>>19
Because whatever you do, DON'T go near the best functional languages as they will pollute your mind with ideas such as "C++ might not be the best language for everything ever" and "Maybe typeclasses are better than OOP in most cases".
Name:
Anonymous2012-04-30 5:35
>>23
lisp excellent semantics but a pure shit syntax. everything else (including haskell) is worse.
Name:
Anonymous2012-04-30 14:24
But Haskell is a compromise between C and Lisp for size and expressibility!
Name:
Anonymous2012-04-30 18:06
perl6 is definitively a great language, but they still have to release it as the "official version" (of course they need to finish some features first)
Name:
Anonymous2012-04-30 21:24
>>25
yes, C's expressiveness and Lisp's size and readability
Name:
Anonymous2012-04-30 23:25
Ruby. Because pure OOP and abuse of expressions is fun.