Liar Paradox

Does "Liar Paradox" requires this crappy Axiom of Infinity, that "for all N there exit N+1 > N"?
Because if you don't believe Axiom of Infinity, then for some theory (or program) N, you can't construct it's Liar structure, as it would require more memory than you have physically.

Of course, jews would say, that without infinity there is no mathematics, but why do we need this jewish tendency toward abstraction and casuistry anyway? Can you show us practical usefulness of your deceptive regilious theories, jews?

>>7
>Everything that has ever used maths?
practical usefulness

>If you discard this axiom, you don't even "believe" in the naturals, so all of mathematics is lost.
If you need natural, you're probably doing something, building yet another crazy theory with half-dead cats in perpetual motion.

>>8
if you need naturals
self fix