Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

/prog/ is dead

Name: /prog/ is dead 2011-02-18 19:20

And all we got left are:

 + a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you to read SICP
 + a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that HAKSAL is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
 + a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that Scheme is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
 + exactly 2 (two) people who didn't go batshit insane yet, and actually try to safe /prog/
 + at least 100 underage cocksuckers migrated from /g/, who will post retarded bullshit into every single thread (yes, even in this one), and are finally the reason why /prog/ is dead
 + a bunch of loners who will constantly start some retarded flamewar about whose language calculates the Fibonacci sequence faster as if that would be such a big deal
 + exactly 3 (three) people who actually believe that any thread /prog/ receives serious answers

/prog/ is dead
/prog/ will be dead forever
and all you guys do is lolitrolu on a corpse
it's pathetic

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:21

NO EXCEPTIONS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:24

/prog/ is dead. Long live /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:26

+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you to read SICP
+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that HAKSAL is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that Scheme is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
+ a bunch of loners who will constantly start some retarded flamewar about whose language calculates the Fibonacci sequence faster as if that would be such a big deal
What? Those are pure /prog/riders.
+ exactly 2 (two) people who didn't go batshit insane yet, and actually try to safe /prog/
That was me, but I've lost all hope I had in /prog/.
+ at least 100 underage cocksuckers migrated from /g/, who will post retarded bullshit into every single thread (yes, even in this one), and are finally the reason why /prog/ is dead
Yes.
+ exactly 3 (three) people who actually believe that any thread /prog/ receives serious answers
Yes.
/prog/ is dead
Yes.
/prog/ will be dead forever
We just need Xarn.
and all you guys do is lolitrolu
lolitrolu
Stopped reading here, go back to /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:27

If that's your definition of dead, then /prog/ has never been alive.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:31

>>5
/prog/ sure has seen better times, you can believe me that much

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:34

Who cares. Stop taking /prog/ so seriously. It's true this is the el8~ place on the internet but still.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:37

>>7
It was once. It isn't anymore, thanks to you and your aids ridden friends.

>>4
We just need Xarn.
Xarn-kun commited suicide a while ago. Ergo why I said that /prog/ is dead for all eternity.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:42

>>1

fuck you faggot

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:42

>>8
Xarn-kun commited suicide a while ago.
Why did I see him talking on IRC just a few hours ago? Surely I must have seen his ghost talking.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:42

<-- check 'em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:50

>>10
If you "saw" him on IRC, that means the assassin fucked up. But thank you for your report; I shall immediately send a new assassin.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 19:54

most of the memes can be scripted away with a simple userscript

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=quMYBNi2

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:03

>>12
/prog/ has an IRC channel?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:04

>>14
I count three IRC channels.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:05

>>14

#/g/tv

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:09

>>15
where at?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:28

>>17
One/two on Rizon, one/two on Freenode. Finding them is left as an exercise for the /prog/rider.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:37

>>18
I believe I've found at least two, which means i've found all channels, since there are only two.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:44

+ a bunch of loners who consistently whine about how /prog/ is dying.

Yes, it's not as good as it once was, we heard you lot the first time. Either do something to make this place better or shut the fuck up.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:49

>>19
#bbcode, #/prog/, #sicp and #haskell

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:49

<-- that's cool and all, but check my doubles over there

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:51

+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you to read SICP
+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that HAKSAL is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
+ a bunch of loners who will constantly tell you that Scheme is OMG THE BEST LANGUAGE EVER
these people (when on-topic) are fine by me.

+ exactly 2 (two) people who didn't go batshit insane yet, and actually try to safe /prog/
i think you mean 'save', and i hope you don't include yourself.
these people are still... relatively by by me.

+ at least 100 underage cocksuckers migrated from /g/, who will post retarded bullshit into every single thread (yes, even in this one), and are finally the reason why /prog/ is dead
these people are not fine by me.

+ a bunch of loners who will constantly start some retarded flamewar about whose language calculates the Fibonacci sequence faster as if that would be such a big deal
these people are absolutely fine by me.

+ exactly 3 (three) people who actually believe that any thread /prog/ receives serious answers
/prog/ does provide serious answers

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:53

how do i quote properly?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:55

>>21
looks like i've joined the wrong channels then :-(

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:57

>>23
i think you mean 'save', and i hope you don't include yourself
I sure didn't mean you by it, also, fuck you grammarnazi >:(.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 21:18

/prog/ does provide serious answers
Yes, but usually to the wrong question (at least from the OPs point of view).

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 21:29

>>27
You missed some Doctor Racket's posts, then. Too bad he left /prog/ too.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 22:16

hi, I'm new here

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 22:58

▲▲▲

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 23:41

>>30
Back to /b/.

Name: Fuck off, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-02-18 23:49

>>31
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Back to /b/, !uaVa00FkCs 2011-02-18 23:52

>>32
Back to /b/, ``please''.

Name: Fuck off, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-02-19 0:03

>>33
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Back to /b/, !uaVa00FkCs 2011-02-19 0:08

>>34
Back to /b/, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-19 0:44

That's right everybody. Everyone should get back to /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-19 0:54

>>36
Nope. Just those faggots that came from (not /prog/)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-19 1:16

That was me, but I've lost all hope I had in /prog/.

Hey! Me also. So now no one will save /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-19 1:59

▲▲▲

inb4 people saying it's done using [m] or back2/b/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-19 2:25

>>39
I'm not going to say back two /b/, but back to /b/.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -