Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Higher level vs low level

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:22

i want to learn to code so i can hack but i dont know how to program yet, should i learn c frst cuz its a lower lvl lang dont think im ready for higher lvl langs yet, what does /prog/ think

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:23

2/10

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:23

u shud lrn them all cuz u c its knowlege and shit i dunno

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:26

>>3
but dats gunna take to long lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:58

You should learn English first.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 12:18

>>5
Listen to this man, for he speaks (types?) the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 13:23

I couldn't read it ALTHOUGH he put in spaces!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 15:51

>>5
your so fucking funny bro ill fuck you up in real life you nerd

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:02

lrn2bbcode 1st u duoble nigger

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:04

I can't believe what a fucking faggot you are. It truely defies believe and all imagination. Unbelivable. Too Crazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:09

>>8
What about my fucking funny bro?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:54

>>11
His fucking funny.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 3:06

You fucking jewish niggers are fucking with the wrong fucking guy

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 5:45

Those with short ones are rough, and those with long ones are carefree.
— Reisen U. Inaba.

It means that people using low-level languages have small ones.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:34

>>14
yeah mate but she was talking about ears

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 20:20

>>14
Assembler languages were invented by americans.

The same kind of gun-toting americans who driver hummers.

Go figure.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 20:38

>>17
Americans invented Lisp, Forth and Smalltalk
Europeans invented Algol, Pascal and C++
Asians invented monkeycoding

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:22

>>18
Apart from smalltalk, americans seem unable to invent any useful programming language.

Forth = abstract bullshite
Lisp = autismal bullshite
Java = bloated (also slow as fuck) bullshite
visualbasic = retarded bullshite
c# = pretentious bullshite
javascript = java for idiots
xul = because XML was clearly not obfuscated enough yet
cobol = because fuck usability
fortran = because math is the greatest thing ever, rite guiz?
rexx = because it's so difficult to decide whether to use a scriptinglanguage or a systemlanguage. so the most logical step would be to merge both, rite?
batch script = just who the fuck needs subroutines anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:29

>>19
also, hilarious anecdote follows.

When C++ folks say "C/C++" instead of just "C++", all the C autists blubber C++ IS AN ABOMINATION! HOW DARE YOU TO NAME IT IN THE SAME SENTENCE AS THE HOLY GODGIVEN RELIQUE THAT IS WELLKNOWN UPON HUMANKIND AS "C"!!!111oneone.

But as soon as C++ folks say that C++ is better than C (which is a wellknown fact), all the C autists have an autism seizure and scream OHMAIGOD BUT C++ IS JUST C WITH CLASSES HERPDERPDERP.


Oh and the hilarious part about it? C was invented by 'murrikans, while C++ was invented by europeans.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:37

You silly Earthanoids never cease to amuse.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:57

doubles ecks dee

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 22:16

>>19
nothing about this post is right. I sincerely hope you are trolling, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 22:20

>>20
>C++ is better than C (which is a wellknown fact)
*facepalm*
there are LOTS of reasons to use C over C++. The fact that the design of C++ is [b][i]retarded[i][b] (http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/) is the least of them, because at least you can (and should) ignore almost every feature of the language.

But the fact is, there are only a handful of C++ compilers and there probably won't ever be more because the language standard is too retarded and complex. So you need C for embedded systems.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:28

>>20
Saying C/C++ we also mean Java and C#.

C was invented by 'murrikans, while C++ was invented by europeans.
Nope. Both are based on Algol and have no original ideas.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:39

Good low-level languages: Assembly, C, Forth.
Good high-level languages: Common Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:58

>>26
C
C stands for [C]rap.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:59

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLISS
was much better than C/C++ and had no stupid type system.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:02

>>28
Also, love
keywords such as EQL for equality (as opposed to overloading the = symbol for the same purpose), GTR for Greater Than, and NEQ for not equal.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:04

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:15

>overloading the = symbol
In Soviet Pascal, EQL overloads you.
x:=y

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:30

>>29
GTR for Greater Than, and NEQ for not equal
fucking disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:59

>>32
Enjoy your Haskell, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 8:17

>>33

ge le gt lt eq are the best.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 8:43

>>23
why should i be trolling? apart from you being painfully obviously analfrustrated, i see nothing wrong about it

now please be a 'murrikan inbred somewhere else

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 9:43

>>33
Enjoy your lack of syntax and illegible code, lithpfag.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 9:45

>>36
Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax...
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.

...

Syntax is an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 10:08

>>37
Parentheses are an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 14:02

>>38
forms that don't start with a symbol describing how to interpret the rest of the form are an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 14:29

[spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup][spoiler][sup]o[spoiler][sub][spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup][spoiler][sup]o[spoiler][sub][spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup]olololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololollolololololololololololololololololololololololoolololololololololololololololo[/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler]

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 14:56

>>40
Well, you almost got it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 16:33

>>39
LITHPu is an eyesore.
now go back to your hugbox, and stop backtalking, you fucking brat.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 16:47

>>40
That kinda made my browser hang. Your code is disgusting and hideous, but you are well on your way to becoming an EXPERT 'BBCODE' PROGRAMMER

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 18:17

higher level concepts like FP and math are much more transferable than lower level stuff. low level knowledge is much more domain specific to the platform youre working on and abstractions (compilers, vms) are getting so good that you dont have to think about them as much. you should still be able to write good, clean code in C and know the important unix system calls and how they work but they are becoming less and less important.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List