Languages should not be designed by committee. Especially if nobody on that committee knows how to implement them.
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-15 14:25
first line of code must start with (LISP
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-15 15:23
<%BLOCK DATA "MAIN" BEGIN%>
<%INTERNAL PRIVATE STATIC SIGNED NONVOLATILE INTERFACABLE CLASS DATA "Main" BEGIN%>
<%PRIVATE STATIC COMPUTABLE NONLOOP VOID SIGNED SUBPROCEDURE DATA "Main::Main" BEGIN%>
<%BEGIN NONBLOCKING INTERNAL PRIVATE SIGNED INSTANCE DATA "IO::PutLine"%>
<%USE INTERAL PRIVATE SIGNED STRING DATA "Enterprise Hello World!"/%>
<%/END NONBLOCKING INTERNAL PRIVATE SIGNED INSTANCE DATA "IO::PutLine"%>
<%/PRIVATE STATIC COMPUTABLE NONLOOP VOID SIGNED SUBPROCEDURE DATA "Main::Main"%>
<%/INTERNAL PRIVATE STATIC SIGNED NONVOLATILE INTERFACABLE CLASS DATA "Main" END%>
<%/BLOCK DATA "MAIN" END%>
I call it XML™-Enabled ASP.NET™-Bridged COBOL™ Enterprise™ Computing™ Interface™ Query-Extractor™ Language using Delphi Technologies™ provided by the Java™/Python™ Consortium
It's so ENTERPRISEy it gives me a raging rockhard boner just looking at it
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-15 16:31
>>18
no offsense dood but that joke is gettin a bit 0ld.
BUT ITS ENTERPRISE
YOU GODDAMN LISP/HAKSAL WEENIE
COMMUNIST FAGGOT NAZI BABY MURDER WHY DO YOU HATE FREEDOM
YOU FILTHY PIG DISGUSTING COMMUNIST OPENSOURCE NAZI ORPHAN RAPIST COCKMUGGLE
STOP HATING THE AMERICAN WAY OF PROGRAMMING AND EMBRACE THE ENTERPRISE IN YOU
Unfortunately, the lexer is not yet able to handle 2.8TB of data per project, so we'll have to enhance our "existing"™ (read: never existed, just got a new contract from oracle & IBM. hey, those doughnut enhancers don't write themselves) "technologies"™ (read: reusing existing COBOL mainframe. shit nigga, you thought we're going to actually write it from scratch? OUR ALMIGHTY AND LOVING, AMERICAN GOD IN HEAVEN GAVE US LEGACY CODE FOR A REASON) until the time is "ready"™ (read: compiles randomly)