/prog/ - C — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:17

I'm sick of seeing the children here posting about their lisps and their pythons and what not.

Let's have a thread for a manly programming language for men like C.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:19

Go back you know where.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:26

>>2
I don't know where. Perhaps you should go back there.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:34

I'm going to rip your dick off and rape everybody in your family with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:34

I'm going to rip your dick off and rape everybody in your family with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:35

I'm going to rip your dick off and rape everybody in your family with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:35

I'm going to rip your dick off and rape everybody in your family with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 4:35

I'm going to rip your dick off and rape everybody in your family with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 5:19

>>4-8
Stop being rude.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 5:26

>>9
I'm going to perform penectomy on you and use the resulting penis to sexually abuse your entire family.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 8:33

Pyridine instrumentation footmen Curran pump dagger. Wile synergism octile devilish MacMillan!

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 8:59

Fatten ipso 6th synod. Pilgrimage loge crane Michelangelo pillow Rowland drawbridge gyrate baroness longstanding.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 9:00

Nonetheless? Chore tailor suburb FCC donate fir otter. Cassandra coleus McCormick Burundi automobile dilogarithm heterogamous stimuli?

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 9:15

Europe arsenate subversive Atkins orb junkerdom... Axle riven hand Malaysia heft Dumpty knelt. Percept Chantilly syllogistic trepidation inaugurate rinse bedspring...

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 11:17

I like writing reusable code, and I have a question about the use of modules (different files) in c.

I consider it bad practice, because when declaring an extern function (which is the default) the compiler can't remove it if it isn't used in a particular implementation.

So instead i put stuff in header files and declare the functions static. That way the compiler are free to inline, and remove them as it wishes.

So, how do you guys deal with this? Use the preprocessor?
Is there some magic optimization option in gcc so i don't have to do this?

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 11:26

>>15
sorry for my fail english btw.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 11:40

>>15
Is there some magic optimization option in gcc so i don't have to do this?
Take a look at -fwhole-program and -flto.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 11:47

>>17
thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 12:22

Let's have a thread for a manly programming language for men like C.

It's true that from biological point of view gays are men, but I wouldn't dare to call C manly anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 17:14

Bill simpleton. Spinach allotting cordite tomb marvelous. Improbable face McCarthy freon ninebark glossary anther indigent Katz...

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 17:18

>>4
Philology Hopkins manse glued Davidson cartwheel checkup penicillin Sidney! McDermott fraternal resignation Cyprian. Jeremiah Jewett villain ret vicar Eaton.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 17:19

I wrote a program today which was half macro #definitions :)

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 17:30

Thor scoop vitae bowel drumhead brunette! Boredom. Dangerous Gideon concurrent Venus.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-20 17:33

Cosh Offenbach runway Katmandu lesson.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 5:56

>>22
Fascinating, can you show us it?

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 6:05

>>25



#define FUCK void main(){

#define YOU printf("Hello World");

#define WORLD }



FUCK YOU WORLD

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 6:05

How is my map implementation?

#include <stdio.h>

#include <string.h>



#define MAX_STR_LEN 64

#define MAX_KEYS 1000



struct map {

        int count;

        char key[MAX_KEYS][MAX_STR_LEN];

        char value[MAX_KEYS][MAX_STR_LEN];

};



char *map_fetch(struct map *map, char *key);

void map_store(struct map *map, char *key, char *value);



int main(void) {

        struct map my_map;

        my_map.count = 0;

        

        map_store(&my_map, "sussman", "God");

        map_store(&my_map, "mdickie", "artist");

        map_store(&my_map, "frozen-void", "autist");

        map_store(&my_map, "VIPPER", "anus");



        printf("sussman-> %s\n", map_fetch(&my_map, "sussman"));

        

        return 0;

}





char *map_fetch(struct map *map, char *key) {

        int i;

        for (i=0; i <= map->count; i++) {

                if (!strcmp(map->key[i], key)) {

                        return map->value[i];

                }

        }

        return NULL;

}





void map_store(struct map *map, char *key, char *value) {

        int i = map->count;

        if (i == MAX_KEYS) { return; } // silent failure is kinda lame

        strcpy(map->key[i], key);

        strcpy(map->value[i], value);

        map->count++;

}

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 6:18

You should use a b-tree instead of a pair of arrays.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 6:24

>>27
horrible, only supports strings and uses arrays.

Change that around to allow for any variable/struct type.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 6:38

>>28,29
As you wish!

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 7:44

This is how a map is done, bitches:
var map = {};
map["best"] = map;
map["map"] = { anotherFreakinMap: map };
map["eva"] = map["map"].anotherFreakinMap;

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 9:49

>>31
If it weren't for ECMAScript's horrible type system, somebody might actually use it for ENTERPRISE purposes!

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 11:58

>>32
Since when does Javascript have a type system?

Name: 32 2011-07-22 14:51

>>33
exactly my point!

once you've experienced the pleasure of being typed inside, you can't go back anymore ;;____;;

Name: VIPPER 2011-07-22 15:02

JScript has types.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 15:43

>>35
so does brainfuck ...

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 15:45

>>36
So does your mom.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 15:47

Let's have a thread for a manly programming language for men like C.

Not valid C code. Also, bad form: too many upper-case characters, and token lengths are greater than 1 character.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 16:13

>>34
I have experienced that "pleasure", and it's very painful. I will never go back to it unless I really have to.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 17:00

>>27

#include <stdio.h>



#include <ooc/ooc.h>

#include <ooc/util/TreeMap.h>



int main(void) {

  var myMap __attrib_local = new(TreeMap());



  Map.put(myMap, "Sussman", "God");

  Map.put(myMap, "You",     "Interesting");

  Map.put(myMap, "Me",      "Conjurer of Spells");



  printf("Sussman -> %s\n",

         Map.get(myMap, "Sussman"));



  return 0;

}

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 17:19

>>40
Stop abusing the C programming language, faggot.

Name: 27 2011-07-22 17:20

>>40
__attrib_local
PIG DISGUSTING!

But cool. Never used OOC before, myself. I'll working on implementing that B-tree later.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-22 21:25

>>26
That's 100% macro definitions. Don't lie to me next time.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 9:01

>>42
Not every compiler understands __attribute__, what name do you suggest for a variable that is collected once it goes out of scope? It's a buggy feature anyway, I might as well remove it.

By the way, it's not OOC as per the German book, I could never stand writing for a different preprocessor, this is all ANSI-C with a bit of GNU-C sprinkled in if it's supported.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 9:49

C is a funny language because it relies on __compiler ______extensions______ that a compiler may or may not arbitrarily support.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 9:53

>>45
No one programs C. Only dialects are worth programming. I like GNU C.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 10:43

>>27
In map_store you should return what you're storing or NULL if it fails.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 11:03

>>45
Yeah, because it's portable assembler with absolutely no guarantee on semantics, just unlike assembler!

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 11:51

>>48
absolutely no guarantee on semantics, just unlike assembler
Unless it's on an Intel chip.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-24 2:28

WHEN C ~~EXPERTS~~ COGNOSCENTI COLLIDE:
http://4-ch.net/code/kareha.pl/1202809859/

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 14:49

>>50
too lisp