/prog/ - buzzwords

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:26

Hey /prog/

What's this ``dynamic programming'' I keep hearing about?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:27

mailto:noko
reported

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:28

It's programming 101.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:38

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming

Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

noko every day

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:30

>>4
What does that mean?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:35

>>6
Read your SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:42

Evidently it means ``recursion''.

The word dynamic was chosen by Bellman to capture the time-varying aspect of the problems, and also because it sounded impressive.^[3] The word programming referred to the use of the method to find an optimal program, in the sense of a military schedule for training or logistics. This usage is the same as that in the phrases linear programming and mathematical programming, a synonym for optimization.^[4]

Name: 2011-02-25 22:49

Read your CLRS

Abstractly you just bread down a problem into states and express some calculation in terms of calculations of smaller states (yes, similar to recursion). You then just calculate from the smaller states to the larger states to perform the calculation on all states.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:59

Dynamic Programming is a jewish pseudo-science based on jewish set theory. You wont need it in practice, because in real life there're no infinities and sets, dynamic programming is based.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:03

>>8
And there is no "time" or "speed", because ther are no cartesian distances, just cellular automatoes, that create a bunch of hypotheses, one which is our reality.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:13

>>10

Yeah just keep calculating the fibonacci numbers in exponential time

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:23

>>12
fibs have nothing to do with set theory, jew.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:29

>>13

'fibs' definitely has something to do with dp, however

OP: Try reading http://www.topcoder.com/tc?d1=tutorials&d2=dynProg&module=Static for a tutorial on the matter

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:35

>>14
I already heard same shit about Lisp: that Lisp is math, because its `lambda` keyword is named after some non-existing set theoretic entity, nobody cares about. So either you show us your "infinite set" or goto osvencim, jew. And stop fucking people's brains!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:49

>>15
You could just go back to /sci/ or /sci/. The only one who cares about jews here is VIPPER.

Name: VIPPAR 2011-02-26 0:03

JAWS

Name: VIPP∀R 2011-02-26 0:05

J∀WS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:22

>>16
If you accept Set Theory (a jewish invention), then you care. And most people on /prog/ accept Set Theory. Dynamic Programming is based on Graph Theory, which is part of Jewish Set theory. So I'm in right place.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:24

Cantor Cranks on my /prague/?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

>>19
I solemnly refuse to have bitch tits.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

>>19
Dynamic Programming is based on Graph Theory
Meaning you wont be allowed to work in Graph Theory, without using Set Theory. If you try inventing your own theory, you will be quickly marked as a dissident and expelled from university. This is the way jews deals with their enemies.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:28

>>20
You will become famous if you please famous people -- and all famous mathematicians like axiomatic set theory. -- Paul Lorenzen

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:05

>>22,23
Okay, now I know IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:10

>>24
Just remember, you cant do anything without jewish consent.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:35

>>25
Fuck off, ``nazist''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:47

>>25
Siegh heil, ``mein fuhrer''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:56

>>26
You say "nazist" like it something bad. They were smart people, who tried to free their home and ideals from jewish infection. If not for them, Germany would probably became infected with jewish communism, a defective ideology, with roots in ugly jewish religion. Alas they were defeated by jews and their communism.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:03

>>28
get the fuck out already

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:04

>>29
I don't take orders from jewish maggots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:19

>>30
You know you can't troll people who don't know shit about that, right? The /sci/ guys masturbate over infinity and that jewish stuff, we used to masturbate over SICP and The Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:26

>>31
I'm not trolling. I'm dead serious. If you graduated from any university with CS degree, then you know what set theory is, and what it leads to.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:38

>>32
In my country we don't even have CS. We call it Informatics and study Jewa and SCALABLE ENTERPRISE DESIGN PATTERNS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:48

>>33
Informatics includes Set Theory, as basis.

>and study Jewa and SCALABLE ENTERPRISE DESIGN PATTERNS.
The problem with Java isnt that it "enterprise", but that it is based on type-theory, which itself based on Set Theory. And we dont have in IRL these "type-classes". There is no class for Dog or Cat. Evolution doesnt work this top-down jewish way.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 4:48

And we got ourselves an official board nutcase.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:01

>>34
>and
Ok. You can now go back to the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:12

>>35
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

>>36
I don't take orders from jewish maggots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:25

>>35,36
Please try to ignore troll posts. I just wish this troll would use a name so that I can easily ignore her.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:31

>>38
Stop your ad hominem, jew. You all know I'm not troll.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:33

>>38
<-------- please try to check my epic singles over here

also:
can easily ignore her.

You must be a GNU/Basementdweller, since you emacs goatfuckers are the only one who refer to people with "her".

But don't worry; you'll never get laid anyway

laughing-girls.jpg

buzzwords

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:26

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:27

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:28

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:38

5 Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:30

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:35

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:42

9 Name: 2011-02-25 22:49

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:59

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:03

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:13

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:23

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:29

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:35

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:49

17 Name: VIPPAR 2011-02-26 0:03

18 Name: VIPP∀R 2011-02-26 0:05

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:22

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:24

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:28

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:05

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:10

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:35

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:47

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:56

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:03

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:04

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:19

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:26

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:38

34 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:48

35 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 4:48

36 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:01

37 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:12

38 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:25

39 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:31

40 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:27

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:28

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 11:38

Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:42

Name: 2011-02-25 22:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:29

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:49

Name: VIPPAR 2011-02-26 0:03

Name: VIPP∀R 2011-02-26 0:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:27

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:28

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 1:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:47

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 2:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 3:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 4:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 5:33