statically typed FIOC
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 3:05
dynamically typed languages all seem to require more testing than statically typed languages because of the....well...lack of static typing. Would it ever be possible to make languages like FIOC, Ruby, Lua, Perl, etc statically typed?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 4:14
No, because dynamic typing was invented for stupid people and thus the user bases of Ruby,Lua,Perl, etc could never learn into static typing...
3
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 4:21
If calling a function doesn't involve LEA
4
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 4:28
5
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 4:32
6
Name:
Anonymous 2012-04-27 4:33
>>4
Kill yourself pleb. It is Princess Lea, the most desirable woman in the Galaxy.
7
Name:
Cudder !MhMRSATORI!FBeUS42x4uM+kgp
2012-04-27 5:42
>>4
Leveraging Enterprise Architectures
8
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 10:25
Common lisp allows for both dynamic and static typing
9
Name:
Anonymous 2012-04-27 11:09
>>1
You can use static typing in perl
http://search.cpan.org/~doy/Moose-2.0403/lib/Moose/Manual/Types.pod#TYPES_IN_PERL ?
>>2
If you like your language to take your hand to cross the street, nice. I prefer a language that does not get in the way.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 11:24
>>9
TAKE MY HAND AND CROSS MY ANUS
11
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 13:47
>>10
TAKE MY DUBS AND COMPILE MY ANUS
12
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 15:33
Static typing in an interpreted language is like fapping with you'r hands tied behind ur'e back while you're Venus 2000 is furiously grinding away.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 15:44
Boo? Boo.
14
Name:
Anonymous 2012-04-27 16:09
Dynamic typing is shit.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-27 20:55
implying Python is dynamic typing
16
Name:
Anonymous
2012-04-29 2:47
>>13
Boo? Boo.
I forgot about Boo, that is a statically typed language with Python syntax.
I think UCSD Pascal was statically and dynamically typed
17
Name:
bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 4:39
bampu pantsu