>>11
ANUS COLLECTORS have [u]p[b]o[o]or[u] [/o]scalability[/b].
Nope. Today OS' memory model make them so. Low-level garbage collection would be much more efficient than manual memory management.
qsort and functions pointers would like to have a word with you.
First-class functions != function pointers.
*insert shitty struct magic here*
>>1 is wrong here. Still, it's painful (GObject, anyone?), and it's not Smalltalk's message passing nor CLOS.
Bullshit.
Enjoy the buggy stdlib.
At least it's not FIOC.
Good point. But being better than FIOC is not a great achievement either.
>>13
Why? Because
omgzzz xD real menz manage memory manually lol? If so, get out, you're
not good with computers.