Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Higher level vs low level

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:22

i want to learn to code so i can hack but i dont know how to program yet, should i learn c frst cuz its a lower lvl lang dont think im ready for higher lvl langs yet, what does /prog/ think

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:23

2/10

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:23

u shud lrn them all cuz u c its knowlege and shit i dunno

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:26

>>3
but dats gunna take to long lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 11:58

You should learn English first.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 12:18

>>5
Listen to this man, for he speaks (types?) the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 13:23

I couldn't read it ALTHOUGH he put in spaces!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 15:51

>>5
your so fucking funny bro ill fuck you up in real life you nerd

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:02

lrn2bbcode 1st u duoble nigger

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:04

I can't believe what a fucking faggot you are. It truely defies believe and all imagination. Unbelivable. Too Crazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:09

>>8
What about my fucking funny bro?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-19 16:54

>>11
His fucking funny.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 3:06

You fucking jewish niggers are fucking with the wrong fucking guy

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 5:45

“Those with short ones are rough, and those with long ones are carefree.”
— Reisen U. Inaba.

It means that people using low-level languages have small ones.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:19

>>10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8g-iYGHpEA

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:34

>>14
yeah mate but she was talking about ears

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 20:20

>>14
Assembler languages were invented by americans.

The same kind of gun-toting americans who driver hummers.

Go figure.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 20:38

>>17
Americans invented Lisp, Forth and Smalltalk
Europeans invented Algol, Pascal and C++
Asians invented monkeycoding

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:22

>>18
Apart from smalltalk, americans seem unable to invent any useful programming language.

Forth = abstract bullshite
Lisp = autismal bullshite
Java = bloated (also slow as fuck) bullshite
visualbasic = retarded bullshite
c# = pretentious bullshite
javascript = java for idiots
xul = because XML was clearly not obfuscated enough yet
cobol = because fuck usability
fortran = because math is the greatest thing ever, rite guiz?
rexx = because it's so difficult to decide whether to use a scriptinglanguage or a systemlanguage. so the most logical step would be to merge both, rite?
batch script = just who the fuck needs subroutines anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:29

>>19
also, hilarious anecdote follows.

When C++ folks say "C/C++" instead of just "C++", all the C autists blubber C++ IS AN ABOMINATION! HOW DARE YOU TO NAME IT IN THE SAME SENTENCE AS THE HOLY GODGIVEN RELIQUE THAT IS WELLKNOWN UPON HUMANKIND AS "C"!!!111oneone.

But as soon as C++ folks say that C++ is better than C (which is a wellknown fact), all the C autists have an autism seizure and scream OHMAIGOD BUT C++ IS JUST C WITH CLASSES HERPDERPDERP.


Oh and the hilarious part about it? C was invented by 'murrikans, while C++ was invented by europeans.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:37

You silly Earthanoids never cease to amuse.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 21:57

doubles ecks dee

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 22:16

>>19
nothing about this post is right. I sincerely hope you are trolling, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 22:20

>>20
>C++ is better than C (which is a wellknown fact)
*facepalm*
there are LOTS of reasons to use C over C++. The fact that the design of C++ is [b][i]retarded[i][b] (http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/) is the least of them, because at least you can (and should) ignore almost every feature of the language.

But the fact is, there are only a handful of C++ compilers and there probably won't ever be more because the language standard is too retarded and complex. So you need C for embedded systems.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:28

>>20
Saying C/C++ we also mean Java and C#.

C was invented by 'murrikans, while C++ was invented by europeans.
Nope. Both are based on Algol and have no original ideas.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:39

Good low-level languages: Assembly, C, Forth.
Good high-level languages: Common Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:58

>>26
C
C stands for [C]rap.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 6:59

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLISS
was much better than C/C++ and had no stupid type system.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:02

>>28
Also, love
keywords such as EQL for equality (as opposed to overloading the = symbol for the same purpose), GTR for Greater Than, and NEQ for not equal.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:04

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:15

>overloading the = symbol
In Soviet Pascal, EQL overloads you.
x:=y

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:30

>>29
GTR for Greater Than, and NEQ for not equal
fucking disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 7:59

>>32
Enjoy your Haskell, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 8:17

>>33

ge le gt lt eq are the best.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 8:43

>>23
why should i be trolling? apart from you being painfully obviously analfrustrated, i see nothing wrong about it

now please be a 'murrikan inbred somewhere else

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 9:43

>>33
Enjoy your lack of syntax and illegible code, lithpfag.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 9:45

>>36
Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax. Syntax...
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
Syntax.
...

Syntax is an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 10:08

>>37
Parentheses are an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 14:02

>>38
forms that don't start with a symbol describing how to interpret the rest of the form are an eyesore.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-21 14:29

[spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup][spoiler][sup]o[spoiler][sub][spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup][spoiler][sup]o[spoiler][sub][spoiler][sub]l[spoiler][sup]olololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololollolololololololololololololololololololololololoolololololololololololololololo[/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler][/sub][/spoiler][/sup][/spoiler]
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -