/prog/ - C++ compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:02

Hello /prog/. What is the best C++ compiler? I am about to use either Borland or Dev C++. What is your opinion?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:15

0/10

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:33

if you are not trolling: intel c++ compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:58

What about CodeBlocks?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:12

What about LISP

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:18

>>3
if you are not trolling:
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 13:31

List Processing

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 14:22

The best is the Intel C++ Compiler (and yes, with a simple hack it can work just as well on AMD). Other good compilers are Visual C++ and clang.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:01

>>7
>>5
Oh i forgot that LISP is C++ compiler.

>>8
Visual is a crap. I like CB tho, whats good at Intel C++?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:04

>>9
Code Blocks is an IDE, not a compiler. Faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:07

>>10
Well it is both, dumbo

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:03

I didn't know there was an Intel C++ Compiler!

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:05

Anyone who says one compiler is better than others, explain why. Does it arrange instructions really cleverly or do something else that makes it different from other compilers?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:07

Explain the reasons why I am so much in pain!

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:08

clang, but specially because llvm

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:16

Objective Caml

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 18:43

Fun Fact: Intel's compiler includes a CPU dispatcher in all the code it produces that checks the manufacturer of the processor.
If it's not GenuineIntel, it doesn't even try to optimize the code. It just runs the most basic instruction branch.
I'm not even joking. Anyone who says AMD is inferior are most likely using Intel-compiled benchmarks.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:09

g++, end of thread

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:24

g++

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 21:43

>>17
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Intel_C%2B%2B_Compiler#Uncripple_icc_on_AMD_CPUs

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 3:08

>>20

horrifying. Although I wouldn't expect anything less than this.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:27

>>21
AMD is a third-world based company who make inferior, "knock-off" copies of American processor chips. They use child labor extensively in their third world sweatshops, and they deliberately disable the security features that American processor makers, such as Intel, use to prevent hacking.

Name: David Spencer 2012-07-18 4:44

>>22
BSD, Lunix, Debian and Mandrake are all versions of an illegal hacker operation system, invented by a Soviet computer hacker named Linyos Torovoltos, before the Russians lost the Cold War. It is based on a program called "xenix", which was written by Microsoft for the US government. These programs are used by hackers to break into other people's computer systems to steal credit card numbers. They may also be used to break into people's stereos to steal their music, using the "mp3" program. Torovoltos is a notorious hacker, responsible for writing many hacker programs, such as "telnet", which is used by hackers to connect to machines on the internet without using a telephone.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:51

>>22
citations and details please. And show that Intel doesn't do the same on the child labor, if your intent is to make Intel look better than AMD. But in any case, how would you justify a corporation using compiler crippling for vendor lock in?

Name: VIPPER 2012-07-18 5:27

>>24
Its a snippet of kopipe.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:03

>>11
It isn't! Idiot! It is an IDE. It supports interfacing with MinGW, Intel's compiler, etc.

Code::Blocks is NOT a compiler. It does no C or C++ compilation of any sort, whatsoever.

_{The more you know}

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

>>23
>>22
How do i hack a computer?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

>>26
You scum, download it then talk

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:41

>>28
Done. It's still not a compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 8:51

>>29
write, 'hello world' in it, and compile it, what do you have?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 10:04

>>30
A compiled program. Code::Blocks is not a compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 12:40

trolololololo lololo lololo

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 15:35

I like troll threads.
SAGE

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-19 23:44

I like troll breads.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 10:54

>34

>>>/b/ is that way

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:06

>>35
no its not u nose hazard

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:09

>>36
wat

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:14

>>37
dont mske my face laugh that hard you rude dude

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:33

PREPARE YOUR NOSTRIL

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:36

>>>>>39
FUCK YOU YOU ARE TICKLING M Y THROAT AND BRAIN LOL

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 15:48

god damnit, stop shitposting

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 17:07

>>41
babby's first /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 20:03

I love shitposting my anus.

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 19:37

wat

C++ compiler.

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:02

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:15

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:33

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:58

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:12

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:18

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 13:31

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 14:22

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:01

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:04

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:07

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:03

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:05

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:07

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:08

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 18:43

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:09

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:24

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 21:43

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 3:08

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:27

23 Name: David Spencer 2012-07-18 4:44

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:51

25 Name: VIPPER 2012-07-18 5:27

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:03

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:41

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 8:51

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 10:04

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 12:40

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 15:35

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-19 23:44

35 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 10:54

36 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:06

37 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:09

38 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:14

39 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:33

40 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:36

41 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 15:48

42 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 17:07

43 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 20:03

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 19:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:15

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 11:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 12:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 13:31

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 14:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 15:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 16:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 18:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 19:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-17 21:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 3:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:27

Name: David Spencer 2012-07-18 4:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 4:51

Name: VIPPER 2012-07-18 5:27

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:38

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 6:41

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 8:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 10:04

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 12:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-18 15:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-19 23:44

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 10:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:06

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:09

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:33

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 14:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 15:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 17:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-20 20:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-21 19:37