I believe object-orientation is dated

I don't know how many advances might be happening recently on some underground Smalltalk mailing-list, but in general, OOP has remained the same for decades.

Does everybody think it's good enough? Does nobody want new features that will make your code more expressive somehow? Watcha think?

>>118

Actually, a lot of C++11 features are supported by GCC, and in fact were supported before the standard was even finished. VC++ also supports a few things, I believe.