were sold a lie. When the economy continues to collapse, you will realize your rights won't save you.
Sure, stable societies can be freedom-less autocracies too, but I don't want to live there and neither do many people.
This is how the Universe works. If you don't like it, you can always kill yourself and give the rest of us some more living room.
Now, compete for what? Socio-economic status? Political power? Women? I suppose their gender role is to be the one working like an ass and bringing stuff in for their family (since they must have children), and the woman must stay at home. Fuck you and your idiotic small-scale-natural-selection rabid-capitalism life-wasting idiocy.
Compete for the right to exist. The right to carry on in a resource-constrained world. The victory of the stronger will over that of the weak. The amalgamation and concentration of power.
Why do you think that equality is axiomatic and morally good? Are you suggesting we should just hold hands in peace, living in our democratic globalist capitalist society, pointlessly consuming material goods and ensuring diversity and equality for everyone until the Universe wears down thermodynamically and can no longer support life? What will have been the point of it all?
Equality is tantamount to entropic death of civilization. It is suicidal.
>>29 Duty to one's ancestors and sacrifice for the future of your tribe, your community, and your nation are ultimately more important than rights.
Says who? Sky-daddy?
Rights are for self-entitled, selfish, narcissistic individuals who are too weak to defend or fight for what they believe in. The government, which grants you your so called rights, often ignores people's rights in a hypocritical fashion.
I think you don't understand rights. I am strong and what I fight for are my rights, for what I should be allowed to do simply because it is nobody else's business. I wouldn't be fighting if all governments suddenly stopped violating people's rights.
This is how the Universe works. If you don't like it, you can always kill yourself and give the rest of us some more living room.
No, I can kill you (and the fucktards like yourself) and give myself more living room.
Compete for the right to exist. The right to carry on in a resource-constrained world. The victory of the stronger will over that of the weak. The amalgamation and concentration of power.
Sounds like someone built a time machine and brought a king/emperor/dictator from 1000 years ago.
Are you suggesting we should just hold hands in peace, living in our democratic globalist capitalist society, pointlessly consuming material goods and ensuring diversity and equality (in rights) for everyoneuntil the Universe wears down thermodynamically and can no longer support life? What will have been the point of it all?
I highlighted the things I agree with. Our sun will run out way before the Universe has its heat death; if you really want the survival of our species, you should be focusing about getting people to stop fighting and wasting their time over resources and work on space travel and colonization.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 23:22
>>28 Then why is it that feminists are now trying to ban pornography?
Because feminist women believe in the mythos of their little fantasy world of equal-rights. The believe they can have their cake and eat it too. They have been unable to see the objective effects of feminist policies on the western world, so what makes you think they are unable to see how pornography fits into that? They ignore the real science and truths that conflicts with their views, calling it as "sexist science," which falsely conflates it as a priori patriarchal discrimination against women--even though it's empirically true.
Women want to be in control of their own lives, but they believe they can force men to serve them. They think they can have their equal rights, and be able to force men to not have access to pornography, or video games, or macho movies. Do you not see the hypocrisy? They think that all video games must bend to the will of the feminist movement.
Modern third-wave feminism isn't about equality, it's about going against nature, about destroying society.
>>29
The universe doesn't recognize shit. People have cobbled justice and safety, wresting them away from the uncaring world time again, and even if there's any moment at which your shitty racist Sci-fi warlordism takes place, it will be replaced once more by solidarity and law.
Now go masturbate to ``High''-Fantasy book covers again.
>>32
And by law/justice you mean rights enforcement, correct?
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 23:34
>>30 Also, violence never solves anything; if history taught us anything, it's that at the end of a violent revolution, the new government is worse than the previous (because you have a bunch of illogical violent shitheads in power).
Try watching my videos, specifically the one of the Opiate of Peace. Peaceful protest never solves anything. Gandhi was only successful because his followers violently revolted against the British--thousands died.
You haven't been providing sources or citations for your arguments, because, let's face it, you have no evidence to support your claims. All you have are eel-good appeals to emotion, leftist rhetoric and liberal talking-points.
Sounds like someone built a time machine and brought a king/emperor/dictator from 1000 years ago.
Today's liberal societies are a modern phenomenon and they will be short lived. No one can stop the collapse. Not even a bunch of liberal feel-good peace-lovers like yourself. You'll be holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" as the mobs of hungry plebeians storms your camp and butchers you for your meat. And if you don't thinking starving humans aren't capable of cannibalism, think again. Only the strong will survive.
>>33
Yes, by force if necessary. And overthrowing of tyrants, and resistance against the purveyors of violence.
No, it's not a contradiction, not anymore than it is to build a house from dirt, or fighting for peace. You think nobody would stand up against your shitty brand of fascism because anyone willing to do so would be on your side. Well, think twice.
>>35 Yes, by force if necessary. And overthrowing of tyrants,
Sure, as long as force is used only as required, and that a fair trial is ensured. Also, life is a right that only its owner may forfeit.
and resistance against the purveyors of violence.
Uh oh, here you're referring to condemning people who call to violence, not to banning cryptography and wiretapping everyone to really make sure nobody ever utters a sexist joke so that women everywhere may finally feel safe, right?
You think nobody would stand up against your shitty brand of fascism
Whoa whoa, I'm not >>31,34. I agree with the rest of your post.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-29 23:56
>>35
This time around, no one will be able to finance an opposition to fascism. Peak oil has passed. The International bankers who brought America, Britain and the USSR to oppose Germany won't be able to play the same hat trick again.
Fascism/National Socialism are in harmony with nature. It is inevitable. Even now, Golden Dawn of Greece is growing, currently at 14% of popularity. By the time of the next election, it will be the second or perhaps even the most popular party. Other nationalist movements are rising up all across Western and Eastern Europe. In Italy. Spain. Ukraine just elected a National Socialist party. Serbia's recent election resulted in a coalition government between the National Socialists and the Right-wing Conservatives.
>>36 Also, life is a right that only its owner may forfeit.
I'd change 'may' with 'should', as I believe such rights only exist in so far as that the >>31,34 of the world are stopped from trampling them.
Uh oh, here you're referring to condemning people who call to violence, not to banning cryptography and wiretapping everyone to really make sure nobody ever utters a sexist joke so that women everywhere may finally feel safe, right?
Haven't thought about this a whole lot, but I have a vague notion that such things should be met with proportional force. Speech with speech, other forces with care, yes, if it comes to stop Benito here were his dream to come true, calls to arms with such, likewise with bullets. We can do it ourselves, no need to get the police, secret or otherwise, involved. It's fuzzy, I know, but I can't think of much else.
>>38 I'd change 'may' with 'should', as I believe such rights only exist in so far as that the >>31,34 of the world are stopped from trampling them.
The notable exception are immediate threats to one's life/health (e.g. self-defence) or that of others, of course. If >>31,34 is about to shoot someone in the head and the only way you can stop that is by killing them, then it's okay. Executing an imprisoned criminal is, however, not acceptable, since they are no longer an immediate threat.
Haven't thought about this a whole lot
You should. The right to privacy, freedom of expression (with the usual call-to-violence exception), and the right to cryptography are very important, and it's important to realize that before you go on a crusade against Benito and start (oh the irony) revoking people's rights along the way.
>>37
So over the top. But it's so beautiful to think that you're for real, Francisco, it just makes your trolling so much more enjoyable.
By the way, there's no Mussolini nor Hitler to support the propping up of fascist dictators on impoverished countries, so don't count on that.
¡No pasarán!
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 0:27
>>38
It's funny how you ignore reality. Some people really can't handle the truth.
Yes, it's good to stand up and fight for what you believe in. But the equality that you fight for is destroying you from the inside. And you are unwilling to admit this. Soon, there won't be anything left to defend. America is burning. The EU is burning. The bubbles in China are about to collapse.
Difference is what underlies everything in this world. Hierarchy is what is natural. Nothing at all could exist without some unity of opposing forces. The laws of physics would not work if there was not more than a singular static state. Computation would be non-existent. Equality is static. Seeking equality is the path to entropic death.
>>39
I was more thinking on the exceptional situations in which the framework for such protection must be established, and then maintained.
And well, I wasn't railing against such rights, or any other, in any manner, rather than saying that I haven't a fleshed-out framework for the use of force, of what sort or by whom.
But I don't see how advocating against and resisting hateful speech is in any way opposed to freedom of speech, if I'm tying correctly such a theme to this discussion, and forum.
>>42 But I don't see how advocating against and resisting hateful speech is in any way opposed to freedom of speech, if I'm tying correctly such a theme to this discussion, and forum.
Congratulations, you truly understand freedom of speech!
>>45 America will so impoverished, it'll be dealing with its own Second Civil War, unable to impose its will of globalist socialist-democracy
Oh god my sides.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 0:53
>>46
Yes, we all know on paper The United States is constitutional republic. But today's politicians in the US don't care about the constitution. They care about democracy. Globalism. Social engineering. Government legislation to control markets to benefit interest groups and lobbyist corporations. Military force to ensure every country adopts a Rothschild-Rockefeller central bank (what do you think the wars in the Middle East are truly about?). Today's Republicans and Conservatives are just yesterday's Democrats and Liberals. All parties have been sliding more towards the left over the decades.
Watch these news clips. It's all about "democracy" and "social engineering" and forcing it via military aggression and media propaganda if necessary. But as we see, "democracy" is just used a faux justification for installing obedient central banks to funnel out the assets of the various nations.
>>51
No, that's never going to happen. I want the genderqueer faggot to get anal cancer so he can get fucked anymore or something (though he'd probably rather die than give up the xoxk and continue his frenzied homosexing anyway).
>That's probably wrong, but even were it to be true, what's wrong with having less violent illogical macho douchebags in society?
LOL you retard, you honestly think high-testosterone men are "violent illogical macho douchebags?" You pathetic faggot. Let me drop some knowledge on you.
>In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, 91 healthy men (24.32±2.73 years) received a transdermal administration of 50 mg of testosterone (n = 46) or a placebo (n = 45). Subsequently, subjects participated in a simple task, in which their payoff depended on the self-reported outcome of a die-roll. Subjects could increase their payoff by lying without fear of being caught. Our results show that testosterone administration substantially decreases lying in men.
>Testosterone is known to influence brain development and reproductive physiology but also plays an important role in social behavior [4]–[9]. While most studies have investigated a potential association between testosterone and aggressive behavior, two recent studies suggest that testosterone may also increase prosocial behavior or lead to less selfish behavior in certain situations [6], [9]. We therefore investigate a link between testosterone and self-serving lying. A prominent interpretation of the existing evidence on the role of testosterone in social behavior is that the hormone enhances dominance behavior, i.e., behavior intended to gain high social status [6]–[8], [10]–[14], which in humans can be aggressive or prosocial depending on the context. Recent research suggests that pride may have evolved as an affective mechanism for motivating such status seeking behavior [15]. Pride is indirectly linked to status seeking because it is an inward directed emotion that signals high status or ego. It has been speculated that testosterone helps translate such motivation into action, for example, in acts of heroic altruism [16], [17]. Importantly, an effect of testosterone on behavior via pride should also work if behavior cannot be observed by others and an individual’s status in the eyes of the others may therefore not be directly affected.
Low-testosterone men are just flat-out inferior. They are weak sniveling parasites with no sense of moral behavior or pride, and they are responsible for all of the cultural rot now afflicting the great human civilization that high-testosterone men built so valiantly over so many years. You probably are one, as is everyone else who posted in this thread.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:27
>>53
You don't get it yet do you? The freedom lovers will be classified as enemies of the state by the very government pushing the very liberal policies you so defend. Liberalism is actually anti-freedom, but tricks the mind by preempting the notion of individual freedom within its own nomenclature. When the individual freedom of liberalism becomes more important than the future freedom of the entire society, the people who have been pushing liberalism upon the masses reveal their real plans of tyranny and conquest.
Militia members, survivalists, independent farmers, military veterans, constitutionalists, open source software advocates, and other freedom supporters will suddenly be classified as terrorists by the US government. And if you're of White European descent, you're a double-terrorist. It's already in official DHS reports and US Army field manuals.
Get ready.
A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
>>56
I have no pride (such things are idiotic and illogical), and my morality is firmly grounded in the golden rule. I also never lie, even when I refuse to give information. I masturbate about twice a day.
and they are responsible for all of the cultural rot now afflicting the great human civilization that high-testosterone men built so valiantly over so many years.
Prove it, shithead.
>>57 Militia members, survivalists, independent farmers, military veterans, constitutionalists, open source software advocates, and other freedom supporters will suddenly be classified as terrorists by the US government.
The government can't take such a major decision unless a substantial (over half, even) part of the population agrees. And the only way that's going to happen is if idiotic freedom-hating shitheads like yourself keep spreading your diseased rhetoric around and actually manage to convince enough people that life is so much better without rights and freedom.
Also, I don't live in the US, so enjoy your FEMA death camps.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:39
>>58
You're just an effeminate beta-fag trying to justify your degenerate lifestyle and disgusting addiction to getting off, which causes brain damage like that found in drug addicts.
>>59 The government can't take such a major decision unless a substantial (over half, even) part of the population agrees.
That's not how it works in America. Democracy is a sham. Do you think even half of the people agreed for America to go to war in Iraq back in 2003? And yet, America went to war.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:44
>>60
Holy shit. This totally describes many of today's frequent-masturbating youth.
Frontal Lobe Damage
As a feedback of sorts, the frontal lobes also atrophy, or shrink. Think of it as a “wearing out of the brake pads.” This physical and functional decline in the judgment center of the brain causes the person to become impaired in his ability to process the consequences of acting out in addiction. Addiction scientists have called this condition hypofrontality, and have noted a similarity in the behavior of addicted persons to the behavior of patients with frontal brain damage.
Neurosurgeons frequently treat people with frontal lobe damage. In a car crash, for instance, the driver’s brain will often decelerate into the back of his forehead inside his skull, bruising the frontal lobes. Patients with frontal lobe damage exhibit a constellation of behaviors we call frontal lobe syndrome. First, these patients are impulsive, in that they thoughtlessly engage in activities with little regard to the consequences. Second, they are compulsive; they become fixated or focused on certain objects or behaviors, and have to have them, no matter what. Third, they become emotionally labile, and have sudden and unpredictable mood swings. Fourth, they exhibit impaired judgment.
>>60
I have the right to do whatever the fuck I want (as long as I'm not overstepping my bounds), including a 10 hour masturbation marathon if I desire so. I am also opposed to drug regulations. You don't like it? Come say it to my face and see what happens. Bring some of your friends too, and don't forget to trespass on my property.
Die in a fire you cock sucking cretin.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:46
>>63
wouldn't be surprising to find out that increased diagnosis of ADD/ADHD in teenagers is due to the use of pornography and frequent masturbation.
>>62 Democracy is a sham. Do you think even half of the people agreed for America to go to war in Iraq back in 2003? And yet, America went to war.
If you're going to talk out of your ass, at least make it hard to prove that you're wrong. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-16-poll-iraq_x.htm
``If the U.N. Security Council rejects a resolution paving the way for military action, only 54% of Americans favor a U.S. invasion. And if the Bush administration does not seek a final Security Council vote, support for a war drops to 47%.''
>>63
Have you considered that there might exist other explanations for that behaviour? Of course not, your brain damage is much too extensive for you to comprehend simple logic.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:51
>>64 I have the right to do whatever the fuck I want (as long as I'm not overstepping my bounds), including a 10 hour masturbation marathon if I desire so. I am also opposed to drug regulations. You don't like it? Come say it to my face and see what happens. Bring some of your friends too, and don't forget to trespass on my property.
You have just proven to everyone here that you're a self-entitled narcissist. You are mentally diseased. People like you didn't survive for very long before the advent of liberalism and the Enlightment. You were culled by society. Soon, such evolutionary pressures will be back and in full effect.
cretin
You're also now confirmed for being that person the entire board loathes. Why do you even hang out here? No one likes you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:54
>>66
You do know those polls are all bogus, right? They only call landlines, and only old baby boomers and retirees still have/had landlines, even back in 2003. They get all of their news from TV, and all mainstream television is fake, designed to engineer consent.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:54
69GET
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 2:57
[quote]People like you didn't survive for very long before the advent of liberalism and the Enlightment. You were culled by society.[/quote]
No, that isn't what happened. They just conformed to the prevailing social norms of their culture, and ultimately weren't too much more antisocial than normal people.
>>70
That's true. I did exaggerate things. Society didn't tolerate self-entitlement and narcissism out in the open like it does now. But if you did step out of line with your self-entitlement, you'd often find yourself being challenged to a duel or at least a fist fight.
You're also now confirmed for being that person the entire board loathes. Why do you even hang out here? No one likes you.
Nice projection. It thrills me to know that I'm now the jewspammer's arch-nemesis.
>>68
Right, sorry. It must still have been a fairly large percentage anyway.
>I have no pride (such things are idiotic and illogical)
That's an interesting statement given that you clearly take a stunted sort of pride in imagining yourself to be some rational paragon and not the creature of flesh and base motivations that you are.
>and my morality is firmly grounded in the golden rule.
>>74 That's an interesting statement given that you clearly take a stunted sort of pride in imagining yourself to be some rational paragon and not the creature of flesh and base motivations that you are.
I take no pride in that; I simply try to react the best I can with the information I have. It's the basis of, uh, being a non-idiotic human.
Sounds myopic.
Then present a counterexample where the golden rule falls short of being sufficient to derive what's the right thing to do.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:13
>>73
No, really, no one likes you. You are an idiot and way worse than the Jewspammer. At least he didn't shit the place up with arrogant flame wars.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:14
>>73
You're deluded if you think there's only one person who posts revealing things about Jews here. You, on the other hand, are the only one who goes into a complete mental tirade in shit-flooding the board to forum slide and kill threads. That is why you are loathed. Because you are so self-entitled that you can't allow anything that challenges your world view to exist in your sphere.
You say you are pro-freedom, but you are anti-freedom. You are pro-censorship.
>>77
Stop pretending to care about the quality of this board.
>>78 You're deluded if you think there's only one person who posts revealing things about Jews here.
Sorry, must have been wishful thinking.
You, on the other hand, are the only one who goes into a complete mental tirade in shit-flooding the board to forum slide and kill threads.
Why don't you sage your shitposts, then?
That is why you are loathed. Because you are so self-entitled that you can't allow anything that challenges your world view to exist in your sphere.
I do allow it, that's why I even reply to your idiotic shit once in a while. What you really want is to keep posting idiotic content and have nobody challenge you for it.
You say you are pro-freedom, but you are anti-freedom. You are pro-censorship.
I didn't know that tearing your cretinoid arguments to pieces constituted censorship. Oh well.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:22
Wow, he just proved his mental instability, he flew off of the deep end for a bit there. What a hypocrite. He says he is "pro-freedom" but he always resorts to shit-flooding to censor threads he doesn't like.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:23
>>101
You are a faggot who wants to bring in /q/ and mods. You are pro-censorship.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:25
>>101 What you really want is to keep posting idiotic content and have nobody challenge you for it.
Your idea of challenging something appears to be to ignore the factual evidence and citations, stick your fingers in your ears, and to shit-flood as much as possible.
This thread is none the less dildos, and not at all related to programming.
Name:
2012-10-30 3:27
Name:
2012-10-30 3:27
Name:
2012-10-30 3:27
Name:
2012-10-30 3:27
Name:
2012-10-30 3:28
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:28
>>103
Yeah, I think we all know it's him who has been petitioning moot to bring moderation to the text boards. He's so fucking selfish he's going to ruin it all for everyone just so he doesn't have to deal with the ugly truth once in a while. He wants to live in his little liberalized fantasy world, and so he must force everything around him to conform to his views via censorship. He is anti-freedom.
Name:
2012-10-30 3:28
check my trips
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:28
>>105
Programming is for fags. This is /brog/ - brogramming!
>I am also opposed to drug regulations. You don't like it? Come say it to my face and see what happens.
LMAO, you actually think people here are going to be offended by your views on drug legalization? Get over yourself; fat druggie losers espousing worldviews equivalent to your own are a dime a dozen on the internet. I say this as someone who supports marijuana legalization (but not harder drugs, because I'm not an insane left-libertarian blowhard).
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:31
>>114 nor am I the person who sometimes sagetanks antisemitic threads.
You've unfortunately confirmed that you in fact are, through your telltale usage of the word "cretin." But you are lying about it now. I guess all of that masturbation has kept your testosterone so low that you can't help it, can you? You truly are a degenerate.
>I take no pride in that; I simply try to react the best I can with the information I have. It's the basis of, uh, being a non-idiotic human.
You sound like a 115-IQ shithead. Enjoy your life of self-absorbed intellectual mediocrity and being absolutely STYLED on by people who are both more rational and manlier than you.
>>111,115
That's not me, obviously. Me arguing for censorship makes as much sense as Hitler running for president of the ACLU.
>>111 He wants to live in his little liberalized fantasy world, and so he must force everything around him to conform to his views via censorship.
As you can see, I'm not afraid to take you, faggot.
Your idea of challenging something appears to be to ignore the factual evidence and citations, stick your fingers in your ears, and to shit-flood as much as possible.
That's because your ``factual evidence'' is constituted of random JewTube videos and/or content provably irrelevant to the discussion. If you think I've wrongly disregarded some of your burning evidence, please show me where I have done so.
>>116 LMAO, you actually think people here are going to be offended by your views on drug legalization? Get over yourself; fat druggie losers espousing worldviews equivalent to your own are a dime a dozen on the internet. I say this as someone who supports marijuana legalization (but not harder drugs, because I'm not an insane left-libertarian blowhard).
About that; it's not about civil rights as much as it is about devaluing drugs so that the Mafia no longer finds them profitable. If things beyond marijuana were legalized, I would still not use them because I don't want to destroy my health.
>>117
Then it's an unfortunate coincidence. Surely, it's possible that two different people like using the same word, isn't it?
>>123 You sound like a 115-IQ shithead. Enjoy your life of self-absorbed intellectual mediocrity
You sure sound like an expect in human character.
and being absolutely STYLED on by people who are both more rational and manlier than you.
Because supposedly rational women cannot ``STYLE'' on me while rational men can? I wonder why.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 3:43
>>124 Me arguing for censorship makes as much sense as Hitler running for president of the ACLU.
Yet you have repeatedly argued that loli is bad and that pedos should be forcefully kidnapped and reeducated without having commutes a crime. Hypocrite.
>>126
In >>73 I didn't say I was ``the moderation guy''. At that point in time I thought >>67 was really referring to me (since it's not the first time I call the jewspammer ``cretin''), and was unaware of another poster who likes using the same word.
>>129 Yet you have repeatedly argued that loli is bad and that pedos should be forcefully kidnapped and reeducated without having commutes a crime. Hypocrite.
Paedophiles cannot achieve their ultimate sexual gratification (i.e. sex with someone they are attracted to) without rape. How would you have society deal with someone who has, for instance, a very strong rape and murder fetish and whose sexual gratification hinges on it?
>>135
I have nothing to gain from lying. Technically, all the antisemitic bullshit doesn't really belong here, on a programming board, so ``the moderation guy'' is not entirely wrong (although their reasons might be).
>>136
Speculation, and once again you ignore the question and sww the populist party line in place of an argument.
And the fact that you think it okay to ruin lives on the mere probability that someone might hurt someone, dispute not committing a crime before, is just as fascist the jewspammer.
You claim to be an enlightened liberal, but you want even animated images outlawed is very telling. You want to be the thought police.
>>139
My nationality has fuck-all to do with my discourse. And no, I know for a fact that my family tree doesn't have jews up to 5 generations (thanks to a somewhat antisemitic family member).
>>146 thanks to a somewhat antisemitic family member
At least someone in your family is intelligent. And no, it's not you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:05
>>42 But I don't see how advocating against and resisting hateful speech is in any way opposed to freedom of speech, if I'm tying correctly such a theme to this discussion, and forum.
Do you realize that every single board is full of Jew hate? /JP/, /a/, ect... not to mention /pol/. Why are you wasting your time in this forgotten dump?
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:07
>>146
We know you live in Norway. You probably volunteer or work for SOS Rasisme, or at least have in the past.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:10
>>150
lol, norway? too bad noted social justice activist anders behring breivik didn't get him
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:13
Speaking of Anders Behring Breivik, some useful intelligence you should know about...
>>144 And the fact that you think it okay to ruin lives on the mere probability that someone might hurt someone, dispute[sic] not committing a crime before, is just as fascist the jewspammer.
Sure, then wait until they actually try something with someone's kid. Is it okay to reeducate them then?
You claim to be an enlightened liberal, but you want even animated images outlawed is very telling.
Prosecuting for that is a bit silly (because there's no victim), but their presence is a good indicator of paedophilia. To the very least, once detected, paedophiles should be offered (and strongly recommended) treatment. I'm still undecided on whether such treatment should be forced when no real offence has been committed.
>>149
I didn't know the idiocy had spread to other boards too, I don't go there.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:28
>>199
Thought crime. You advocate for thought crime. Don't dress it up behind hyperbolic slippery slopes like that. Admit that you are a hypocritical fascist and be done with it. At least the jewspammer doesn't hide the fact that he is a murderous cunt. You just use emotional 'Think of the children' garbage.
To the very least, once detected, paedophiles should be offered (and strongly recommended) treatment. I'm still undecided on whether such treatment should be forced when no real offence has been committed.
You and I both know that that would end up a concentration camp as soon as voters found out. The only reason you don't fear it is because you would be on the outside.
[sic]
Fuck you. No one called you out then you wrote 'expect' instead of 'expert', asshole.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:28
>>201 I don't go there.
Because you're assigned and paid to monitor and disrupt the anti-Semitic activities on this board, amirite?
>>202 Thought crime. You advocate for thought crime.
I didn't say paedophilia is a crime, I just said it's a dangerous mental condition. Punishing someone with a mental condition is idiotic. Like I said before, I'm not sure what exactly is to be done in this case.
At least the jewspammer doesn't hide the fact that he is a murderous cunt.
I am against death penalty.
You and I both know that that would end up a concentration camp as soon as voters found out.
How's throwing them in prison better than treatment? Also, what's keeping voters from doing that to imprisoned paedophiles right now?
Fuck you. No one called you out then you wrote 'expect' instead of 'expert', asshole.
Oops, didn't notice. Sorry.
>>203
Oh no, you found me out, I'm an undercover member of the JIDF. Seriously?
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 4:58
>>202
Jewspammer here. Yes, I would very much like to see humanity solve the present population problem with overt wars and campaigns of conquest. Let's have fate decide who shall be the victor. That's the manly way to do it.
The people whom >>201 works for are solving it through completely covert and subversive means. They'll say they're doing what they do in the name freedom and liberty, meanwhile undermining that very thing. And they're fanatical about it. I think President Nixon said it best in the following video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTPyE6f7GnQ
"There's a strange malignancy that creeps among them."
>>215 That's the manly way to do it.
You mean the cruel and violent way to do it?
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 5:05
>>216
Actually, I'd say it's the more humane and dignified way to do it. It's fast and quick. What you don't understand is that covert and subversive method will end up with mass starvation at some point, not unlike what occurred in the USSR. A slow and painful way to die.
>>218
No, I'm not one of those people who wants to end all of humanity. Those people are crazy. I just agree that Earth is presently overpopulated. It never would have gotten this bad in the first place if it wasn't for the advent of Liberalism, like other posters have pointed out in this thread.
>>219 It never would have gotten this bad in the first place if it wasn't for the advent of Liberalism, like other posters have pointed out in this thread.
Actually, the people who most responsible of procreating too much are religious and/or right-wing and/or in third-world niggerland theocracies. Also, I disagree with >>218 in their desire to end humanity entirely, but certainly human population should be an order of magnitude smaller; and the best way to get to that is to convince people not to reproduce.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 5:23
Hi I’m the Jewspammer. You might remember me from such educational threads as "Your favorite Touhou and why do you hate Kikes" and "Jews did Anders Breivik".
>>220
[q]Actually, the people who most responsible of procreating too much are religious and/or right-wing and/or in third-world niggerland theocracies.[/q]
lol at thinking the fact that africans have shitloads of babies has anything to do with religion.
I'll pop you all into a group and call you inferior, insane, and weak.
Name:
2292012-10-31 5:16
AHEE! let's all post copy, swing naked on clothes-lines, and lick moot's shit-stained body.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-31 22:29
>>219 I just agree that Earth is presently overpopulated. It never would have gotten this bad in the first place if it wasn't for the advent of Liberalism
Weren't you the one blaming ``Liberalism'' for lowering the natality rates for the glorious white people and letting the jews/sandniggers ``win the fertility war''?
>>237
Hey Nikita, why haven't you created a DSL for optimizing your quotes?
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-24 12:40
>>26 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
Yup. The main problem: you have a limited production of dopamine, which acts as a brain currency, so abusing coffee or watching porn would just end into deflation and total stop of brain economy. On the other hand, if you start doing meth, you will get inflation, which will permanently fuckup everything.
Note, that the Jews themselves avoid porn, while selling it to goyim cattle.
Name:
Agents 69 2013-03-25 0:17
Agents 69 seen to be the comic you can get idea to develop your game : http://www.agents69.com
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-25 1:56
>>56 Low-testosterone men are just flat-out inferior. They are weak sniveling parasites with no sense of moral behavior or pride, and they are responsible for all of the cultural rot now afflicting the great human civilization that high-testosterone men built so valiantly over so many years. You probably are one, as is everyone else who posted in this thread.
If that's the case, why aren't steroid abusers such valiant civilization-builders?
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-25 2:18
>>241
You are in a dark room. You are surrounded by scraps of paper, old dried-out pizza crusts and bathroom tissues, some of which are impregnated with a nondescript substance. The light of a computer terminal is the main source of illumination.
>examine computer
The screensaver disappears as a result of your examination. It reveals a level 10 TROLL. The TROLL is currently dormant.
>engage troll
You engage the TROLL in combat. The TROLL awakens.
>use argument on troll
You use ARGUMENT-ATTACK on TROLL. The TROLL feeds on your ARGUMENT-ATTACK and gains 3 HP.
The TROLL replies with a NON-SEQUITUR-ATTACK. You experience a loss of faith in humanity, and lose 4 HP. You have 3 HP left.
>use logic
Your LOGIC-ATTACK has very little effect.
>examine troll
The TROLL has an unusually shaped upper body, and you discern some rectangular bumps underneath his clothes.
>oy vey
The TROLL screams "BIGGEST SHALOM TO THE BIGGEST KIKE ON /PROG/", whatever that means, and proceeds to self-detonation. The TROLL is now dead. You have won.