Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

buzzwords

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:26

Hey /prog/

What's this ``dynamic programming'' I keep hearing about?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:27

mailto:noko
reported

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:28

It's programming 101.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:38

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming

Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

noko every day

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:30

>>4
What does that mean?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:35

>>6
Read your SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:42

Evidently it means ``recursion''.

The word dynamic was chosen by Bellman to capture the time-varying aspect of the problems, and also because it sounded impressive.[3] The word programming referred to the use of the method to find an optimal program, in the sense of a military schedule for training or logistics. This usage is the same as that in the phrases linear programming and mathematical programming, a synonym for optimization.[4]

Name: 2011-02-25 22:49

Read your CLRS

Abstractly you just bread down a problem into states and express some calculation in terms of calculations of smaller states (yes, similar to recursion).  You then just calculate from the smaller states to the larger states to perform the calculation on all states.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:59

Dynamic Programming is a jewish pseudo-science based on jewish set theory. You wont need it in practice, because in real life there're no infinities and sets, dynamic programming is based.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:03

>>8
And there is no "time" or "speed", because ther are no cartesian distances, just cellular automatoes, that create a bunch of hypotheses, one which is our reality.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:13

>>10

Yeah just keep calculating the fibonacci numbers in exponential time

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:23

>>12
fibs have nothing to do with set theory, jew.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:29

>>13

'fibs' definitely has something to do with dp, however

OP: Try reading http://www.topcoder.com/tc?d1=tutorials&d2=dynProg&module=Static for a tutorial on the matter

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:35

>>14
I already heard same shit about Lisp: that Lisp is math, because its `lambda` keyword is named after some non-existing set theoretic entity, nobody cares about. So either you show us your "infinite set" or goto osvencim, jew. And stop fucking people's brains!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:49

>>15
You could just go back to /sci/ or /sci/. The only one who cares about jews here is VIPPER.

Name: VIPPAR 2011-02-26 0:03

JAWS

Name: VIPP∀R 2011-02-26 0:05

J∀WS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:22

>>16
If you accept Set Theory (a jewish invention), then you care. And most people on /prog/ accept Set Theory. Dynamic Programming is based on Graph Theory, which is part of Jewish Set theory. So I'm in right place.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:24

Cantor Cranks on my /prague/?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

>>19
I solemnly refuse to have bitch tits.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

>>19
Dynamic Programming is based on Graph Theory
Meaning you wont be allowed to work in Graph Theory, without using Set Theory. If you try inventing your own theory, you will be quickly marked as a dissident and expelled from university. This is the way jews deals with their enemies.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:28

>>20
You will become famous if you please famous people -- and all famous mathematicians like axiomatic set theory. -- Paul Lorenzen

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:05

>>22,23
Okay, now I know IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:10

>>24
Just remember, you cant do anything without jewish consent.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:35

>>25
Fuck off, ``nazist''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:47

>>25
Siegh heil, ``mein fuhrer''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:56

>>26
You say "nazist" like it something bad. They were smart people, who tried to free their home and ideals from jewish infection. If not for them, Germany would probably became infected with jewish communism, a defective ideology, with roots in ugly jewish religion. Alas they were defeated by jews and their communism.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:03

>>28
get the fuck out already

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:04

>>29
I don't take orders from jewish maggots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:19

>>30
You know you can't troll people who don't know shit about that, right? The /sci/ guys masturbate over infinity and that jewish stuff, we used to masturbate over SICP and The Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:26

>>31
I'm not trolling. I'm dead serious. If you graduated from any university with CS degree, then you know what set theory is, and what it leads to.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:38

>>32
In my country we don't even have CS. We call it Informatics and study Jewa and SCALABLE ENTERPRISE DESIGN PATTERNS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:48

>>33
Informatics includes Set Theory, as basis.

>and study Jewa and SCALABLE ENTERPRISE DESIGN PATTERNS.
The problem with Java isnt that it "enterprise", but that it is based on type-theory, which itself based on Set Theory. And we dont have in IRL these "type-classes". There is no class for Dog or Cat. Evolution doesnt work this top-down jewish way.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 4:48

And we got ourselves an official board nutcase.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:01

>>34
>and
Ok. You can now go back to the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:12

>>35
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

>>36
I don't take orders from jewish maggots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:25

>>35,36
Please try to ignore troll posts. I just wish this troll would use a name so that I can easily ignore her.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:31

>>38
Stop your ad hominem, jew. You all know I'm not troll.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:33

>>38
<-------- please try to check my epic singles over here


also:
can easily ignore her.

You must be a GNU/Basementdweller, since you emacs goatfuckers are the only one who refer to people with "her".

But don't worry; you'll never get laid anyway

laughing-girls.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 6:13

>>40
fuck you faggot

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 6:24

>>40
So nice, that you riminded us of the evil GNU. Their Stallman is the jew, we should thank for prolonged "live" of undead Unix's KISS ideology. Without his FOSS support Unix/Linux would be long dead, as it should.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 6:27

Always remember, evil Stallman started FSF to hamper Symbolics efforts to advance LISP and LISP-Machines.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:01

>>42
Just get the heirloom tools + clang, and you won't have to use any of that GNU bullshite, so stop bawwwing like a little bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:06

>>44
There is no good tools, because of commie jews, like your Stallman, we cant have Lisp OS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:26

>>45
like your Stallman
As far as I'm concerned, most Linux users (torvalds included) see stallman as the very reincarnation of satan himself.

we cant have Lisp OS

Show your unbelievable programming skills and write your own. And don't even try to tell me you don't have any time to do so; You have time to learn LISP, ergo you are unemployed, and likely trailerpark trash.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:30

>>46

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:32

I keep hearing about?
you're hanging out in the wrong places

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:44

>>48

WHAT?!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:46

Trolls trolling jews. This is the /prog/ that I like.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 7:49

>>46
As far as I'm concerned, most Linux users (torvalds included) see stallman as the very reincarnation of satan himself.
Torvalds was just an average CS student with a stupid unix-clone thesis. Without foundations of FSF's ideology his project would have ended in garbage can, like millions of other factorials, like the endless stream you post on prog, after reading SICP.

Show your unbelievable programming skills and write your own. And don't even try to tell me you don't have any time to do so; You have time to learn LISP, ergo you are unemployed, and likely trailerpark trash.
In 21-century lonewolfing an OS would be crazy. And even one succeeds creating working prototype, jews would label him as "crank". End of story.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 8:04

>>51
Need I remind you of LoseThos?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 8:06

>>52

LoseThos?

I liked it better when it was called autism.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 8:13

If I could marry a single post on this board, it would be >>37

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 8:44

>>51
Torvalds was just an average CS student with [...]
So you're just bashing everything else besides Windows because... You have never used anything else besides windows. Now that's some serious objective review, right there!


In 21-century lonewolfing an OS would be crazy. And even one succeeds creating working prototype, jews would label him as "crank". End of story.

Funny, torvalds managed to write one too. He must be a robot or something!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 8:52

>>55

I didn't know that Torvalds wrote an OS by himself in the 21st century.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 9:15

>>56
He didn't. Thomson and Ritchie did.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 9:19

>>55
So you're just bashing everything else besides Windows because...
Windows NT is just another Unix clone.

You have never used anything else besides windows
I'm using Linux right now for about 6 years. I dont have Windows on my subnotbook. So I know Unix and hate Unix with passion. It is the hatred you feel, when know something too well.

Name: VIPPER 2011-02-26 9:52

>>57
That was 20th century.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 10:18

>>59
Tell this to >>55

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 10:20

>>58
Windows NT is just another Unix clone.
I doubt it. And if it really is, which i strongly doubt, it got the worst POSIX support ever possible.

I'm using Linux right now for about 6 years. I dont have Windows on my subnotbook. So I know Unix and hate Unix with passion. It is the hatred you feel, when know something too well.

Then maybe you should stop confusing Linux with Unix. And no, I'm not quoting that dirty communist thief who goes by the alias "Stallman", but by the fact that Linux is not Unix. Torvalds would tell you the same. And probably punch you in your stupid faggotface for saying shit like that.

Also, I do have both Windows and Linux installed. And I do enjoy using both. But maybe that's just because i see in Windows and Linux what they are, namely operating systems, and not holy grails.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 10:39

>>61
if it really is, which i strongly doubt, it got the worst POSIX support ever possible.
if he really is gay, which i strongly doubt, he did me the worst blowjob ever possible.

Linux is not Unix.
Faggot is not gay.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 10:59

>>62
rage rage rage mad mad mad

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 11:00

Natural number get

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 11:22

>>61
Linux is not Unix
GNU's Not Unix/LINUX Is Not UniX.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 13:44

epic dubs!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 20:13

>>65
Linux is not unix
GNU's Not Unix/LINUX Is Not Unix, Xarn
ftfy

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 22:07

>>58
NT is a VMS clone, not a UNIX clone.
If it was a UNIX clone it might have actually been useful.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 22:12

> > >

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 22:17

s > a > g
>>e

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 23:24

if i put my post on a platform
will it help it stand out?
give
me
attention
please!
too
lisp
didn't
sicp

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 1:35

>>68
Stop butthurting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:32

Thread successfully derailed
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -