/prog/ - Asm pronounciation thread

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:30

al - 'all'

bl - 'bull'

cl - 'kill'

dl - 'dill'

ah - 'ahh'

bh - 'bush'

ch - 'ちゃ'

dh - 'ditch'

ax - 'axe'

bx - 'bix'

cx - 'kix'

dx - 'dicks'

si - 'sigh'

di - 'die'

bp - 'bip'

sp - 'sip'

eax - 'ayks' (rhymes with 'bikes')

ebx - 'ebbix'

ecx - 'ekkix'

edx - 'eddix'

esi - 'ezzie'

edi - 'eddie'

ebp - 'ebbup' (ebb-up)

esp - 'essp' (like 'esper')

aaa - 'ahhhhhh'

aad - 'ahhhhhd'

aam - 'ahhhhhm'

aas - 'ahhhhhs'

adc - 'addik'

arpl - 'arple'

bsf - 'bushef'

bsr - 'busher'

cbw - 'cub-wah'

cdq - 'kudduq'

clc - 'clic'

cld - 'clud'

cli - 'clee'

clts - 'clits'

cmc - 'cumk'

cmp - 'kump'

cpuid - 'koopid'

cwd - 'kwod'

daa - 'dah'

das - 'daas'

dec - 'deck'

inc - 'ink'

ja - 'yes'

jae - 'jay'

jb - 'jib'

jbe - 'jibby'

jc  - 'jick'

jcxz - 'jick-see'

jecxz - 'jeck-see'

je - 'jee'

jg - 'jig'

jge - 'jiggy'

jl - 'jill'

jle - 'jilly'

jmp - 'jimp'

jnc - 'jink'

jnz - 'jinzy'

jz  - 'jizz'

lahf - 'laugh'

lea - 'leah'

lgdt - 'luggit'

lidt - 'liddit'

lmsw - 'lumswah'

lodsb - 'lawds-bee'

lodsw - 'lawds-wah'

lodsd - 'lawds-dee'

mov - 'müv'

psrldq - 'psir-le-deq'

rcl - 'urkel'

rcr - 'urker'

rol - 'roll'

ror - 'roar'

rdmsr - 'urdmoser'

rdtsc - 'urdtusk'

repnz - 'rep-nen-zee'

repz - 'rep-zee'

rsm - 'ursem'

rsqrtps - 'ursquatpiss'

rsqrtss - 'ursquatsiss'

sahf - 'saahf'

shl - 'shill'

shr - 'sher'

sbb - 'shabab'

scasb - 'skaas-bee'

scasw - 'skass-wah'

scasd - 'skass-dee'

sgdt - 'sigidet'

shld - 'shilled'

shrd - 'shard'

sldt - 'silldet'

smsw - 'smumswah'

sqrtps - 'skirt-piss'

stc - 'stick'

std - 'stid'

sti - 'sty'

stmxcsr - 'stymix-cursor'

stosb - 'staws-bee'

stosw - 'staws-wah'

stosd - 'staws-dee'

unpckhpd - 'unpack-cupid'

xchg - 'zchiggig'

xor - 'zor'

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:48

unpckhpd - 'unpack-cupid'
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:54

You seem to be adding lots of vowels in unnecessary places.

I bet you'd pronounce "programming" as "porogoroamoiminga"

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:02

>>1
sqrtps - 'skirt-piss'
That's it, I lost it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:10

porogoroamoiminga

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:18

ausum pironounciatione tohroeadi

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 22:24

>>4
More like squirt-piss.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:08

If it ain't Lisp...

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:20

>>8
...it's usable?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:56



car - 'カール' 【ＰＩＧＧＵ語での自動車】

cdr - 'シーディーエール'

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 3:27

cmpxchg8b

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 3:35

>>11

cumpa-exjicub-bait

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 4:18

>>11
cumps-chigayb

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 4:29

>>11
- cee-em-pee-ecks-cee-eych-gee-eight-bee (faggot)

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-22 5:13

>>11
kump-zchegaiteb

Seriously, who doesn't mentally pronounce Asm mnemonics when reading through code?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 6:02

>>11
Compare and exchange eight bytes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 6:56

>>16 (faggot)

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-22 7:50

I just rewrote and finished a simple HTML parser in x86 Asm.

The C one I started on but didn't finish ended up at around 11KB.

The Asm one is less than 2KB.

Asm is pronounced 'awesome'.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 8:50

>>18
Fuck off already.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 9:59

>>18
I want to put my dick in your cudder, Cudder.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 14:31

>>18

Are you working on that low resource web browser now? I would join you but I think I would just bloat your beautiful code.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 15:30

You missed some:
verr
verw
sidt
lldt
ltr
str

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 16:33

>>21
If it's in x86 assembly, it can't be beautiful.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:08

>>20
Cudder doesn't have a cudder.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:49

>>24
Does Cudder have a car?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:57

cmp - 'camp'

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:25

>>18
C is indeed shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:55

>>25
Yes, you can suck on his car.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:56

>>24
You lie, everyone knows Cudder has a car+cdr.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 19:46

When this shit architecture finally dies, nobody will miss it except Mooly ``Fake Demo'' Eden, because there are no Hebrew pronunciations of MIPS mnemonics.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 22:07

>>16
This is the only right way of pronouncing acronyms.

All of you (faggot)s should fuck off back to slushloungeslush.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 1:06

>>14
Charlie Mike Papa Xray Charlie Hotel Golf Eight Bravo

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 3:43

Delta Uniform Bravo Zulu

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-23 4:16

>>21
I've been working on one for over a year now, in the little spare time I have.

>>23
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All the RISCs I've seen are boring and restricted.

>>30
x86 isn't going away any time soon. None of the popular RISCs can consistently beat it in terms of software support, code density, and IPC. I've mentioned this before, clockspeeds and caches have physical limits on how big they can get. Things like bloated fixed-width instructions may be fast to decode, but waste bus and memory bandwidth --- and that's where the bottleneck is. In contrast if your instruction decoder is wide enough then it does not need to be clocked at such a high speed as the ALU and other computational units and can do more stuff in parallel. The RISC model requires that everything go fast from the ALU to the RAM, with CISC (internally RISC-like) the CPU can run much faster without being starved by waiting for the memory.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:30

>>34
Are you going to buy a Lemote Yeeloong-8133?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:43

>>34
CISCs and RISCs are going to die in favor of glorious massively parallel dataflow architectures.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:48

>>36
Nah.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:53

>>37
You'll believe it to after the events of 7/27 happen. Just remember, it wasn't RISC like the media will say it was, it will have been the MPPA.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:04

>>38
This time its real. The looming Moores Law disaster is about to explode. We're mere months away from total collapse anyway. War is inevitable. They must liquidate the starving silicon engineers before they can revolt against their employers, and they will do that in an engineered Quake Live match.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:14

>>39
Exactly. That's what I've been saying. And its RISCs who run the Intels. They even admit they run the Intels. And AMDs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:19

>>39
Exactly. That's what I've been saying. And its the Jews who run the CPU industry. They even admit they run the CPU industry. And the Botnet.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-made-processor-responsible-for-40-of-intels-2011-sales/

Fassberg said that Intel Israel had hired some 7000 people in 2011 and planned to hire at least 6000 more in 2012. Fassberg added that Intel Israel employs nearly 80,000 workers directly, and is indirectly responsible, through suppliers and subsidiaries, for the employment of 223,000 heads of households — and altogether employs 75% of all workers in the electronics and software industry in Israel. Intel employs about 150,000 people worldwide. A special point of pride, she said, was that Intel Israel did not lay off any Jewish workers during the 2008-2009 economic downturn. “We had plans ready for all scenarios, including the collapse of Moores Law, but we were able to work things out to ensure that we did not have to lay off even one Jewish worker because of the recession,” she said. “And While Israel only fabricates 40% of our sales, the remainder is offshored to our Chinese slaves, and the profits are kicked back into purchasing up intellectual property and dominating in lawsuits,” she followed.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/06/obama-ordered-stuxnet-continued/

“We think there was a modification done by the Israelis,” an unidentified U.S. source reportedly told the president, “and we don’t know if we were part of that activity.” Vice President Joe Biden accused the Israelis of going “too far,” a source told Sanger. According to the Times, Obama wondered to advisers whether the attack should be discontinued after Stuxnet began spreading, believing the operation might have been irrevocably compromised. “Should we shut this thing down?” Obama reportedly asked at a meeting in the White House Situation Room that included Biden and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency at the time, Leon E. Panetta.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:20

>>40
Dude, you should have waited, I had this covered.

Name: >>40 2012-07-23 5:22

>>41-42
I'm sorry. Disregard my post, it is bad and I feel bad about it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:46

>>37-41
I love you, /prog/, I really do.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 18:36

>>41
Leave it to Jews to spin an obsolete architecture (it was obsolete when it was released in 1978, compared to the 68000) as the next great thing. The next thing you know, we'll all be worshiping some foreign tribal god and cutting off our foreskins...oh, wait.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-01 13:26

░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░▄██████░░░░░░░░░░░▀██░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░▐██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░███████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░
░░▐████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░
░░▐██████▌░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀▀▄░▀░▄▄▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░█▀▀███▀░░░░░░▄▀█▀░░░▐▄▄▄▌░░░░░░░░░
░░▐░▌▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▀░░░▌▀░▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░▌▐░░▌░░░░░░░░░░░▀░░░░▐░▐░░░░░░░░░░
░░░▐░▀▄▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌▌░▄▄░▐░▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░░▀█░▄▀░░░░░░░░░▐░▐▄▄▄▄▀▐░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▌▀░▐░░░░░░░░▄▀░░▀▀▀▀░▌░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▐░░░░░░░░░▌░░░▄▀▀▀▀▄▐░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▌░░░░░░░░░▐░░░░░▄▄░░▌░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░█▀▄░░░▐░▐░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░█░█░▀▀▄░▌░█░░░▀▀▄▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░▀▄░░▀▀▄▄█░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░░░▀▄░░░░▀▀▄▄▄▀▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▐░▌▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░▌░▐▌▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█░▐░▄▄▌░█▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█▌▐░▄▐░░▀▄▀▀▄▄░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░▐░░░▀▄░░░▀▀▄▄░░░░
░░░░░░░▀▄░▄▀█░░░░░█░░▌░░░░▀▄░░░░░█░░░

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-01 14:13

>>46
who are you quoting?

Asm pronounciation thread

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:30

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:48

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 20:54

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:02

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:10

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 21:18

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 22:24

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:08

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:20

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 23:56

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 3:27

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 3:35

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 4:18

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 4:29

15 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-22 5:13

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 6:02

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 6:56

18 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-22 7:50

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 8:50

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 9:59

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 14:31

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 15:30

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 16:33

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:08

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:49

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 17:57

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:25

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:55

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 18:56

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 19:46

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-22 22:07

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 1:06

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 3:43

34 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2012-07-23 4:16

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:30

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:43

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:48

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 4:53

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:04

40 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:14

41 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:19

42 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:20

43 Name: >>40 2012-07-23 5:22

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 5:46

45 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-23 18:36

46 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-01 13:26

47 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-01 14:13