I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>119
C11 is not C++11

>>120
While Clang is totally awesome, glibc is not. I should probably have clarified that. You can't reliably write C11 code and expect it to work anywhere except the most bleeding edge "I replaced my glibc with something actually good" people's machines. That and GCC is really far behind on the C11 support.