Does "Liar Paradox" requires this crappy Axiom of Infinity, that "for all N there exit N+1 > N"?
Because if you don't believe Axiom of Infinity, then for some theory (or program) N, you can't construct it's Liar structure, as it would require more memory than you have physically.
Of course, jews would say, that without infinity there is no mathematics, but why do we need this jewish tendency toward abstraction and casuistry anyway? Can you show us practical usefulness of your deceptive regilious theories, jews?
Greeks thought earth was an infinite flat plane and there can be parallel lines. Today every child knows that earth is round, but some "god chosen" jews still believe in parallel infinite long lines.
>>1 Can you show us practical usefulness of [infinity]
Everything that has ever used maths? If you discard this axiom, you don't even "believe" in the naturals, so all of mathematics is lost.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 11:29
>>7
>Everything that has ever used maths? practical usefulness
>If you discard this axiom, you don't even "believe" in the naturals, so all of mathematics is lost.
If you need natural, you're probably doing something, building yet another crazy theory with half-dead cats in perpetual motion.
>>8
Calculus is used in many, many applied fields. There's no argument to be had here; unless you're secluded from society in a shack you built yourself, magically beaming posts to this board, you are already reaping the practical benefits of maths.
>>22 ONE WORD: THE FORCED INDENTATION OF THREAD OVER. THREAD OVER.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 16:06
So the math is a useless pseudoscience I guess.
LISP is much, much better than math.
And LISP has nice uniform syntax, without all these greek and jewish letters.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 16:09
Also, I easily copy-paste LISP code. But mathematics requires ugly La-TeX stuff to graph crazy diagrams.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 16:16
Even SEPPLES has more rigor and elegancy than mathematics.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 17:51
google 'lazy lists'
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-07 17:55
uh
OP is an idiot
one of the most prolific finitists right now is jewish
>>28
You don't know what "jewish" means. It is not nationality or race. It is more like ideology, being arrogant and "God Chosen", worshiping infinity and the stuff.
>>33
Now I have hyper-lazy-meta-infinite problems, thank you very much.
>>35
That is general syntax. Larry got on a Huffman coding kick, and the result is just about any conceptually simple expression is equivalent in length to the J version fairly tight.