Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

HACKER or CODE MONKEY

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:28

Are you a HACKER or CODE MONKEY!?

HACKERS use C, Lisp, and Perl.
CODE MONKEYS use C++, Python, and Java.

HACKERS use emacs and vi.
CODE MONKEYS use Notepad++, Eclipse, VS, and XCode.

But BOTH are better than WEB DEVELOPERS, because WEB DEVELOPERS use PHP and Notepad!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:42

I use Perl and PSPad. What am I?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:43

I use Lisp and Forth and I'm a Satori programmer, none of this hakka code monkey shit. Please, back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:46

Lisp, C, platform's assembly. Other languages as needed.
Emacs and a few other editors as needed.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:00

Well, I flip between Vi and TextMate for text editors, and use C, C++, Objective C and Ruby as my programming languages. What does this make me?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:01

>>5
Hipster.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:13

I use C, perl, javascript and vi, I am also a "web developer"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:03

>>7
As long as you are not exclusively a web developer, you're fine.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:05

HACKERS use Lisp
CODE MONKEYS use C, Python or Java

HACKERS use emacs.
CODE MONKEYS use vim.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:31

You're all idiots. The difference between a hacker and a code monkey is the nature of his employment.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:34

>>10
Which of the one thousand definitions of ``hacker''?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:37

NEURO-TYPICALS: Windows, Visual Studio, C++, C#, VB
AUTISTS: Everything else

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:46

>>12
NEURO-TYPICALS: Windows, Visual Studio, C++, C#, VB
Weird way to say ``little kids''.
AUTISTS: Everything else
Weird way to say ``normal people''.

Name: TIQ 2011-05-19 0:33

>>1

noob.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:29

I use DrRacket. It seems I reached satori so you cannot confine me to your mortal shacklescategories.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 12:42

Am I a web developer if I write server code in C++?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 12:59

>>16
You allow them to exist so you are some kind of a web developer father.

Name: VIPPER 2011-05-19 14:04

I have seen the movie ``Hackers'' 135 times now and i will keep watching it. I hope this answers your question.

Also im a lisp weenie.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 7:11

im a ninja

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 7:24

I use C, Javascript and Perl.
Also, vim/gvim and a certain Wordstar clone.

Sad: ed requires a capable terminal. I found out the hard way it's worthless for proxy connections that bust your tty.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 8:15

>>20
ed requires a capable terminal.
Works on a dumb terminal for me.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 9:21

>>21
Do you realize the point of a dumb terminal is to be a capable terminal, no more no less? vim probably works just fine on your dumb terminal too.

Name: UMH memesmith !gNlkr4vCuc 2011-05-20 10:00

>>20
Okay what the fuck is your connection doing to your tty that fucks up ordinary stdin/stdout with no cursor-positioning bullshit. I didn't fucking believe such a piece of shit existed but it looks like you're about to fucking prove me wrong. Are you fucking prepared to go ALL THE WAY with your fucked up shitty evidence? There will be dire consequences, should you fail.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 10:47

>>23
Yeah, it's not rocket surgery. Try this: ssh localhost /bin/sh, authenticate and see how usable your terminal is. Now, try this instead: ssh -t localhost /bin/sh.

Big difference. I admin a bunch of boxes that must be connected to via some kind of ssh proxy that seems to invoke the shell as a command, but doesn't indicate it wants a tty.

Long story short: your incredulity puts you in the same class as the genius who setup the broken proxy in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 14:08

>>20

I've been able to use ed using a screen reader that simply reads lines from ed's output and reads them out loud. I'm not sure if that qualifies for a dumb terminal though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 14:10

>>24
rocket surgery
what

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 15:00

>>25
Perhaps your ed is different than the one installed on these boxes, or perhaps your reader emulates a terminal (more likely, most commands that benefit from a terminal in any way simply assume they have one.) I'm not very well versed in ed and I wouldn't have bothered using it except for solving this particular problem, but it doesn't work there either.

>>26
It's an expression.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 15:48

>>27
Its a mixed metaphor

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 16:11

I mostly use C, but I do use C++ sometimes when I don't feel like rewriting something that's implemented nicely in boost.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 20:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 21:58

>>27

I see. It seems so strange to me that ed wouldn't work on a dumb terminal, as it doesn't seem to do anything fancy. It would be a pretty short exercise to write an implementation of ed in a scripting language like perl, so I suppose anyone willing to do so could find a version compatible with a dumb terminal or write one his/herself.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 22:40

>>31
It does work on a dumb terminal. I'm talking about a situation where you don't even have something that qualifies as any kind of terminal.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-21 0:12

>>32

my bad. I don't have the best reading comprehension.

I guess you wouldn't be able to use any program that wasn't completely autonomous in that case then.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List