best IDE and implementation for sicp

gnu emacs and mit scheme?

no

Why would you use emacs and not vim?

>>3
Why would you believe that gnu emacs and mit scheme constitutes an IDE?

I really don't like EMACS. Alt-Meta-Shift-Bucky-Bucky-One is just not a user interface.

>>4
>implying vim is an ide

you must be new here

>>3 >>6
Arguing over semantic bullshit. DE.

>>6
No, vim in itself isn't an IDE. People that think it is clearly have never written a single line of production level code in their entire lives.

>>7
Have you ever been subjected to use some bullshit IDE like Netbeans out in the workforce? Given your idiotic response, I bet you haven't. The point being, it's not some kind of semantic bullshit. Now fuck off and go back to playing with your sister's barbie dolls.

>>8
No, vim in itself isn't an IDE.
Agree.

People that think it is clearly have never written a single line of production level code in their entire lives.
Not so much. People treat it like one because with scripts it can in fact serve as an IDE by any reasonable definition. I prefer it to most standalone IDEs for the simple fact that I can decide how much and what kind of integration I want.

>>9
Baah. I prefer a nonfacist editor where I can control my indentation, a real debugger that doesn't bork under the pressure of hostile code, and a set of decent makefile rules.

>>10
That's cool. No idea what those complaints have to do with vim though.

You should really use emacs.

>>12
It's a pretty good operating system, but it could use a better text editor.

>>9,10
Integrated development environment
Think about it.

INTEGRATEDLY DEVELOP MY ANUS ENVIRONMENT

>>13
Great come back.