+1 support for Ruby, but I still love Lua <3
Stopped taking these guys seriously right there.
But lets assemble these "thoughts" for a moment:
+ They want to do it in C (good luck debugging memory leaks, and reinventing std::map & std::vector over and over again!)
+ They discuss using Lua. Good thing actually - if they weren't arguing about the syntax like it would actually fucking matter
+ No concept whatsoever, but already opened a github page, AND a sketchpad hosted by a german socialist party (pirate party). Why don't they just invite Marx himself, since they are already clearly fucked in the butt?
+ They actually believe that '-O' means 'it runs faster', which is wrong, wrong on so many levels in fact
+ They even discuss using V8. Bad Idea - V8 is a major PITA, uses global variables internally, uses threading internally, which makes finding bugs fucking impossible
+ They believe they could possibly kick out a game that even just remotely resembles Minecraft in roughly a week - Notch probably worked around 2 years (just a guess, but including the time to the first Beta version)
+ "Assembler" - wat
+ "SSE3" - these fuckers clearly have no idea what they're talking about
+ "XNA" - can it possibly get any more obvious
Some claim that you could write a fullblown game in plain C - I have no clue where the hell they heard that, but i strongly doubt it relies on facts. Every single major game is written in C#, C++, Java, or a mix of these three. Don't believe me? Just scan (filealyzer, faggot) the DLL and EXE files.
Even with SDL, doing a game in C is clearly impossible, without fucking reinventing things like binary tables, binary arrays, shared pointers, proper string handling, avoiding memory leaks, and so on.
Just yet another aids-riddled thread on /g/, i suppose...
>>12
>Notch probably worked around 2 years (just a guess, but including the time to the first Beta version)
This proves that java sucks. If you cant implement a complete game in a month, then your language is good for nothing.
Whoever you are (it doesn't matter) please leave /prog/ forever, your post was of equal or lesser quality than the average post produced by an average imageboard poster.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-21 20:43
>>30
>implying you don't suck cocks for a living.
seriously, i will keep shitposting until each one of you elitist cock sucking faggots stops going ``hurr durr leave /anus/ lolol'' without any sort of explanation of why you don't agree with the person you are replying to. it would seem that threads related to C++ are correlated with attracting this kind of faggotry. gee, i wonder why.
>>31
What you're doing is the equivalent of shitting yourself in public and then shouting at a random stranger because they didn't change your diaper. You're not entitled to an explanation every time you say something colossally stupid. We don't have to argue to know that you're wrong, because we already understand the subject matter. If you don't, you shouldn't be here. This is not a forum for amateurs.