Why can't Linux be as easy as Windows
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 7:06
I guess you get what you pay for. UNIX is over 40 years old. They should just design a new OS entirely as a base system.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 7:18
They should just design a new OS entirely as a base system
3
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 7:27
Where's the package manager for windows?
4
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 7:32
>>3
Yeah, and women are inferior as sexual objects because they don't even have dicks!
5
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 7:35
>>4
Those that do have dicks are easier.
6
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 7:47
1/10 for making me laugh.
7
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:44
>>4
No, men are inferior as sexual objects because they have few holes, and a quite great refractory period.
8
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:50
18+Be a masochist, so you can fuck until your penis starts to hurt, then you get a never-ending boner.
9
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 10:44
>>8
This sounds like a bug. You should report it.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 11:03
Linux is a lot easier than Windows, especially if you want to set up a programming environment.
11
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 11:17
>>10
I just
want a visual interface AND a comfy command line AND good documentation. Is this too much to ask?
12
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 11:27
>>11
Yes it is. Look at how crappy both Windows and Linux are.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 12:48
>macfag detected
14
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 13:39
There are better OSes like VMS, i5/OS, Multics, Genera, Inferno and EROS but they either only run on machines that cost more than ten thousand dollars, haven't been developed in 20 years, or are research OSes that have no programs other than the ones that come with the OS.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 13:56
>>14
Lisp is shit, VMS and Multics are horrible, Inferno had a shitty language and EROS is just shit.
16
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 17:47
>>11
Just use GNU/Linux.
visual interface
KDE.
comfy command line
Included.
documentation
info,
man and whatever else a specific package includes. At least it's better than Windows'.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 18:33
Linux is user friendly, just not idiot friendly.
18
Name:
Anonymous 2012-02-09 18:55
>>17
I'd like to interject... I'll show myself out.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 20:24
>>18
In that case, Linux is not user friendly. That doesn't change the fact that GNU/Linux based systems are user friendly.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 22:57
Linux is shit.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-09 23:28
>>20
If it ain't Linux, it's crap.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-10 2:12
>>21
If it ain't Linux, it's Windows, Mac OSX, *BSD, or any other number of non-Linux operating systems.
23
Name:
OP IS A !FAG
2012-02-10 2:48
>>11
Sounds like you want OpenBSD.
>>2
I fucking love Plan 9. I wish I were actually competent at using it though.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-10 5:12
If you ain't shovin' snails up your nose, you got ants in your pants, my fellow silly sausages.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-10 5:54
26
Name:
Anonymous
2012-02-10 13:44
If ya ain't crackers, you're nuts.