Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I believe object-orientation is dated

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-06 2:07

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-12 22:31

>>116-120
Um, fuck, looks like I've been confined in my basement for a long time. I didn't know C11 was already supported by the mainstream compilers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 0:33

>>121
Don't feel too bad. C11 as a complete standard is supported almost nowhere (though Clang is becoming more and more viable, yay.) There are C11 features here and there, but MS's official line is "if you're not writing ANSI C, go find another compiler."

http://herbsutter.com/2012/05/03/reader-qa-what-about-vc-and-c99/

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 6:56

>>119
C11 is not C++11

>>120
While Clang is totally awesome, glibc is not. I should probably have clarified that. You can't reliably write C11 code and expect it to work anywhere except the most bleeding edge "I replaced my glibc with something actually good" people's machines. That and GCC is really far behind on the C11 support.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 7:15

>>34
No that doesn't work because | is taken fucking deal with it.

What if besides the setFavouriteMusician method there were setFavouriteFood and setFavouritePasstime functions that returned ints for example?

But the best bit is when you realise that maybe:
RacialStereotype nigra = new RacialStereotype("Lil Wayne", "watermelon an da fried chickenz", "smokin bluntx wif muh niggaz");
makes you look fucking retarded because it turns out your feature already exists.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 10:24

>>120
Clang implements all of C11 and is almost done with C++11 support.
That's just bullshit, they're not even close to implementing C11.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 16:50

>>123
You can't reliably write C11 code and expect it to work anywhere except the most bleeding edge "I replaced my glibc with something actually good" people's machines.
So my debian machine is probably fine then.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 19:41

>>124

You must be trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-13 20:34

>>124
I guess you don't know about operator overloading.

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 4:48

bampu pantsu

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List