Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Total Rape Frenzy

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 10:57

Total Rape Frenzy
The Video Game

Set in the near future, as the economy continues its contractions which induce market shocks, the sense that a total societal collapse nears. Food shortages and electricity brownouts/blackouts cause riots, which leads to martial law and crackdown from the state. Many people are taken to concentration camps, and masses of hungry people are taken to refugee camps.

It's at these refugee camps that it begins. Without video games and access to Internet pornography, men who have been suppressed and discriminated against by the matriarchy can no longer contain their rage. It starts small at first, with reports of isolated incidents of rape in the camps spreading through grapevines. Then more and more men get the same idea. Soon, there are bands of men taking turns on lone women. This quickly escalates, the men invigorated for the first time in their lives with excitement of stalking and taking prey. Unable to contain the growing violence, the male camp guards themselves throw in the towel and join in on the rape frenzy. The entire camp is nothing but wall to wall rape.

The unwilling whores are taken, stripped naked, and power-fucked by the eager crowds of men. The more liberal or feminist the whore, the more harsh her punishment. The moderately ugly or fat women are raped for hours, and then they are beaten until they are purple and bloody, and then they are executed in any number of manners. The exceedingly grotesque women are killed in slow and painful manners beginning immediately. The more naturally attractive women are taken as concubines, child-bearers, and sex slaves, although if she doesn't learn to obey her new master, she too can be disposed of. White knights and lesbianized beta males who protest are given the rope treatment, with a sign reading "I betrayed my brothers" hanging around their necks as they are hoisted into the air to hang till death.

This soon spreads beyond the camps, and into the general population, as the situation grows beyond what the military can contain. As this great saga continues, men begin to compete in tournaments of martial combat for the right to take the most attractive females. Women are traded as if they are currency.

The big societal reset has finally occurred, and the millions of whores finally got what they deserved. The patriarchy is reborn!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 11:00

BILLION DOLLAR TECH STARTUP IDEA

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 11:01

More, more!

Some good writing OP.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 11:27

>>1
I'll use your kopipe the next time someone talks about the adverse effects of pornography.

Name: VIPPER 2012-10-29 11:56

11/10
Would read again.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 11:57

A great masterpiece of our time.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 13:31

>>1
Meanwhile, a relatively small group of gender-rejecting civil rights activists courageously keeps the barbaric tribes away from the sacred land (which they call The University) using high-tech weapons and automated battle drones.  Thanks to civil rights and the resulting prosperity which allowed for technological advancement, every member of the group has, on average, between two and three terabytes of pornographic material on their personal Lisputers.  Since gender was eliminated from their culture a long time ago, males and females no longer felt alien to each other, which greatly diminished the stress associated with partner-finding.

Name: VIPPER 2012-10-29 13:55

>>7
Women, robotics. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 13:58

>>7
The thing you need to understand is that liberalism's days are numbered. The egalitarian principle underlying liberalism, that everyone is equal, will no longer be able to be maintained, and the natural order of things will be restored.

It was predestined. You see, peak liberalism is intrinsically tied to peak oil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwoQKt2vbNY

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 14:07

>>4
Adverse effects of pornography? Yes, porn has adverse effects on the individual, but you must understand that the feminist movement could not have had its success over the past three or four decades without the simultaneous wide-spread promulgation of pornography. Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.

Throw in video games and other cheap forms of entertainment, and suddenly you have whole generations of young men and teenaged boys beta males who are unwilling to compete and would rather just stay in their parents basements.

Meanwhile, women and teenaged girls are elevated to above-equal status via media propaganda and through legislation, diversity requirements in workplaces and higher education, etc. Men are portrayed as idiots in the media, whereas women are shown that they can have their cake and eat it too. And due to their programmed docility, men just ignore it and go with the flow.

Remove pornography and video games, and that which has castrated men will be no more. That day is coming.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 15:29

>>10
This... this actually makes some sense. I will delete my porn now and will work hard on limiting and eventually eliminating watching it.

Wish me luck, the struggle will be hard.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 15:37

>>11
It makes sense and it is also complete speculation, just like all of his ramblings.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 15:46

>>11,12
It ``makes sense'' in the sense that it's complete and obvious bullshit to anyone not desperate to believe in a global misandrist conspiracy. It's lunatic MRA drivel.

Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.
Frequent masturbation raises testosterone levels.

Meanwhile, women and teenaged girls are elevated to above-equal status via media propaganda and through legislation, diversity requirements in workplaces and higher education, etc.
How far do you have to have your head up your own ass to believe this?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 16:58

>>13
Do you watch TV?
Men are portrayed as idiots in the media, whereas women are shown that they can have their cake and eat it too.
This perfectly describes advertising in the UK.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 18:15

>>14
Do you understand what confirmation bias is?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 18:46

>>15
Do you understand what jew media is?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 19:08

>>15
I'm going to notice something out of the ordinary much more than something that isn't.
I suppose your omniscience and total impartiality allowed you to easily consider all things at once and quickly find that the phenomenon is significantly less pronounced than I believed.
If that's the case, then I yield.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 19:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 19:14

The ``patriarchy'' is still well and alive in third world countries such as Mexico, Saudi Arabia, or Utah. Enjoy a lack of civil liberties, shitstain.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 19:22

>>19
Take your fucking racism back to the 19th century where it belongs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 19:24

Total Rape Frenzy
The Video Game
PewDiePie?!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 21:09

total dubs frenzy
>>21
back to SomethingAwful, please

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 21:17

>>8
I guess you can't read.  It clearly says in the post that gender had been eliminated from their culture, so your ``women'' doesn't even make sense.

>>9
The egalitarian principle underlying liberalism, that everyone is equal, will no longer be able to be maintained, and the natural order of things will be restored.
The idea is that everyone has equal rights, not that they're literally pairwise identical in every possible way.  It's a matter of convention, much like civil rights.  Sure, stable societies can be freedom-less autocracies too, but I don't want to live there and neither do many people.

>>10
Pornography usage and frequent masturbation lowers the testosterone levels in men, and makes them more docile and complacent.
That's probably wrong, but even were it to be true, what's wrong with having less violent illogical macho douchebags in society?

and suddenly you have whole generations of young men and teenaged boys beta males who are unwilling to compete
First off, fuck off with the Greek letter shit.  Now, compete for what?  Socio-economic status?  Political power?  Women?  I suppose their gender role is to be the one working like an ass and bringing stuff in for their family (since they must have children), and the woman must stay at home.  Fuck you and your idiotic small-scale-natural-selection rabid-capitalism life-wasting idiocy.

>

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 21:40


>>23      >>23   >>23>>23   >>23     >>23        >>23     >>23>>23    >>23>>23>>23
  >>23  >>23   >>23    >>23 >>23     >>23      >>23>>23   >>23  >>23  >>23
   >>23>>23    >>23    >>23 >>23     >>23    >>23    >>23 >>23>>23    >>23>>23
     >>23      >>23    >>23 >>23     >>23    >>23>>23>>23 >>23 >>23   >>23>>23
     >>23      >>23    >>23 >>23     >>23    >>23    >>23 >>23   >>23 >>23
     >>23        >>23>>23      >>23>>23      >>23    >>23 >>23   >>23 >>23>>23>>23

>>23>>23>>23 >>23    >>23 >>23>>23>>23   >>23>>23       >>23      >>23      >>23     >>23>>23
>>23>>23>>23 >>23    >>23 >>23>>23>>23 >>23    >>23    >>23>>23>>23>>23   >>23>>23   >>23  >>23
    >>23     >>23>>23>>23     >>23       >>23          >>23  >>23  >>23 >>23    >>23 >>23   >>23
    >>23     >>23>>23>>23     >>23           >>23      >>23        >>23 >>23>>23>>23 >>23   >>23
    >>23     >>23    >>23 >>23>>23>>23 >>23    >>23    >>23        >>23 >>23    >>23 >>23  >>23
    >>23     >>23    >>23 >>23>>23>>23   >>23>>23      >>23        >>23 >>23    >>23 >>23>>23

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 22:20

                                                                                                                    >>24>>24>>24>>24                                                >>24       
                                                                                                            >>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24       
                                                                                                            >>24                >>24>>24>>24                                >>24>>24>>24       
>>24                                                >>24                                                >>24                        >>24>>24                            >>24    >>24>>24       
>>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24                        >>24>>24                        >>24        >>24>>24       
        >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                                            >>24>>24                        >>24        >>24>>24       
                >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                                    >>24                        >>24            >>24>>24       
                        >>24>>24>>24>>24                                    >>24>>24>>24>>24                                    >>24>>24                    >>24                >>24>>24       
                                >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                >>24                        >>24                >>24>>24       
                                >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                            >>24                        >>24                    >>24>>24       
                        >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                >>24                            >>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24
                >>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                    >>24                                                        >>24>>24       
    >>24>>24>>24>>24                                    >>24>>24>>24>>24                                        >>24                        >>24                                >>24>>24       
>>24>>24>>24                                        >>24>>24>>24                                            >>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24                                    >>24>>24       
>>24                                                >>24                                                >>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24>>24                                    >>24>>24       

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 22:43

>>13
Frequent masturbation raises testosterone levels.
Wrong! Peer-reviewed medical science shows that frequent masturbation lowers testosterone levels to as little as 30% of what's natural, and that abstaining from masturbation for as little as 7 days raises it back to normal. In other words, it went back up 150% from the frequent masturbation baseline.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659241
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788

You are spouting feminist lies!

This psychologist discusses how young men were cured of their melancholy and depression by abstaining from pornography and masturbation, thus achieving normal testosterone levels: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU

>>23
That's probably wrong, but even were it to be true, what's wrong with having less violent illogical macho douchebags in society?
Without real men protecting a society from mass immigration and subversion of wealth by violently overthrowing corrupt governments, the society enters full on collapse. Native birth rates plummet below replacement levels, and within a century or two, the people of the original society go extinct, subsumed into the most dominant cultures of the invading foreign immigrant populations. This is happening right now in all Western nations. Europeans are going extinct. In other words, you have bought your Women's Liberation movement by killing the near future society.

Leading demographers, sociologists, and other thinkers discuss the problem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxUD8E-qbyI

TL;DR - Feminists are suicidal and unwilling to accept the scientific facts when it doesn't agree with their politically correct views.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:02

>>26
Leave out the !s next time. Otherwise, 10/10, would hypothetically rage again (I didn't, actually, but could have).

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:03

>>26
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fractal_wrongness

You are spouting feminist lies!
Then why is it that feminists are now trying to ban pornography?

This psychologist discusses how young men were cured of their melancholy and depression by abstaining from pornography and masturbation, thus achieving normal testosterone levels
There's a difference between watching porn and being literally addicted to it.

Without real men protecting a society from mass immigration and subversion of wealth by violently overthrowing corrupt governments, the society enters full on collapse.
Excellent way to prove my point of gender being evil and destructive.  ``Real men don't care about presumption of innocence and due process of law, that's shit's for beta faggots.  We real men beat the fuck up out of everyone we want, yeah!''  Also, violence never solves anything; if history taught us anything, it's that at the end of a violent revolution, the new government is worse than the previous (because you have a bunch of illogical violent shitheads in power).

Native birth rates plummet below replacement levels, and within a century or two, the people of the original society go extinct, subsumed into the most dominant cultures of the invading foreign immigrant populations.
There's too many fucking people on this planet anyway.  That being said, immigration does become an issue if the immigrants aren't required to understand and respect the civil rights in the society they immigrate to (just look at illegal Sharia courts in the UK).

This is happening right now in all Western nations. Europeans are going extinct.
Waah waah our genes are better than those of those filthy immigrants, who cares if some are better-educated than us.

In other words, you have bought your Women's Liberation movement by killing the near future society.
Trading off civil rights for anything else is completely fucking unacceptable.

Feminists are suicidal and unwilling to accept the scientific facts when it doesn't agree with their politically correct views.
While I agree that political correctness should be destroyed with fire, you seem to be having a problem with not being able to control what other people are doing that doesn't concern you.  If every other white male in your society decides to get a vasectomy, there's nothing you can do about it because it's their fucking right.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:08

>>23
Now, I'll answer your other questions and arguments.

The idea is that everyone has equal rights, not that they're literally pairwise identical in every possible way. It's a matter of convention, much like civil rights.
The Universe only recognizes might. Might makes Right. Duty to one's ancestors and sacrifice for the future of your tribe, your community, and your nation are ultimately more important than rights. Rights are for self-entitled, selfish, narcissistic individuals who are too weak to defend or fight for what they believe in. The government, which grants you your so called rights, often ignores people's rights in a hypocritical fashion. There are many people in prison in various nations, their rights abused because they thought rights were something intrinsic that will always be there to protect them. They were sold a lie. You were sold a lie. When the economy continues to collapse, you will realize your rights won't save you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxtX_6dsq5I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H0guC-2q4U

Sure, stable societies can be freedom-less autocracies too, but I don't want to live there and neither do many people.
This is how the Universe works. If you don't like it, you can always kill yourself and give the rest of us some more living room.

Now, compete for what? Socio-economic status? Political power?  Women?  I suppose their gender role is to be the one working like an ass and bringing stuff in for their family (since they must have children), and the woman must stay at home. Fuck you and your idiotic small-scale-natural-selection rabid-capitalism life-wasting idiocy.

Compete for the right to exist. The right to carry on in a resource-constrained world. The victory of the stronger will over that of the weak. The amalgamation and concentration of power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVoCKLyt2uw&t=14m20

Why do you think that equality is axiomatic and morally good? Are you suggesting we should just hold hands in peace, living in our democratic globalist capitalist society, pointlessly consuming material goods and ensuring diversity and equality for everyone until the Universe wears down thermodynamically and can no longer support life? What will have been the point of it all?

Equality is tantamount to entropic death of civilization. It is suicidal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qL4HmwiVz0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_A3Lo7-qGA

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:21

>>29
Duty to one's ancestors and sacrifice for the future of your tribe, your community, and your nation are ultimately more important than rights.
Says who?  Sky-daddy?

Rights are for self-entitled, selfish, narcissistic individuals who are too weak to defend or fight for what they believe in. The government, which grants you your so called rights, often ignores people's rights in a hypocritical fashion.
I think you don't understand rights.  I am strong and what I fight for are my rights, for what I should be allowed to do simply because it is nobody else's business.  I wouldn't be fighting if all governments suddenly stopped violating people's rights.

This is how the Universe works. If you don't like it, you can always kill yourself and give the rest of us some more living room.
No, I can kill you (and the fucktards like yourself) and give myself more living room.

Compete for the right to exist. The right to carry on in a resource-constrained world. The victory of the stronger will over that of the weak. The amalgamation and concentration of power.
Sounds like someone built a time machine and brought a king/emperor/dictator from 1000 years ago.

Are you suggesting we should just hold hands in peace, living in our democratic globalist capitalist society, pointlessly consuming material goods and ensuring diversity and equality (in rights) for everyone until the Universe wears down thermodynamically and can no longer support life? What will have been the point of it all?
I highlighted the things I agree with.  Our sun will run out way before the Universe has its heat death; if you really want the survival of our species, you should be focusing about getting people to stop fighting and wasting their time over resources and work on space travel and colonization.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:22

>>28
Then why is it that feminists are now trying to ban pornography?
Because feminist women believe in the mythos of their little fantasy world of equal-rights. The believe they can have their cake and eat it too. They have been unable to see the objective effects of feminist policies on the western world, so what makes you think they are unable to see how pornography fits into that? They ignore the real science and truths that conflicts with their views, calling it as "sexist science," which falsely conflates it as a priori patriarchal discrimination against women--even though it's empirically true.

Women want to be in control of their own lives, but they believe they can force men to serve them. They think they can have their equal rights, and be able to force men to not have access to pornography, or video games, or macho movies. Do you not see the hypocrisy? They think that all video games must bend to the will of the feminist movement.

Modern third-wave feminism isn't about equality, it's about going against nature, about destroying society.

A female ex-feminist discusses this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:25

>>29
The universe doesn't recognize shit. People have cobbled justice and safety, wresting them away from the uncaring world time again, and even if there's any moment at which your shitty racist Sci-fi warlordism takes place, it will be replaced once more by solidarity and law.

Now go masturbate to ``High''-Fantasy book covers again.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:31

>>32
And by law/justice you mean rights enforcement, correct?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:34

>>30
Also, violence never solves anything; if history taught us anything, it's that at the end of a violent revolution, the new government is worse than the previous (because you have a bunch of illogical violent shitheads in power).

Try watching my videos, specifically the one of the Opiate of Peace. Peaceful protest never solves anything. Gandhi was only successful because his followers violently revolted against the British--thousands died.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quit_India_Movement

You haven't been providing sources or citations for your arguments, because, let's face it, you have no evidence to support your claims. All you have are eel-good appeals to emotion, leftist rhetoric and liberal talking-points.

Sounds like someone built a time machine and brought a king/emperor/dictator from 1000 years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwoQKt2vbNY

Today's liberal societies are a modern phenomenon and they will be short lived. No one can stop the collapse. Not even a bunch of liberal feel-good peace-lovers like yourself. You'll be holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" as the mobs of hungry plebeians storms your camp and butchers you for your meat. And if you don't thinking starving humans aren't capable of cannibalism, think again. Only the strong will survive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMwI5unlK9M
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism#Modern_era

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:39

>>33
Yes, by force if necessary. And overthrowing of tyrants, and resistance against the purveyors of violence.

No, it's not a contradiction, not anymore than it is to build a house from dirt, or fighting for peace. You think nobody would stand up against your shitty brand of fascism because anyone willing to do so would be on your side. Well, think twice.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:51

>>35
Yes, by force if necessary. And overthrowing of tyrants,
Sure, as long as force is used only as required, and that a fair trial is ensured.  Also, life is a right that only its owner may forfeit.

and resistance against the purveyors of violence.
Uh oh, here you're referring to condemning people who call to violence, not to banning cryptography and wiretapping everyone to really make sure nobody ever utters a sexist joke so that women everywhere may finally feel safe, right?

You think nobody would stand up against your shitty brand of fascism
Whoa whoa, I'm not >>31,34.  I agree with the rest of your post.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-29 23:56

>>35
This time around, no one will be able to finance an opposition to fascism. Peak oil has passed. The International bankers who brought America, Britain and the USSR to oppose Germany won't be able to play the same hat trick again.

Fascism/National Socialism are in harmony with nature. It is inevitable. Even now, Golden Dawn of Greece is growing, currently at 14% of popularity. By the time of the next election, it will be the second or perhaps even the most popular party. Other nationalist movements are rising up all across Western and Eastern Europe. In Italy. Spain. Ukraine just elected a National Socialist party. Serbia's recent election resulted in a coalition government between the National Socialists and the Right-wing Conservatives.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgVJVL94vM0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws99Z_j_PfM
http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_10_29/Ukrainian-Svoboda-Party-is-a-national-socialist-party-of-a-fascist-type-expert/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_parliamentary_election,_2012

YOU CAN'T STOP IT. THE TIDE RETURNS. DIE FLUT KOMMT!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUyDcGSMPEQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZG9NXmuCaE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kZOL7wQjfc

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-30 0:14

>>36
Also, life is a right that only its owner may forfeit.

I'd change 'may' with 'should', as I believe such rights only exist in so far as that the >>31,34 of the world are stopped from trampling them.

Uh oh, here you're referring to condemning people who call to violence, not to banning cryptography and wiretapping everyone to really make sure nobody ever utters a sexist joke so that women everywhere may finally feel safe, right?

Haven't thought about this a whole lot, but I have a vague notion that such things should be met with proportional force. Speech with speech, other forces with care, yes, if it comes to stop Benito here were his dream to come true, calls to arms with such, likewise with bullets. We can do it ourselves, no need to get the police, secret or otherwise, involved. It's fuzzy, I know, but I can't think of much else.

And it's what we're doing now.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-30 0:23

>>38
I'd change 'may' with 'should', as I believe such rights only exist in so far as that the >>31,34 of the world are stopped from trampling them.
The notable exception are immediate threats to one's life/health (e.g. self-defence) or that of others, of course.  If >>31,34 is about to shoot someone in the head and the only way you can stop that is by killing them, then it's okay.  Executing an imprisoned criminal is, however, not acceptable, since they are no longer an immediate threat.

Haven't thought about this a whole lot
You should.  The right to privacy, freedom of expression (with the usual call-to-violence exception), and the right to cryptography are very important, and it's important to realize that before you go on a crusade against Benito and start (oh the irony) revoking people's rights along the way.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-30 0:26

>>37
So over the top. But it's so beautiful to think that you're for real, Francisco, it just makes your trolling so much more enjoyable.

By the way, there's no Mussolini nor Hitler to support the propping up of fascist dictators on impoverished countries, so don't count on that.

¡No pasarán!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List